Mitchel de S -O -l'e Lasser

Judicial Deliberations

A Comparative Analysis of Judicial Transparency and Legitimacy

• Gebundenes Buch

Produktbeschreibung

This book compares how and why the European Court of Justice, the French Cour de cassation and the United States Supreme Court offer different approaches for generating judicial accountability and control, judicial debate and deliberation, and ultimately judicial legitimacy.

---

Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.

Produktdetails

• Verlag: Oxford University Press, USA
• Seitenzahl: 400
• Erscheinungstermin: 6. Januar 2005
• Englisch
• Abmessung: 234mm x 156mm x 22mm
• Gewicht: 730g
• ISBN-13: 9780199274123
• ISBN-10: 0199274126
• Artikelnr.: 21426210

Autorenporträt

Mitchel de S.-O.-l'E. Lasser is a Visiting Professor at the Cornell Law School, and is Samuel D. Thurman Professor of Law at the University of Utah S. J. Quinney College of Law.

Inhaltsangabe

1: Introduction
PART I: The Three Courts - Raw Analysis
2: The French Bifurcation
3: The American Unification
4: The European Union: Discursive Bifurcation Revisited
PART II: Bifurcation
5: Similarity and Difference
6: France: How is the discursive bifurcation maintained?
7: The ECJ: The French bifurcation reworked
PART III: Comparison
8: The Sliding Scales
9: Apples and Oranges
10: On Judicial Transparency, Control, and Accountability
11: On Judicial Debate, Deliberation, and Legitimacy
12: Concluding Postscript
Bibliography