79,00 €
inkl. MwSt.
Versandkostenfrei*
Sofort lieferbar
payback
0 °P sammeln
  • Buch

Drawing on archives gathered in the six founding member states of the European Union, this book offers a new perspective on the 'constitutionalization' of the European treaties, which was launched in the 1960s by the Court of Justice of the EU. By highlighting the professional and personal backgrounds of the first European judges and advocates general, its author studies the dynamics which prevailed within the institution during its 'revolutionary' years and analyzes the Court's relationship with the Member States of the European Communities. Through a detailed study of the selection process…mehr

Produktbeschreibung
Drawing on archives gathered in the six founding member states of the European Union, this book offers a new perspective on the 'constitutionalization' of the European treaties, which was launched in the 1960s by the Court of Justice of the EU. By highlighting the professional and personal backgrounds of the first European judges and advocates general, its author studies the dynamics which prevailed within the institution during its 'revolutionary' years and analyzes the Court's relationship with the Member States of the European Communities. Through a detailed study of the selection process of the members of the Court, it also provides new answers to the question of whether governments tried to put an end to its bold jurisprudence.En s'appuyant sur des archives rassemblées dans les six pays fondateurs de l'Union européenne, cet ouvrage propose un regard nouveau sur le « processus de constitutionnalisation » des traités européens lancé dans les années 1960 par la Cour de Justice de l'UE. En mettant en lumière les parcours professionnels et personnels des premiers juges et avocats généraux européens, il étudie les dynamiques qui règnent à l'intérieur de l'institution pendant ses années « révolutionnaires » et s'intéresse aux relations que la juridiction entretient avec les Etats membres. À travers une étude détaillée du processus de sélection des membres de la Cour, il apporte notamment des réponses inédites à la question de savoir si les gouvernements ont tenté de mettre un terme à sa jurisprudence audacieuse.