Elihu Lauterpacht / C. J. Greenwood / A. G. Oppenheimer (eds.)
International Law Reports
Herausgeber: Lauterpacht, Elihu; Oppenheimer, A G; Greenwood, C J
Elihu Lauterpacht / C. J. Greenwood / A. G. Oppenheimer (eds.)
International Law Reports
Herausgeber: Lauterpacht, Elihu; Oppenheimer, A G; Greenwood, C J
- Gebundenes Buch
- Merkliste
- Auf die Merkliste
- Bewerten Bewerten
- Teilen
- Produkt teilen
- Produkterinnerung
- Produkterinnerung
Volume 121 includes cases on investment protection, and decisions relating to the Cumaraswamy immunity case.
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
- Elihu Lauterpacht / C. J. Greenwood / A. G. Oppenheimer (eds.)International Law Reports240,99 €
- Elihu Lauterpacht / C. J. Greenwood / A. G. Oppenheimer (eds.)International Law Reports249,99 €
- Elihu Lauterpacht / C. J. Greenwood / A. G. Oppenheimer (eds.)International Law Reports214,99 €
- A. G. Oppenheimer (Associate ed.) / Karen LeeInternational Law Reports249,99 €
- Andrew Oppenheimer (Associate ed.) / Karen Lee (Assist. ed.)International Law Reports249,99 €
- E. Lauterpacht / C. J. Greenwood (eds.)International Law Reports215,99 €
- Elihu Lauterpacht (ed.)International Law Reports215,99 €
-
-
-
Volume 121 includes cases on investment protection, and decisions relating to the Cumaraswamy immunity case.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Produktdetails
- Produktdetails
- Verlag: Cambridge University Press
- Seitenzahl: 722
- Erscheinungstermin: 18. Juli 2002
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 221mm x 147mm x 43mm
- Gewicht: 1021g
- ISBN-13: 9780521807746
- ISBN-10: 0521807743
- Artikelnr.: 26929304
- Verlag: Cambridge University Press
- Seitenzahl: 722
- Erscheinungstermin: 18. Juli 2002
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 221mm x 147mm x 43mm
- Gewicht: 1021g
- ISBN-13: 9780521807746
- ISBN-10: 0521807743
- Artikelnr.: 26929304
1. Azinian v. United Mexican States [INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES (ADDITIONAL FACILITY)] 01
11
99; 2. Waste Management Inc. v. United Mexican States [INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES (ADDITIONAL FACILITY)] 02
06
00; 3. S. D. Myers, Inc. v. Canada [NAFTA ARBITRATION TRIBUNAL UNDER THE UNCITRAL RULES] + NOTE (Procedural Order No 10 and explanatory note) 13
11
00; 4. McElhinney v. Ireland and the United Kingdom (Application No 31253
96) [EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (GRAND CHAMBER)] + NOTE (Al-Adsani v. United Kingdom; Fogarty v. United Kingdom: Admissibility) 09
02
00; 5. Naletilic v. Croatia (Application No 51891
99) [EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (FOURTH SECTION)] 04
05
00; 6. Prosecutor v. Anton Furundzija (Case IT-95-17
1) [INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA] 10
12
98 (Trial Chamber II) 21
07
00 (Appeals Chamber); 7. MBf Capital Bhd and Another v. Dato' Param Cumaraswamy [MALAYSIA] 28
06
97 (High Ct) 20
10
97 (Ct of Appeal); 8. Difference relating to Immunity from Legal Process of a Special Rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights (Advisory Opinion) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE] 29
04
99; 9. Insas Bhd and Another v. Dato' Param Cumaraswamy [MALAYSIA] 07
07
00; 10. CGM Industrial (Pty) Ltd and Others v. KPMG and Others [SOUTH AFRICA] 12
02
98; 11. Skeen v. Federative Republic of Brazil [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 07
07
83; 12. Chisholm & Co. and Chisholm v. Bank of Jamaica and Barber [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 05
09
86; 13. Finzer and Others v. Barry and Others; Boos, Waller and Brooker v. Barry and Others [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 19
08
86 (Ct Apps) 22
03
88 (Sup Ct); 14. In re Mr and Mrs Doe; Mr and Mrs Doe v. United States of America [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 19
10
88; 15. First American Corporation and Others v. Sheikh Zayed Bin Sultan Al-Nahyan and Others [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 26
11
96; 16. United States of America v. Noriega [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 07
07
97; 17. United States of America v. Sissoko [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 03
09
97; 18. Alejandre v. Republic of Cuba and the Cuban Air Force; Mendez v. Republic of Cuba and the Cuban Air Force; De La Peña v. Republic of Cuba and the Cuban Air Force [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 17
12
97; 19. Flatow v. Islamic Republic of Iran and Others [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 11
03
98.
11
99; 2. Waste Management Inc. v. United Mexican States [INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES (ADDITIONAL FACILITY)] 02
06
00; 3. S. D. Myers, Inc. v. Canada [NAFTA ARBITRATION TRIBUNAL UNDER THE UNCITRAL RULES] + NOTE (Procedural Order No 10 and explanatory note) 13
11
00; 4. McElhinney v. Ireland and the United Kingdom (Application No 31253
96) [EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (GRAND CHAMBER)] + NOTE (Al-Adsani v. United Kingdom; Fogarty v. United Kingdom: Admissibility) 09
02
00; 5. Naletilic v. Croatia (Application No 51891
99) [EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (FOURTH SECTION)] 04
05
00; 6. Prosecutor v. Anton Furundzija (Case IT-95-17
1) [INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA] 10
12
98 (Trial Chamber II) 21
07
00 (Appeals Chamber); 7. MBf Capital Bhd and Another v. Dato' Param Cumaraswamy [MALAYSIA] 28
06
97 (High Ct) 20
10
97 (Ct of Appeal); 8. Difference relating to Immunity from Legal Process of a Special Rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights (Advisory Opinion) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE] 29
04
99; 9. Insas Bhd and Another v. Dato' Param Cumaraswamy [MALAYSIA] 07
07
00; 10. CGM Industrial (Pty) Ltd and Others v. KPMG and Others [SOUTH AFRICA] 12
02
98; 11. Skeen v. Federative Republic of Brazil [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 07
07
83; 12. Chisholm & Co. and Chisholm v. Bank of Jamaica and Barber [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 05
09
86; 13. Finzer and Others v. Barry and Others; Boos, Waller and Brooker v. Barry and Others [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 19
08
86 (Ct Apps) 22
03
88 (Sup Ct); 14. In re Mr and Mrs Doe; Mr and Mrs Doe v. United States of America [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 19
10
88; 15. First American Corporation and Others v. Sheikh Zayed Bin Sultan Al-Nahyan and Others [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 26
11
96; 16. United States of America v. Noriega [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 07
07
97; 17. United States of America v. Sissoko [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 03
09
97; 18. Alejandre v. Republic of Cuba and the Cuban Air Force; Mendez v. Republic of Cuba and the Cuban Air Force; De La Peña v. Republic of Cuba and the Cuban Air Force [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 17
12
97; 19. Flatow v. Islamic Republic of Iran and Others [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 11
03
98.
1. Azinian v. United Mexican States [INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES (ADDITIONAL FACILITY)] 01
11
99; 2. Waste Management Inc. v. United Mexican States [INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES (ADDITIONAL FACILITY)] 02
06
00; 3. S. D. Myers, Inc. v. Canada [NAFTA ARBITRATION TRIBUNAL UNDER THE UNCITRAL RULES] + NOTE (Procedural Order No 10 and explanatory note) 13
11
00; 4. McElhinney v. Ireland and the United Kingdom (Application No 31253
96) [EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (GRAND CHAMBER)] + NOTE (Al-Adsani v. United Kingdom; Fogarty v. United Kingdom: Admissibility) 09
02
00; 5. Naletilic v. Croatia (Application No 51891
99) [EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (FOURTH SECTION)] 04
05
00; 6. Prosecutor v. Anton Furundzija (Case IT-95-17
1) [INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA] 10
12
98 (Trial Chamber II) 21
07
00 (Appeals Chamber); 7. MBf Capital Bhd and Another v. Dato' Param Cumaraswamy [MALAYSIA] 28
06
97 (High Ct) 20
10
97 (Ct of Appeal); 8. Difference relating to Immunity from Legal Process of a Special Rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights (Advisory Opinion) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE] 29
04
99; 9. Insas Bhd and Another v. Dato' Param Cumaraswamy [MALAYSIA] 07
07
00; 10. CGM Industrial (Pty) Ltd and Others v. KPMG and Others [SOUTH AFRICA] 12
02
98; 11. Skeen v. Federative Republic of Brazil [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 07
07
83; 12. Chisholm & Co. and Chisholm v. Bank of Jamaica and Barber [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 05
09
86; 13. Finzer and Others v. Barry and Others; Boos, Waller and Brooker v. Barry and Others [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 19
08
86 (Ct Apps) 22
03
88 (Sup Ct); 14. In re Mr and Mrs Doe; Mr and Mrs Doe v. United States of America [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 19
10
88; 15. First American Corporation and Others v. Sheikh Zayed Bin Sultan Al-Nahyan and Others [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 26
11
96; 16. United States of America v. Noriega [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 07
07
97; 17. United States of America v. Sissoko [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 03
09
97; 18. Alejandre v. Republic of Cuba and the Cuban Air Force; Mendez v. Republic of Cuba and the Cuban Air Force; De La Peña v. Republic of Cuba and the Cuban Air Force [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 17
12
97; 19. Flatow v. Islamic Republic of Iran and Others [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 11
03
98.
11
99; 2. Waste Management Inc. v. United Mexican States [INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES (ADDITIONAL FACILITY)] 02
06
00; 3. S. D. Myers, Inc. v. Canada [NAFTA ARBITRATION TRIBUNAL UNDER THE UNCITRAL RULES] + NOTE (Procedural Order No 10 and explanatory note) 13
11
00; 4. McElhinney v. Ireland and the United Kingdom (Application No 31253
96) [EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (GRAND CHAMBER)] + NOTE (Al-Adsani v. United Kingdom; Fogarty v. United Kingdom: Admissibility) 09
02
00; 5. Naletilic v. Croatia (Application No 51891
99) [EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (FOURTH SECTION)] 04
05
00; 6. Prosecutor v. Anton Furundzija (Case IT-95-17
1) [INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA] 10
12
98 (Trial Chamber II) 21
07
00 (Appeals Chamber); 7. MBf Capital Bhd and Another v. Dato' Param Cumaraswamy [MALAYSIA] 28
06
97 (High Ct) 20
10
97 (Ct of Appeal); 8. Difference relating to Immunity from Legal Process of a Special Rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights (Advisory Opinion) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE] 29
04
99; 9. Insas Bhd and Another v. Dato' Param Cumaraswamy [MALAYSIA] 07
07
00; 10. CGM Industrial (Pty) Ltd and Others v. KPMG and Others [SOUTH AFRICA] 12
02
98; 11. Skeen v. Federative Republic of Brazil [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 07
07
83; 12. Chisholm & Co. and Chisholm v. Bank of Jamaica and Barber [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 05
09
86; 13. Finzer and Others v. Barry and Others; Boos, Waller and Brooker v. Barry and Others [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 19
08
86 (Ct Apps) 22
03
88 (Sup Ct); 14. In re Mr and Mrs Doe; Mr and Mrs Doe v. United States of America [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 19
10
88; 15. First American Corporation and Others v. Sheikh Zayed Bin Sultan Al-Nahyan and Others [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 26
11
96; 16. United States of America v. Noriega [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 07
07
97; 17. United States of America v. Sissoko [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 03
09
97; 18. Alejandre v. Republic of Cuba and the Cuban Air Force; Mendez v. Republic of Cuba and the Cuban Air Force; De La Peña v. Republic of Cuba and the Cuban Air Force [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 17
12
97; 19. Flatow v. Islamic Republic of Iran and Others [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 11
03
98.