The Norwegian constitution is the second oldest in the world and has much to teach the world about balancing the rule of law against majority rule. This is the story of Norwegian constitutionalism from 1814 onwards, told through Supreme Court cases reviewing legal statutes under the constitution and European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) law.
The Norwegian constitution is the second oldest in the world and has much to teach the world about balancing the rule of law against majority rule. This is the story of Norwegian constitutionalism from 1814 onwards, told through Supreme Court cases reviewing legal statutes under the constitution and European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) law.Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Anine Kierulf is Research Director at the Norwegian National Human Rights Institution.
Inhaltsangabe
1. Introduction 1.1. Background and context 1.2. Norway in a nutshell 1.3. Review under the constitution - and the ECHR 1.4. Book structure and terminology 2. Legal foundations and doctrinal specifics 2.1. Introduction 2.2. The Norwegian Supreme Court 2.3. The form of and basis for constitutional review 2.4. The basis for ECHR review 3. Foundations reviewed: the formative 1800s 3.1. Outline of a nation constituted 3.2. Courts, lawyers and background for judicial review 3.3. On not losing sight of (some) individuals 3.4. Review discussions prior to the 1866 case 3.5. The 1866 case 3.6. Arguments following 1866 3.7. Liberal constitutionalism defined 4. The emerging regulatory state and a constitutional watershed (early 1900s) 4.1. Constitutional questions arising - and discussed 4.2. The waterfall case 4.3. Legal opinions of 1912 and 1916 4.4. Legal opinions following the 1918 case 4.5. Parliamentary debates on review abolishment 4.6. Constitutional case adjourned 5. Post-WWII: social democratic constitutionalism?: 5.1. Introduction: review revival 5.2. Occupation and post-war adjudication 5.3. Regulatory reconstruction 5.4. Law, politics and history 5.5. Conquer and divide - preparing the expropriation statute 5.6. The Kløfta case 5.7. Kløfta case follow-up 5.8. Judicial review confirmed 6. Debates of ECHR review (1950-2000) 6.1. Introduction 6.2. 'Original intent' 6.3. On ECHR review prior to the HRA - the doctrine of clarity 6.4. Preparations for the human rights act of 1999 6.5. The power and democracy project 6.6. Post-national constitutionalism? 7. Dual review expressed (2000-2010) 7.1. Basis and case selection 7.2. Speech vs personality rights: reputation 7.3. Speech vs policy: political advertising 7.4. Free speech review: a synthesis of ideals? 8. A triple constitutional review revival: 2010 8.1. Prelude 8.2. 2010 Cases 8.3. 2010 Cases Debate and Follow up 8.4. Constitutional review reflections 9. 2014-2015: rights reform - and judicial review constitutionalization 9.1. The 2014 Constitutional Reform 9.2. Judicial review constitutionalization 9.3. Constitutional revitalization 9.4. Dual review constitutionalized 10. Looking back - and forward: 10.1. Legitimacy ideals disentangled 10.2. Political review challenges 10.3. Judicial review challenges 10.4. A bicentennial debate.
1. Introduction 1.1. Background and context 1.2. Norway in a nutshell 1.3. Review under the constitution - and the ECHR 1.4. Book structure and terminology 2. Legal foundations and doctrinal specifics 2.1. Introduction 2.2. The Norwegian Supreme Court 2.3. The form of and basis for constitutional review 2.4. The basis for ECHR review 3. Foundations reviewed: the formative 1800s 3.1. Outline of a nation constituted 3.2. Courts, lawyers and background for judicial review 3.3. On not losing sight of (some) individuals 3.4. Review discussions prior to the 1866 case 3.5. The 1866 case 3.6. Arguments following 1866 3.7. Liberal constitutionalism defined 4. The emerging regulatory state and a constitutional watershed (early 1900s) 4.1. Constitutional questions arising - and discussed 4.2. The waterfall case 4.3. Legal opinions of 1912 and 1916 4.4. Legal opinions following the 1918 case 4.5. Parliamentary debates on review abolishment 4.6. Constitutional case adjourned 5. Post-WWII: social democratic constitutionalism?: 5.1. Introduction: review revival 5.2. Occupation and post-war adjudication 5.3. Regulatory reconstruction 5.4. Law, politics and history 5.5. Conquer and divide - preparing the expropriation statute 5.6. The Kløfta case 5.7. Kløfta case follow-up 5.8. Judicial review confirmed 6. Debates of ECHR review (1950-2000) 6.1. Introduction 6.2. 'Original intent' 6.3. On ECHR review prior to the HRA - the doctrine of clarity 6.4. Preparations for the human rights act of 1999 6.5. The power and democracy project 6.6. Post-national constitutionalism? 7. Dual review expressed (2000-2010) 7.1. Basis and case selection 7.2. Speech vs personality rights: reputation 7.3. Speech vs policy: political advertising 7.4. Free speech review: a synthesis of ideals? 8. A triple constitutional review revival: 2010 8.1. Prelude 8.2. 2010 Cases 8.3. 2010 Cases Debate and Follow up 8.4. Constitutional review reflections 9. 2014-2015: rights reform - and judicial review constitutionalization 9.1. The 2014 Constitutional Reform 9.2. Judicial review constitutionalization 9.3. Constitutional revitalization 9.4. Dual review constitutionalized 10. Looking back - and forward: 10.1. Legitimacy ideals disentangled 10.2. Political review challenges 10.3. Judicial review challenges 10.4. A bicentennial debate.
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Internetauftritt der buecher.de internetstores GmbH
Geschäftsführung: Monica Sawhney | Roland Kölbl | Günter Hilger
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Batheyer Straße 115 - 117, 58099 Hagen
Postanschrift: Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg
Amtsgericht Hagen HRB 13257
Steuernummer: 321/5800/1497
USt-IdNr: DE450055826
