This book compares how and why the European Court of Justice, the French Cour de cassation and the United States Supreme Court offer different approaches for generating judicial accountability and control, judicial debate and deliberation, and ultimately judicial legitimacy.
This book compares how and why the European Court of Justice, the French Cour de cassation and the United States Supreme Court offer different approaches for generating judicial accountability and control, judicial debate and deliberation, and ultimately judicial legitimacy.
Mitchel de S.-O.-l'E. Lasser is a Visiting Professor at the Cornell Law School, and is Samuel D. Thurman Professor of Law at the University of Utah S. J. Quinney College of Law.
Inhaltsangabe
1: Introduction PART I: The Three Courts - Raw Analysis 2: The French Bifurcation 3: The American Unification 4: The European Union: Discursive Bifurcation Revisited PART II: Bifurcation 5: Similarity and Difference 6: France: How is the discursive bifurcation maintained? 7: The ECJ: The French bifurcation reworked PART III: Comparison 8: The Sliding Scales 9: Apples and Oranges 10: On Judicial Transparency, Control, and Accountability 11: On Judicial Debate, Deliberation, and Legitimacy 12: Concluding Postscript Bibliography
1: Introduction PART I: The Three Courts - Raw Analysis 2: The French Bifurcation 3: The American Unification 4: The European Union: Discursive Bifurcation Revisited PART II: Bifurcation 5: Similarity and Difference 6: France: How is the discursive bifurcation maintained? 7: The ECJ: The French bifurcation reworked PART III: Comparison 8: The Sliding Scales 9: Apples and Oranges 10: On Judicial Transparency, Control, and Accountability 11: On Judicial Debate, Deliberation, and Legitimacy 12: Concluding Postscript Bibliography
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Shop der buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg Amtsgericht Augsburg HRA 13309
