Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Protection of Federal Office Buildings Against Terrorism]( "Protection of Federal Office Buildings Against Terrorism")
Protection of Federal Office Buildings Against Terrorism46,99 €![Industrial Methods for the Effective Development and Testing of Defense Systems]( "Industrial Methods for the Effective Development and Testing of Defense Systems")
Industrial Methods for the Effective Development and Testing of Defense Systems40,99 €![Assessment of the Army Plan for the Pine Bluff Non-Stockpile Facility]( "Assessment of the Army Plan for the Pine Bluff Non-Stockpile Facility")
Assessment of the Army Plan for the Pine Bluff Non-Stockpile Facility33,99 €![Assessment to Enhance Air Force and Department of Defense Prototyping for the New Defense Strategy]( "Assessment to Enhance Air Force and Department of Defense Prototyping for the New Defense Strategy")
Assessment to Enhance Air Force and Department of Defense Prototyping for the New Defense Strategy34,99 €![2002 Assessment of the Office of Naval Research's Air and Surface Weapons Technology Program]( "2002 Assessment of the Office of Naval Research's Air and Surface Weapons Technology Program")
2002 Assessment of the Office of Naval Research's Air and Surface Weapons Technology Program33,99 €![Review Criteria for Successful Treatment of Hydrolysate at the Blue Grass Chemical Agent Destruction Pilot Plant]( "Review Criteria for Successful Treatment of Hydrolysate at the Blue Grass Chemical Agent Destruction Pilot Plant")
Review Criteria for Successful Treatment of Hydrolysate at the Blue Grass Chemical Agent Destruction Pilot Plant56,99 €![Assessment of the Office of Naval Research's Air and Surface Weapons Technology Program]( "Assessment of the Office of Naval Research's Air and Surface Weapons Technology Program")
Assessment of the Office of Naval Research's Air and Surface Weapons Technology Program24,99 €
In November 1999, GSA and the U.S. Department of State convened a symposium to discuss the apparently conflicting objectives of security from terrorist attack and the design of public buildings in an open society. The symposium sponsors rejected the notion of rigid, prescriptive design approaches. The symposium concluded with a challenge to the design and security professions to craft aesthetically appealing architectural solutions that achieve balanced, performance-based approaches to both openness and security. In response to a request from the Office of the Chief Architect of the Public Buildings Service, the National Research Council (NRC) assembled a panel of independent experts, the Committee to Review the Security Design Criteria of the Interagency Security Committee. This committee was tasked to evaluate the ISC Security Design Criteria to determine whether particular provisions might be too prescriptive to allow a design professional "reasonable flexibility" in achieving desired security and physical protection objectives.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.