We often say that actions like murder and institutions like slavery are morally wrong. And sometimes people strenuously disagree about the moral status of actions, as with abortion. But what, if anything, makes statements about morality true? Should we be realists about morality, or anti-realists?
We often say that actions like murder and institutions like slavery are morally wrong. And sometimes people strenuously disagree about the moral status of actions, as with abortion. But what, if anything, makes statements about morality true? Should we be realists about morality, or anti-realists?
Matt Lutz is Associate Professor of Philosophy at Wuhan University, where he has worked since receiving his PhD in philosophy from the University of Southern California in 2015. He works on metaethics and epistemology, with a particular focus on moral epistemology and moral skepticism. Spencer Case received his PhD in philosophy from the University of Colorado Boulder in 2018, and teaches online classes there. He is also a freelance writer and podcaster.
Inhaltsangabe
1. Fact or opinion? 2. Anti-realism 3. Realism 4.The Moorean Argument 5. A Foothold for Realists 6. The Case for Error Theory 7. The Case for Skepticism 8. The Life of an Anti-Realist 9. Humeanism 10. Moral Explanations 11. Mooreanism and the a priori 12. Entanglement revisited
1. Fact or opinion? 2. Anti-realism 3. Realism 4.The Moorean Argument 5. A Foothold for Realists 6. The Case for Error Theory 7. The Case for Skepticism 8. The Life of an Anti-Realist 9. Humeanism 10. Moral Explanations 11. Mooreanism and the a priori 12. Entanglement revisited
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Shop der buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg Amtsgericht Augsburg HRA 13309