International Law Reports
Herausgeber: Lauterpacht, Elihu; Lee, Karen; Greenwood, Christopher
International Law Reports
Herausgeber: Lauterpacht, Elihu; Lee, Karen; Greenwood, Christopher
- Gebundenes Buch
- Merkliste
- Auf die Merkliste
- Bewerten Bewerten
- Teilen
- Produkt teilen
- Produkterinnerung
- Produkterinnerung
Reports in English on decisions of international courts and arbitrators and judgments of national courts.
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
- International Law Reports332,99 €
- International Law Reports246,99 €
- International Law Reports332,99 €
- International Law Reports332,99 €
- International Law Reports332,99 €
- International Law Reports324,99 €
- International Law Reports324,99 €
-
-
-
Reports in English on decisions of international courts and arbitrators and judgments of national courts.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Produktdetails
- Produktdetails
- Verlag: Cambridge University Press
- Seitenzahl: 818
- Erscheinungstermin: 6. August 2015
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 221mm x 150mm x 48mm
- Gewicht: 1202g
- ISBN-13: 9781107058866
- ISBN-10: 1107058864
- Artikelnr.: 42463640
- Herstellerkennzeichnung
- Libri GmbH
- Europaallee 1
- 36244 Bad Hersfeld
- 06621 890
- Verlag: Cambridge University Press
- Seitenzahl: 818
- Erscheinungstermin: 6. August 2015
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 221mm x 150mm x 48mm
- Gewicht: 1202g
- ISBN-13: 9781107058866
- ISBN-10: 1107058864
- Artikelnr.: 42463640
- Herstellerkennzeichnung
- Libri GmbH
- Europaallee 1
- 36244 Bad Hersfeld
- 06621 890
1. Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. Belgium)
(Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF
JUSTICE]; 2. Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v.
Canada) (Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) (NOTE)
[INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]; 3. Legality of Use of Force
(Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. France) (Provisional Measures)
(Preliminary Objections) (NOTE) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]; 4.
Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. Germany)
(Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) (NOTE) [INTERNATIONAL COURT
OF JUSTICE]; 5. Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro
v. Italy) (Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) (NOTE)
[INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]; 6. Legality of Use of Force
(Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. Netherlands) (Provisional Measures)
(Preliminary Objections) (NOTE) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]; 7.
Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. Portugal)
(Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) (NOTE) [INTERNATIONAL COURT
OF JUSTICE]; 8. Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro
v. Spain) (Provisional Measures) (NOTE) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE];
9. Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. United
Kingdom) (Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) (NOTE)
[INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]; 10. Legality of Use of Force
(Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. United States of America) (Provisional
Measures) (NOTE) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]; 11. Indus Waters
Kishenganga Arbitration (Islamic Republic of Pakistan v. Republic of India)
(Final Award) [COURT OF ARBITRATION]; (see 150 ILR 311 and 154 ILR 1 for
previous stages of case); 12. Indus Waters Kishenganga Arbitration (Islamic
Republic of Pakistan v. Republic of India) (Decision on India's Request for
Clarification or Interpretation dated 20 May 2013) [COURT OF ARBITRATION];
(see 150 ILR 311 and 154 ILR 1 for previous stages of case); 13. M/V Louisa
(Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Kingdom of Spain) (Merits)
[INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA]; (provisional measures
published in 148 ILR 459); 14. General Comment No 22 on the Right to
Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion (Article 18) [UNITED NATIONS
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE]; 15. Yoon and Choi v. Korea (Communication Nos
1321/2004 and 1322/2004) [UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE]; 16. Jeong
and Others v. Korea (Communication Nos 1642-1741/2007) [UNITED NATIONS
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE]; 17. Atasoy and Sarkut v. Turkey (Communication Nos
1853/2008 and 1854/2008) [UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE] ; 18. Kim
and Others v. Korea (Communication No 1786/2008) [UNITED NATIONS HUMAN
RIGHTS COMMITTEE]; 19. Attorney General of Canada on behalf of United
States of America v. Khadr Court of Appeal for Ontario (2011 ONCA 358)
[CANADA]; 20. Re: Aerial Drone Deployment on 4 October 2010 in Mir Ali,
Pakistan (Case No 3 BJs 7/12-4) (Targeted Killing in Pakistan Case)
(Federal Prosecutor General) [GERMANY]; Decision to Terminate Proceedings.
(Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF
JUSTICE]; 2. Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v.
Canada) (Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) (NOTE)
[INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]; 3. Legality of Use of Force
(Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. France) (Provisional Measures)
(Preliminary Objections) (NOTE) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]; 4.
Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. Germany)
(Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) (NOTE) [INTERNATIONAL COURT
OF JUSTICE]; 5. Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro
v. Italy) (Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) (NOTE)
[INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]; 6. Legality of Use of Force
(Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. Netherlands) (Provisional Measures)
(Preliminary Objections) (NOTE) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]; 7.
Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. Portugal)
(Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) (NOTE) [INTERNATIONAL COURT
OF JUSTICE]; 8. Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro
v. Spain) (Provisional Measures) (NOTE) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE];
9. Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. United
Kingdom) (Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) (NOTE)
[INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]; 10. Legality of Use of Force
(Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. United States of America) (Provisional
Measures) (NOTE) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]; 11. Indus Waters
Kishenganga Arbitration (Islamic Republic of Pakistan v. Republic of India)
(Final Award) [COURT OF ARBITRATION]; (see 150 ILR 311 and 154 ILR 1 for
previous stages of case); 12. Indus Waters Kishenganga Arbitration (Islamic
Republic of Pakistan v. Republic of India) (Decision on India's Request for
Clarification or Interpretation dated 20 May 2013) [COURT OF ARBITRATION];
(see 150 ILR 311 and 154 ILR 1 for previous stages of case); 13. M/V Louisa
(Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Kingdom of Spain) (Merits)
[INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA]; (provisional measures
published in 148 ILR 459); 14. General Comment No 22 on the Right to
Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion (Article 18) [UNITED NATIONS
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE]; 15. Yoon and Choi v. Korea (Communication Nos
1321/2004 and 1322/2004) [UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE]; 16. Jeong
and Others v. Korea (Communication Nos 1642-1741/2007) [UNITED NATIONS
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE]; 17. Atasoy and Sarkut v. Turkey (Communication Nos
1853/2008 and 1854/2008) [UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE] ; 18. Kim
and Others v. Korea (Communication No 1786/2008) [UNITED NATIONS HUMAN
RIGHTS COMMITTEE]; 19. Attorney General of Canada on behalf of United
States of America v. Khadr Court of Appeal for Ontario (2011 ONCA 358)
[CANADA]; 20. Re: Aerial Drone Deployment on 4 October 2010 in Mir Ali,
Pakistan (Case No 3 BJs 7/12-4) (Targeted Killing in Pakistan Case)
(Federal Prosecutor General) [GERMANY]; Decision to Terminate Proceedings.
1. Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. Belgium)
(Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF
JUSTICE]; 2. Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v.
Canada) (Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) (NOTE)
[INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]; 3. Legality of Use of Force
(Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. France) (Provisional Measures)
(Preliminary Objections) (NOTE) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]; 4.
Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. Germany)
(Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) (NOTE) [INTERNATIONAL COURT
OF JUSTICE]; 5. Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro
v. Italy) (Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) (NOTE)
[INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]; 6. Legality of Use of Force
(Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. Netherlands) (Provisional Measures)
(Preliminary Objections) (NOTE) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]; 7.
Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. Portugal)
(Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) (NOTE) [INTERNATIONAL COURT
OF JUSTICE]; 8. Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro
v. Spain) (Provisional Measures) (NOTE) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE];
9. Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. United
Kingdom) (Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) (NOTE)
[INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]; 10. Legality of Use of Force
(Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. United States of America) (Provisional
Measures) (NOTE) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]; 11. Indus Waters
Kishenganga Arbitration (Islamic Republic of Pakistan v. Republic of India)
(Final Award) [COURT OF ARBITRATION]; (see 150 ILR 311 and 154 ILR 1 for
previous stages of case); 12. Indus Waters Kishenganga Arbitration (Islamic
Republic of Pakistan v. Republic of India) (Decision on India's Request for
Clarification or Interpretation dated 20 May 2013) [COURT OF ARBITRATION];
(see 150 ILR 311 and 154 ILR 1 for previous stages of case); 13. M/V Louisa
(Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Kingdom of Spain) (Merits)
[INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA]; (provisional measures
published in 148 ILR 459); 14. General Comment No 22 on the Right to
Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion (Article 18) [UNITED NATIONS
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE]; 15. Yoon and Choi v. Korea (Communication Nos
1321/2004 and 1322/2004) [UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE]; 16. Jeong
and Others v. Korea (Communication Nos 1642-1741/2007) [UNITED NATIONS
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE]; 17. Atasoy and Sarkut v. Turkey (Communication Nos
1853/2008 and 1854/2008) [UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE] ; 18. Kim
and Others v. Korea (Communication No 1786/2008) [UNITED NATIONS HUMAN
RIGHTS COMMITTEE]; 19. Attorney General of Canada on behalf of United
States of America v. Khadr Court of Appeal for Ontario (2011 ONCA 358)
[CANADA]; 20. Re: Aerial Drone Deployment on 4 October 2010 in Mir Ali,
Pakistan (Case No 3 BJs 7/12-4) (Targeted Killing in Pakistan Case)
(Federal Prosecutor General) [GERMANY]; Decision to Terminate Proceedings.
(Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF
JUSTICE]; 2. Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v.
Canada) (Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) (NOTE)
[INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]; 3. Legality of Use of Force
(Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. France) (Provisional Measures)
(Preliminary Objections) (NOTE) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]; 4.
Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. Germany)
(Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) (NOTE) [INTERNATIONAL COURT
OF JUSTICE]; 5. Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro
v. Italy) (Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) (NOTE)
[INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]; 6. Legality of Use of Force
(Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. Netherlands) (Provisional Measures)
(Preliminary Objections) (NOTE) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]; 7.
Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. Portugal)
(Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) (NOTE) [INTERNATIONAL COURT
OF JUSTICE]; 8. Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro
v. Spain) (Provisional Measures) (NOTE) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE];
9. Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. United
Kingdom) (Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) (NOTE)
[INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]; 10. Legality of Use of Force
(Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. United States of America) (Provisional
Measures) (NOTE) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]; 11. Indus Waters
Kishenganga Arbitration (Islamic Republic of Pakistan v. Republic of India)
(Final Award) [COURT OF ARBITRATION]; (see 150 ILR 311 and 154 ILR 1 for
previous stages of case); 12. Indus Waters Kishenganga Arbitration (Islamic
Republic of Pakistan v. Republic of India) (Decision on India's Request for
Clarification or Interpretation dated 20 May 2013) [COURT OF ARBITRATION];
(see 150 ILR 311 and 154 ILR 1 for previous stages of case); 13. M/V Louisa
(Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Kingdom of Spain) (Merits)
[INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA]; (provisional measures
published in 148 ILR 459); 14. General Comment No 22 on the Right to
Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion (Article 18) [UNITED NATIONS
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE]; 15. Yoon and Choi v. Korea (Communication Nos
1321/2004 and 1322/2004) [UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE]; 16. Jeong
and Others v. Korea (Communication Nos 1642-1741/2007) [UNITED NATIONS
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE]; 17. Atasoy and Sarkut v. Turkey (Communication Nos
1853/2008 and 1854/2008) [UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE] ; 18. Kim
and Others v. Korea (Communication No 1786/2008) [UNITED NATIONS HUMAN
RIGHTS COMMITTEE]; 19. Attorney General of Canada on behalf of United
States of America v. Khadr Court of Appeal for Ontario (2011 ONCA 358)
[CANADA]; 20. Re: Aerial Drone Deployment on 4 October 2010 in Mir Ali,
Pakistan (Case No 3 BJs 7/12-4) (Targeted Killing in Pakistan Case)
(Federal Prosecutor General) [GERMANY]; Decision to Terminate Proceedings.