Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Killing Terrorists]( "Killing Terrorists")
Killing Terrorists71,99 €![The Philosophy of Human Rights]( "The Philosophy of Human Rights")
The Philosophy of Human Rights77,99 €![Ethics of Terrorism & Counter-Terrorism]( "Ethics of Terrorism & Counter-Terrorism")
Ethics of Terrorism & Counter-Terrorism120,99 €![Imagining Human Rights]( "Imagining Human Rights")
Imagining Human Rights102,99 €![Politischer Kosmopolitismus]( "Politischer Kosmopolitismus")
Politischer Kosmopolitismus129,95 €![Philosophy of Globalization]( "Philosophy of Globalization")
Philosophy of Globalization134,99 €![Verantwortung für historisches Unrecht]( "Verantwortung für historisches Unrecht")
Verantwortung für historisches Unrecht114,95 €
Targeted killing of terrorists has become an established practice in the fight against terrorism. The disturbing consequences of the practice and its increasing political and societal acceptance raise questions as to its justifiability and its place in counter-terrorism.
Anna Goppel explores whether targeted killing of terrorists can be justified, both from a moral and an international legal perspective. She discusses moral and international legal limits to state use of lethal force and argues that the moral principles and the international legal regulations allow for the practice only in very specific, very rare, and rather hypothetical cases. The analysis is based on a thorough discussion of the human right to life, the laws and ethics of war, and the relevant moral and legal arguments. This makes it of particular interest to philosophers and legal theorists interested in terrorism, counter-terrorism, human rights, and the legitimacy of defensive state measures.
Anna Goppel explores whether targeted killing of terrorists can be justified, both from a moral and an international legal perspective. She discusses moral and international legal limits to state use of lethal force and argues that the moral principles and the international legal regulations allow for the practice only in very specific, very rare, and rather hypothetical cases. The analysis is based on a thorough discussion of the human right to life, the laws and ethics of war, and the relevant moral and legal arguments. This makes it of particular interest to philosophers and legal theorists interested in terrorism, counter-terrorism, human rights, and the legitimacy of defensive state measures.