Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Socio-Economic Rights within Constitutional Frameworks]( "Socio-Economic Rights within Constitutional Frameworks")
Socio-Economic Rights within Constitutional Frameworks29,99 €![The Role of Local Councils in the Socio-economic Development]( "The Role of Local Councils in the Socio-economic Development")
The Role of Local Councils in the Socio-economic Development39,99 €![Decentralization versus socio-economic development of citizens]( "Decentralization versus socio-economic development of citizens")
Decentralization versus socio-economic development of citizens36,99 €![The Convention for a Democratic South Africa and Socio-Economic Rights]( "The Convention for a Democratic South Africa and Socio-Economic Rights")
The Convention for a Democratic South Africa and Socio-Economic Rights29,99 €![Judicial Activism and Human Rights in Pakistan and India]( "Judicial Activism and Human Rights in Pakistan and India")
Judicial Activism and Human Rights in Pakistan and India51,99 €![COMPETENCE OF ETHIOPIAN COURTS TO ENTERTAIN SOCIO-ECONOMIC RIGHTS:]( "COMPETENCE OF ETHIOPIAN COURTS TO ENTERTAIN SOCIO-ECONOMIC RIGHTS:")
COMPETENCE OF ETHIOPIAN COURTS TO ENTERTAIN SOCIO-ECONOMIC RIGHTS:38,99 €![Judicial Activism and Individual Freedoms in the Constitutional State]( "Judicial Activism and Individual Freedoms in the Constitutional State")
Judicial Activism and Individual Freedoms in the Constitutional State32,99 €
It must from the outset be made clear that the concept of judicial activism does not lend itself to an exact definition. It has variously been defined as, a philosophy advocating that judges should interpret the Constitution to reflect contemporary conditions and values; when courts do not confine themselves to reasonable interpretations of law, but instead create law or when courts do not limit their ruling to the dispute before them, but instead establish a new rule to apply broadly to issues not presented in the specific action. At the core of the concept is the notion that in deciding a case judges may, or some advocate must, reform the law if the existing rules or principles appear defective. On such a view, judges should not hesitate to go beyond their traditional role as interpreters of the constitution and laws given to them by others in order to assume a role as independent policy makers or independent "trustees" on behalf of society. The array of existing disparate, even contradictory, ways of defining the concept has made its meaning increasingly unclear.