Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Jurisdiction in matters of extractive litigation]( "Jurisdiction in matters of extractive litigation")
Jurisdiction in matters of extractive litigation43,99 €![The universal jurisdiction of national courts over international crimes]( "The universal jurisdiction of national courts over international crimes")
The universal jurisdiction of national courts over international crimes44,99 €![The place of matrimonial regimes in Congolese and comparative law]( "The place of matrimonial regimes in Congolese and comparative law")
The place of matrimonial regimes in Congolese and comparative law29,99 €![The Referral of Matters to the Constitutional Council in Cameroon]( "The Referral of Matters to the Constitutional Council in Cameroon")
The Referral of Matters to the Constitutional Council in Cameroon49,99 €![Unworthiness and ingratitude in inheritance matters]( "Unworthiness and ingratitude in inheritance matters")
Unworthiness and ingratitude in inheritance matters44,99 €![The international law of cooperation in the face of pandemics:]( "The international law of cooperation in the face of pandemics:")
The international law of cooperation in the face of pandemics:39,99 €![The cause in contractual matters]( "The cause in contractual matters")
The cause in contractual matters29,99 €
The Brussels IIa Regulation is the fundamental tool for judicial cooperation in family law and it provides the necessary legal frame for uniform rules across Europe. Yet, uniformity of legal rules and their uniform interpretation through the decisions handed down by the Court of Justice of the European Union does not always suffice to achieve uniformity of solutions in family matters. This is especially true in regard to the very sensitive field of parental responsibility and the protection of minors. In fact, while the legal pattern may be comparatively simple, as it is built on the common and shared principles of the best interests of the child, the concrete application of rules (also) depends on a number of factual elements and circumstances, which are differently evaluated and balanced in the different jurisdictions, in accordance with the different social and cultural environment where such facts are displayed. Moreover, judges and lawyers not only adopt different approaches, but also have very different levels of knowledge of, and experience with, European Private International Law tools. As these differences lead to different outcomes despite the existence of a uniform legal source, they jeopardize the uniform application of the Regulation. Indeed, relevant legal analysis and empirical data show how application of the Regulation, as made by the courts of Member States, is far from consistent.