Paul H Robinson
Intuitions of Justice and the Utility of Desert
Paul H Robinson
Intuitions of Justice and the Utility of Desert
- Gebundenes Buch
- Merkliste
- Auf die Merkliste
- Bewerten Bewerten
- Teilen
- Produkt teilen
- Produkterinnerung
- Produkterinnerung
Research suggests that people of all demographics have nuanced and sophisticated notions of justice. Intuitions of Justice and the Utility of Desert sketches the contours of a wide range of lay judgments of justice, touching many if not most of the issues that penal code drafters or policy makers must face.
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
- Jacqueline S HodgsonThe Metamorphosis of Criminal Justice181,99 €
- Darryl K BrownFree Market Criminal Justice135,99 €
- Andrea D LyonThe Death Penalty63,99 €
- American Exceptionalism in Crime and Punishment115,99 €
- Miranda BevanChildren in Police Custody170,99 €
- Jessica S HenrySmoke But No Fire28,99 €
- Ursula KilkellyYouth Justice in Ireland70,99 €
-
-
-
Research suggests that people of all demographics have nuanced and sophisticated notions of justice. Intuitions of Justice and the Utility of Desert sketches the contours of a wide range of lay judgments of justice, touching many if not most of the issues that penal code drafters or policy makers must face.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Produktdetails
- Produktdetails
- Verlag: Oxford University Press
- Seitenzahl: 584
- Erscheinungstermin: 3. Mai 2013
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 239mm x 159mm x 37mm
- Gewicht: 996g
- ISBN-13: 9780199917723
- ISBN-10: 0199917728
- Artikelnr.: 36541887
- Herstellerkennzeichnung
- Libri GmbH
- Europaallee 1
- 36244 Bad Hersfeld
- 06621 890
- Verlag: Oxford University Press
- Seitenzahl: 584
- Erscheinungstermin: 3. Mai 2013
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 239mm x 159mm x 37mm
- Gewicht: 996g
- ISBN-13: 9780199917723
- ISBN-10: 0199917728
- Artikelnr.: 36541887
- Herstellerkennzeichnung
- Libri GmbH
- Europaallee 1
- 36244 Bad Hersfeld
- 06621 890
Paul H. Robinson is the Colin S. Diver Professor of Law at the University of Pennsylvania, and is a leading expert on criminal law. Professor Robinson holds law degrees from U.C.L.A., Harvard, and Cambridge. He has served as a federal prosecutor, as counsel for the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Criminal Law, and as one of the original commissioners of the U.S. Sentencing Commission. He is an editor of Criminal Law Conversations (Oxford 2009), and author of Distributive Principles of Criminal Law: Who Should Be Punished How Much? (Oxford 2008) and Law Without Justice: Why Criminal Law Doesn't Give People What They Deserve (Oxford 2005).
* Preface and Acknowledgments
* Selected Robinson Bibliography
* Part I. The Nature of Judgments About Justice
* Chapter 1. Judgments About Justice as Intuitional and Nuanced
* Chapter 2. Judgments About Justice as a Human Universal: Agreements
on a Core of Wrongdoing
* Chapter 3. The Origins of Shared Intuitions of Justice
* Chapter 4. Disagreements About Justice
* Chapter 5. Changing People's Judgments of Justice
* Part II. Should the Criminal Law Care What the Lay Person Thinks Is
Just?
* Chapter 6. Current Law's Deference to Lay Judgments of Justice
* Chapter 7. Current Law's Conflicts with Lay Judgments of Justice
* Chapter 8. Normative Crime Control: The Utility of Desert
* Chapter 9. Building Moral Credibility and the Disutility of Injustice
* Chapter 10. Deviations from Empirical Desert
* Chapter 11. Implications for Criminal Justice and Other Reform
* Part III. The Content of Lay Judgments of Justice
* Chapter 12. Rules of Conduct: Doctrines of Criminalization
* Chapter 13. Rules of Conduct: Doctrines of Justification
* Chapter 14. Principles of Adjudication: Doctrines of Culpability
* Chapter 15. Principles of Adjudication: Doctrines of Excuse
* Chapter 16. Principles of Adjudication: Doctrines of Grading
* Chapter 17. Law-Community Agreement and Conflict, and Its
Implications
* Part IV. Empirical Studies of Lay Judgments of Justice as a Law and
Policy Tool
* Chapter 18. Explaining History: Shifting Views of Criminality
* Chapter 19. Testing Competing Theories: Blackmail
* Chapter 20. Testing Competing Theories: Justification Defenses
* Chapter 21. Guiding Judicial Discretion: Extralegal Punishment
Factors
* Chapter 22. Intuitions of Justice and the Utility of Desert
* Selected Robinson Bibliography
* Part I. The Nature of Judgments About Justice
* Chapter 1. Judgments About Justice as Intuitional and Nuanced
* Chapter 2. Judgments About Justice as a Human Universal: Agreements
on a Core of Wrongdoing
* Chapter 3. The Origins of Shared Intuitions of Justice
* Chapter 4. Disagreements About Justice
* Chapter 5. Changing People's Judgments of Justice
* Part II. Should the Criminal Law Care What the Lay Person Thinks Is
Just?
* Chapter 6. Current Law's Deference to Lay Judgments of Justice
* Chapter 7. Current Law's Conflicts with Lay Judgments of Justice
* Chapter 8. Normative Crime Control: The Utility of Desert
* Chapter 9. Building Moral Credibility and the Disutility of Injustice
* Chapter 10. Deviations from Empirical Desert
* Chapter 11. Implications for Criminal Justice and Other Reform
* Part III. The Content of Lay Judgments of Justice
* Chapter 12. Rules of Conduct: Doctrines of Criminalization
* Chapter 13. Rules of Conduct: Doctrines of Justification
* Chapter 14. Principles of Adjudication: Doctrines of Culpability
* Chapter 15. Principles of Adjudication: Doctrines of Excuse
* Chapter 16. Principles of Adjudication: Doctrines of Grading
* Chapter 17. Law-Community Agreement and Conflict, and Its
Implications
* Part IV. Empirical Studies of Lay Judgments of Justice as a Law and
Policy Tool
* Chapter 18. Explaining History: Shifting Views of Criminality
* Chapter 19. Testing Competing Theories: Blackmail
* Chapter 20. Testing Competing Theories: Justification Defenses
* Chapter 21. Guiding Judicial Discretion: Extralegal Punishment
Factors
* Chapter 22. Intuitions of Justice and the Utility of Desert
* Preface and Acknowledgments
* Selected Robinson Bibliography
* Part I. The Nature of Judgments About Justice
* Chapter 1. Judgments About Justice as Intuitional and Nuanced
* Chapter 2. Judgments About Justice as a Human Universal: Agreements
on a Core of Wrongdoing
* Chapter 3. The Origins of Shared Intuitions of Justice
* Chapter 4. Disagreements About Justice
* Chapter 5. Changing People's Judgments of Justice
* Part II. Should the Criminal Law Care What the Lay Person Thinks Is
Just?
* Chapter 6. Current Law's Deference to Lay Judgments of Justice
* Chapter 7. Current Law's Conflicts with Lay Judgments of Justice
* Chapter 8. Normative Crime Control: The Utility of Desert
* Chapter 9. Building Moral Credibility and the Disutility of Injustice
* Chapter 10. Deviations from Empirical Desert
* Chapter 11. Implications for Criminal Justice and Other Reform
* Part III. The Content of Lay Judgments of Justice
* Chapter 12. Rules of Conduct: Doctrines of Criminalization
* Chapter 13. Rules of Conduct: Doctrines of Justification
* Chapter 14. Principles of Adjudication: Doctrines of Culpability
* Chapter 15. Principles of Adjudication: Doctrines of Excuse
* Chapter 16. Principles of Adjudication: Doctrines of Grading
* Chapter 17. Law-Community Agreement and Conflict, and Its
Implications
* Part IV. Empirical Studies of Lay Judgments of Justice as a Law and
Policy Tool
* Chapter 18. Explaining History: Shifting Views of Criminality
* Chapter 19. Testing Competing Theories: Blackmail
* Chapter 20. Testing Competing Theories: Justification Defenses
* Chapter 21. Guiding Judicial Discretion: Extralegal Punishment
Factors
* Chapter 22. Intuitions of Justice and the Utility of Desert
* Selected Robinson Bibliography
* Part I. The Nature of Judgments About Justice
* Chapter 1. Judgments About Justice as Intuitional and Nuanced
* Chapter 2. Judgments About Justice as a Human Universal: Agreements
on a Core of Wrongdoing
* Chapter 3. The Origins of Shared Intuitions of Justice
* Chapter 4. Disagreements About Justice
* Chapter 5. Changing People's Judgments of Justice
* Part II. Should the Criminal Law Care What the Lay Person Thinks Is
Just?
* Chapter 6. Current Law's Deference to Lay Judgments of Justice
* Chapter 7. Current Law's Conflicts with Lay Judgments of Justice
* Chapter 8. Normative Crime Control: The Utility of Desert
* Chapter 9. Building Moral Credibility and the Disutility of Injustice
* Chapter 10. Deviations from Empirical Desert
* Chapter 11. Implications for Criminal Justice and Other Reform
* Part III. The Content of Lay Judgments of Justice
* Chapter 12. Rules of Conduct: Doctrines of Criminalization
* Chapter 13. Rules of Conduct: Doctrines of Justification
* Chapter 14. Principles of Adjudication: Doctrines of Culpability
* Chapter 15. Principles of Adjudication: Doctrines of Excuse
* Chapter 16. Principles of Adjudication: Doctrines of Grading
* Chapter 17. Law-Community Agreement and Conflict, and Its
Implications
* Part IV. Empirical Studies of Lay Judgments of Justice as a Law and
Policy Tool
* Chapter 18. Explaining History: Shifting Views of Criminality
* Chapter 19. Testing Competing Theories: Blackmail
* Chapter 20. Testing Competing Theories: Justification Defenses
* Chapter 21. Guiding Judicial Discretion: Extralegal Punishment
Factors
* Chapter 22. Intuitions of Justice and the Utility of Desert