This book challenges the idea that international law looks the same from anywhere in the world. Instead, how international lawyers understand and approach their field is often deeply influenced by the national contexts in which they lived, studied, and worked. International law in the United States and in the United Kingdom looks different compared to international law in China and Russia, though some approaches (particularly Western, Anglo-American ones) are moreinfluential outside their borders than others. Given shifts in geopolitical power and the rise of non-Western powers like China, it…mehr
This book challenges the idea that international law looks the same from anywhere in the world. Instead, how international lawyers understand and approach their field is often deeply influenced by the national contexts in which they lived, studied, and worked. International law in the United States and in the United Kingdom looks different compared to international law in China and Russia, though some approaches (particularly Western, Anglo-American ones) are moreinfluential outside their borders than others. Given shifts in geopolitical power and the rise of non-Western powers like China, it is increasingly important for international lawyers to understand how others coming from diverse backgrounds approach the field. By examining the international lawacademies and textbooks of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council, Roberts provides a window into these different communities of international lawyers, and she uncovers some of the similarities and differences in how they understand and approach international law.
Anthea Roberts is Associate Professor in the School of Regulation and Global Governance (RegNet) at the Australian National University. She specializes in public international law, investment treaty law and arbitration, and comparative international law. Anthea previously taught at the London School of Economics as well as Columbia and Harvard Law Schools. She is on the Editorial Boards of the American Journal of International Law, ICSID Review, and the Journal of World Investment and Trade, and blogs for EJIL: Talk! She has twice won the Francis Deák Prize for the best AJIL article by a younger scholar. Anthea serves as a Reporter for the Restatement (Fourth) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States, and has experience serving as an arbitrator, counsel, and expert in international disputes.
Inhaltsangabe
List of Figures List of Tables Foreword by Martii Koskenniemi Preface Acknowledgments Abbreviations 1: The Divisible College of International Lawyers I. Difference II. Dominance III. Disruption 2: Project Design I. General Framework II. The Actors and Materials Studied III. The States and Universities Studied IV. Important Concepts and Factors V. Three Points of Method 3: Comparing International Law Academics I. The Global Flow of Students and Ideas II. Comparing Educational Profiles III. Comparing Publication Placements IV. Comparing Links Between Academia and Practice 4: Comparing International Law Textbooks and Casebooks I. Preliminary Points of Method II. The Nationalized/Denationalized Divide III. Inconsistent Approaches IV. A Tendency to Look West V. A Lack of Diverse Comparativism VI. Divisions Between the Western and Non-Western Books VII. Divisions Between Western Books 5: Patterns of Difference and Dominance I. Comparing International Legal Academies II. Identifying Scholarly Silos and Attempts to Connect III. Identifying Patterns of Dominance 6: Disruptions Leading to a Competitive World Order I. Shifting to a Competitive World Order II. Disagreements in Practice, Not Just Words Conclusion Appendix A. Academics Included in the Study Appendix B. Scholars Referred to in Select Chinese and Russian International Law Textbooks Appendix C. Tables of Content for International Law Textbooks Appendix D. Chinese Research Funding by Topic Book Chapters Journal Articles and Book Reviews Newspapers, Magazines, and Blogs Cases Internet Sources Speeches and Audio Statutes, Government Statements and Decrees Other
List of Figures List of Tables Foreword by Martii Koskenniemi Preface Acknowledgments Abbreviations 1: The Divisible College of International Lawyers I. Difference II. Dominance III. Disruption 2: Project Design I. General Framework II. The Actors and Materials Studied III. The States and Universities Studied IV. Important Concepts and Factors V. Three Points of Method 3: Comparing International Law Academics I. The Global Flow of Students and Ideas II. Comparing Educational Profiles III. Comparing Publication Placements IV. Comparing Links Between Academia and Practice 4: Comparing International Law Textbooks and Casebooks I. Preliminary Points of Method II. The Nationalized/Denationalized Divide III. Inconsistent Approaches IV. A Tendency to Look West V. A Lack of Diverse Comparativism VI. Divisions Between the Western and Non-Western Books VII. Divisions Between Western Books 5: Patterns of Difference and Dominance I. Comparing International Legal Academies II. Identifying Scholarly Silos and Attempts to Connect III. Identifying Patterns of Dominance 6: Disruptions Leading to a Competitive World Order I. Shifting to a Competitive World Order II. Disagreements in Practice, Not Just Words Conclusion Appendix A. Academics Included in the Study Appendix B. Scholars Referred to in Select Chinese and Russian International Law Textbooks Appendix C. Tables of Content for International Law Textbooks Appendix D. Chinese Research Funding by Topic Book Chapters Journal Articles and Book Reviews Newspapers, Magazines, and Blogs Cases Internet Sources Speeches and Audio Statutes, Government Statements and Decrees Other
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Shop der buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg Amtsgericht Augsburg HRA 13309
