How do legal professionalism and politics influence efforts to structure the process of selecting and retaining state judges?Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Herbert M. Kritzer is the Marvin J. Sonosky Chair of Law and Public Policy at the University of Minnesota Law School. He is the author or coauthor of eight previous books, including Justices on the Ballot (Cambridge, 2015), and more than 100 articles or book chapters.
Inhaltsangabe
1. Introduction. The challenges of judicial selection and retention in the states 2. North Carolina: partisanship in the extreme 3. Arkansas: third time was the charm 4. West Virginia: change and chaos 5. Tennessee: unconstraining the Governor's choice of appellate judges 6. Georgia: nonpartisan elections as part of court modernization 7. Mississippi: a complex of factors 8. Utah: the two step 9. New Mexico: finding its own unique approach 10. Connecticut, Rhode Island, and South Carolina: adding 'merit' to nonelective systems 11. Florida and South Dakota: unsuccessful efforts to extend the Missouri Plan 12. Nevada and Ohio: voters say no to the Missouri Plan 13. Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Texas, and New Hampshire: talk, talk, talk, but no results 14. Missouri, Kansas, and Oklahoma: unsuccessful efforts to end 'merit' nominating commissions 15. Conclusion: what do we want in our judges?
1. Introduction. The challenges of judicial selection and retention in the states 2. North Carolina: partisanship in the extreme 3. Arkansas: third time was the charm 4. West Virginia: change and chaos 5. Tennessee: unconstraining the Governor's choice of appellate judges 6. Georgia: nonpartisan elections as part of court modernization 7. Mississippi: a complex of factors 8. Utah: the two step 9. New Mexico: finding its own unique approach 10. Connecticut, Rhode Island, and South Carolina: adding 'merit' to nonelective systems 11. Florida and South Dakota: unsuccessful efforts to extend the Missouri Plan 12. Nevada and Ohio: voters say no to the Missouri Plan 13. Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Texas, and New Hampshire: talk, talk, talk, but no results 14. Missouri, Kansas, and Oklahoma: unsuccessful efforts to end 'merit' nominating commissions 15. Conclusion: what do we want in our judges?
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Internetauftritt der buecher.de internetstores GmbH
Geschäftsführung: Monica Sawhney | Roland Kölbl | Günter Hilger
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Batheyer Straße 115 - 117, 58099 Hagen
Postanschrift: Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg
Amtsgericht Hagen HRB 13257
Steuernummer: 321/5800/1497
USt-IdNr: DE450055826
