Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Migration, Refugees and Human Security in the Mediterranean and MENA]( "Migration, Refugees and Human Security in the Mediterranean and MENA")
Migration, Refugees and Human Security in the Mediterranean and MENA63,99 €![Migration, Refugees and Human Security in the Mediterranean and MENA]( "Migration, Refugees and Human Security in the Mediterranean and MENA")
Migration, Refugees and Human Security in the Mediterranean and MENA88,99 €![Raphael Lemkin and his struggle for the recognition of genocide by international law]( "Raphael Lemkin and his struggle for the recognition of genocide by international law")
Raphael Lemkin and his struggle for the recognition of genocide by international law15,95 €![British Justice, War Crimes and Human Rights Violations]( "British Justice, War Crimes and Human Rights Violations")
British Justice, War Crimes and Human Rights Violations59,99 €![British Justice, War Crimes and Human Rights Violations]( "British Justice, War Crimes and Human Rights Violations")
British Justice, War Crimes and Human Rights Violations44,99 €![Gender inequality in the 2014 Ebola Crisis and Human Security]( "Gender inequality in the 2014 Ebola Crisis and Human Security")
Gender inequality in the 2014 Ebola Crisis and Human Security27,95 €![The Extraterritorial Obligations of States for the Realization and Protection of the Right to Education]( "The Extraterritorial Obligations of States for the Realization and Protection of the Right to Education")
The Extraterritorial Obligations of States for the Realization and Protection of the Right to Education27,95 €
Essay from the year 2021 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: Public International Law and Human Rights, grade: 7.0, Tilburg University, course: International law and human security, language: English, abstract: This paper addresses the question of whether International law related to human security is adequate to address modern challenges, I argue in the affirmative, albeit partially. While I believe that International law in this area can certainly be improved upon as law, in general, is a dynamic phenomenon, it would be erroneous to assert that the laws are not adequate to address modern challenges to a considerable extent. In support of my position, I aim to advance the perspective that in matters concerning international human security law, we must draw distinctions between 'adequate/adequacy' and 'application.' Whereas 'adequate' means "sufficient for a specific need or requirement." On the other hand, 'application' means "an act of putting something touse." It is my view that though international law is generally sufficient to address modern challenges, actions taken by international actors to tackle human security issues are usually unpredictable. 'Law,' being an institutional fixture, is enacted to ensure predictability and uniformity, and international law should be no exception. However, international actors are generally inclined to think and act otherwise. It is one thing to develop laws, and it is an entirely different matter to apply them. In further support of my position, I also seek to present the view and necessary evidence that the application of international law related to human security is majorly dependent on State policy and not the adequacy or otherwise of the law. Humanity's duty to protect human security interests in both conflict and non-conflict situations is deemed essential. Accordingly, the need for a comprehensive and inclusive International legal framework on human security is justified. In the wakeof the security issues that we have been confronted with in the past and those that continue to threaten our concerted safety, deliberations surrounding the adequacy or otherwise of International law related to human security vis-à-vis modern challenges are inevitable.