Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Law, Politics, and the Judicial Process in Canada, 5th Edition]( "Law, Politics, and the Judicial Process in Canada, 5th Edition")
Law, Politics, and the Judicial Process in Canada, 5th Edition93,99 €![Judicial Merit Selection: Institutional Design and Performance for State Courts]( "Judicial Merit Selection: Institutional Design and Performance for State Courts")
Judicial Merit Selection: Institutional Design and Performance for State Courts36,99 €![Judicial Law-Making in European Constitutional Courts]( "Judicial Law-Making in European Constitutional Courts")
Judicial Law-Making in European Constitutional Courts61,99 €![Power Without Law: The Supreme Court of Canada, the Marshall Decisions and the Failure of Judicial Activism]( "Power Without Law: The Supreme Court of Canada, the Marshall Decisions and the Failure of Judicial Activism")
Power Without Law: The Supreme Court of Canada, the Marshall Decisions and the Failure of Judicial Activism33,99 €![Bad Judgment: The Myths of First Nations Equality and Judicial Independence in Canada]( "Bad Judgment: The Myths of First Nations Equality and Judicial Independence in Canada")
Bad Judgment: The Myths of First Nations Equality and Judicial Independence in Canada22,99 €![The Doctrine of Judicial Review, its Legal and Historical Basis, and Other Essays]( "The Doctrine of Judicial Review, its Legal and Historical Basis, and Other Essays")
The Doctrine of Judicial Review, its Legal and Historical Basis, and Other Essays21,99 €![The Conflict Over Judicial Powers In The United States To 1870 (1909)]( "The Conflict Over Judicial Powers In The United States To 1870 (1909)")
The Conflict Over Judicial Powers In The United States To 1870 (1909)17,99 €
"All judges legitimize their decisions in writing, but US Supreme Court justices depend on public acceptance to a unique degree. Previous studies of judicial opinions have explored rhetorical strategies that produce legitimacy, but none have examined the laudatory, even operatic, forms of writing Supreme Court justices have used to justify fundamental rights decisions. Doug Coulson demonstrates that such "judicial rhapsodies" are not an aberration but a central feature of judicial discourse. First examining the classical origins of divisions between law and rhetoric, Coulson tracks what he calls an epideictic register--highly affective forms of expression that utilize hyperbole, amplification, and vocabularies of praise--through a surprising number of landmark Supreme Court opinions. Judicial Rhapsodies recovers and revalues these instances as significant to establishing and maintaining shared perspectives that form the basis for common experience and cooperation." -- back cover.