C. J. Greenwood (Assist. ed.)

International Law Reports

Herausgeber: Lauterpacht, E.

• Gebundenes Buch

Produktbeschreibung

International Law Reports is the only publication in the world wholly devoted to the regular and systematic reporting in English of courts and arbitrators, as well as judgements of national courts.

---

Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.

Produktdetails

• Verlag: Cambridge University Press
• Seitenzahl: 770
• Erscheinungstermin: 1. Januar 1994
• Englisch
• Abmessung: 229mm x 152mm x 54mm
• Gewicht: 1220g
• ISBN-13: 9780521464246
• ISBN-10: 0521464242
• Artikelnr.: 29338193

Inhaltsangabe

Table of Cases Reported; I. Decisions of International Tribunals: Proposed
Amendments to the Naturalisation Provisions of the Political Constitution
of Costa Rico (Advisory Opinion OC-4/84) [Inter-American Court of Human
Rights] (1984), Enforceability of the Right to Reply or Correction
(Articles 14(1), 1(1) and 2 of the American Convention on Human Rights)
(Advisory Opinion OC-7/85) [Inter-American Court of Human Rights] (1986),
Word 'Laws' in Article 30 of the American Convention on Human Rights, The
(Advisory Opinion OC-6/86) [Inter-American Court of Human Rights] (1986),
Almeida de Quinteros and Quinteros almeida v. Uruguay (Communication No
R24/107) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] (1983), Almirati Nieto v.
Uruguay (Communication No R23/92) [United Nations Human Rights Committee]
(1983), Drescher Caldas v. Uruguay (Communication No R10/43) [United
Nations Human Rights Committee] (1983), Estradet Cabreira v. Uruguay
(Communication No R24/105) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] (1983),
Luyeye Magana v. Zaire (Communication No R22/90) [United Nations Human
Rights Committee] (1983), Martínez Machado v. Uruguay (Communication No
R20/83) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] (1983), Oxandabarat v.
Uruguay (Communication No R24/103) [United Nations Human Rights Committee]
(1983), Varela Nuñez v. Uruguay (Communication No R25/108) [United Nations
Human Rights Committee] (1983), AD v. Canada (Communication No R19/78)
[United Nations Human Rights Committee] (1984), Alfredo Romero v. Uruguay
(Communication No R21/85) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] (1984),
association for the Defence of the Rights of Disabled and Handicapped
Persons in Italy and Others v. Italy (Communication No 163/1984) [United
Nations Human Rights Committee] (1984), Gómez de Voituret v. Uruguay
(Communication No 25/109) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] (1984),
JK v. Canada (Communication No 174/1984) [United Nations Human Rights
Committee] (1984), MA v. Italy (Communication No 117/1981) [United Nations
Human Rights Committee] (1984), Manera Lluberas v. Uruguay (Communication
No R26/123) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] (1984), MF v. The
Netherlands (Communication No 173/1984) [United Nations Human Rights
Committee] (1984), Muteba v. Zaire (Communication No R26/124) [United
Nations Human Rights Committee] (1984), OF v. Norway (Communication
158/1983) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] (1984), Viana Acosta v.
Uruguay (Communication No R25/110) [United Nations Human Rights Committee]
(1984); II. Decisions of Municipal Courts: In re Musisi [England] (1987),
Regina v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Bugdaycay
[England] (1987), Regina v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex
parte Navaratnam [England] (1987), Regina v. Secretary of State for the
Home Department, ex parte Norman [England] (1987), Regina v. Secretary of
State for the Home Department, ex parte Santis [England] (1987), Regina v.
Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Sivakumaran [England]
(1987), Regina v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte
Vaithialingam [England] (1987), Regina v. Secretary of State for the Home
Department, ex parte Vathanan and Another [England] (1987), Regina v.
Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Vilvarajah [England]
(1987), McGlinchey v. Wren [Ireland] (1982), McMahon v. Leahy and the
Governor of Mountjoy Prison [Ireland] (1983), McMahon v. Leahy and the
Governor of Mountjoy Prison [Ireland] (1984), Quinn v. Wren [Ireland]
(1984), Shannon v. Fenning [Ireland] (1984), Shannon v. The
Attorney-General and Ireland [Ireland] (1984), Quinn v. Wren [Ireland]
(1985), Harte v. Fanning [Ireland] (1987), Harte v. Fanning and District
Justice Mahon [Ireland] (1987), Russell v. Fanning [Ireland] (1988),
Russell v. Governor of Portlaoise Prison, Fanning, and the Attorney-G