Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Rewards of Repression]( "Rewards of Repression")
Rewards of Repression32,99 €![The third mandate has revealed the true nature of Burundi's regime]( "The third mandate has revealed the true nature of Burundi's regime")
The third mandate has revealed the true nature of Burundi's regime22,99 €![Dynamics of Conflict]( "Dynamics of Conflict")
Dynamics of Conflict37,99 €![Political Repression]( "Political Repression")
Political Repression29,99 €![Dynamics of Conflict]( "Dynamics of Conflict")
Dynamics of Conflict60,99 €![Political Repression in the Soviet Union]( "Political Repression in the Soviet Union")
Political Repression in the Soviet Union22,99 €![Den Westen brechen]( "Den Westen brechen")
Den Westen brechen32,00 €
This book represents an important contribution to
the debate on the impact of foreign direct
investment on human rights in the Global South.
Political scientist, Amir Azarvan, assesses both
quantitatively and qualitatively - the effects of
FDI on socioeconomic well-being and physical
integrity rights in host countries.
Statistical analysis largely disconfirms the
neoliberal theory that FDI reduces the repression of
physical integrity rights over time. In contrast,
there is stronger evidence for the historical
structuralist theory that countries with large flows
of FDI are more repressive in times of domestic
unrest. Case study analysis largely supports these
statistical findings and, in the case of Algeria,
suggests ways to modify historical structuralism.
These findings thus constitute a challenge to what
appears to be an emerging neoliberal consensus in
the literature,and imply the need to more closely
regulate the activities of multinational
corporations.
the debate on the impact of foreign direct
investment on human rights in the Global South.
Political scientist, Amir Azarvan, assesses both
quantitatively and qualitatively - the effects of
FDI on socioeconomic well-being and physical
integrity rights in host countries.
Statistical analysis largely disconfirms the
neoliberal theory that FDI reduces the repression of
physical integrity rights over time. In contrast,
there is stronger evidence for the historical
structuralist theory that countries with large flows
of FDI are more repressive in times of domestic
unrest. Case study analysis largely supports these
statistical findings and, in the case of Algeria,
suggests ways to modify historical structuralism.
These findings thus constitute a challenge to what
appears to be an emerging neoliberal consensus in
the literature,and imply the need to more closely
regulate the activities of multinational
corporations.