Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The Common and Counter-Hegemonic Politics]( "The Common and Counter-Hegemonic Politics")
The Common and Counter-Hegemonic Politics136,99 €![Hegemonic Stability Theory: The Rise and Fall of the US-Leadership in World Economic Relations]( "Hegemonic Stability Theory: The Rise and Fall of the US-Leadership in World Economic Relations")
Hegemonic Stability Theory: The Rise and Fall of the US-Leadership in World Economic Relations17,95 €![With A Little Help From My Friend - Foreign and Security Policy of the EU and the USA in Kosovo]( "With A Little Help From My Friend - Foreign and Security Policy of the EU and the USA in Kosovo")
With A Little Help From My Friend - Foreign and Security Policy of the EU and the USA in Kosovo27,95 €![The Main Challenges to the Hegemonic Position of Realism During the Cold War]( "The Main Challenges to the Hegemonic Position of Realism During the Cold War")
The Main Challenges to the Hegemonic Position of Realism During the Cold War15,95 €![Carl Schmitt¿s distinction between friend and enemy in the Colombian armed conflict]( "Carl Schmitt¿s distinction between friend and enemy in the Colombian armed conflict")
Carl Schmitt¿s distinction between friend and enemy in the Colombian armed conflict17,95 €![Possible Solutions for the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. Framework of Negotiations for a Hegemonic Coalition]( "Possible Solutions for the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. Framework of Negotiations for a Hegemonic Coalition")
Possible Solutions for the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. Framework of Negotiations for a Hegemonic Coalition17,95 €![Transatlantic Counter-Terrorism Cooperation]( "Transatlantic Counter-Terrorism Cooperation")
Transatlantic Counter-Terrorism Cooperation136,99 €
Seminar paper from the year 2004 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: Globalization, Political Economics, grade: 1,3 (A), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (Political Science), course: International Financial Institutions: Friend or Foe?, language: English, abstract: This paper tries to determine causes for the only limited impact of labor movement. First, I will outline the neo-Gramscian approach to International Political Economy with its central concepts of hegemony and counter-hegemony. From a neo-Gramscian perspective, the labor movement is regarded as a counterhegemonic project which tries to change the hegemonic institution WTO to its advantage. I will show that the need for a social clause arose from tensions within the neoliberal order. In the analysis, the focus will be on the thesis that the labor movement itself is too divided and therefore does not represent a uniform strategy which would be necessary for the building of counter-hegemony. More particularly, a deep division runs between North and South. I will set up the thesis that the perception of an antagonism between Northern and Southern interests is further fueled by nationalist populist movements in developed countries, which themselves have their origins the neoliberal mode of production. The Singapore Ministerial Conference of the WTO in 1996 is the background for discussion because the introduction of labor issues rejected then and further attempts to revive the debate have not led to other results yet1. The dominance of neoliberalism and the social forces of capital will be overviewed in short because they benefit from the current absence of labor standards and therefore oppose the counter-hegemonic movement. The results will be summarized in the conclusion chapter.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.