Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Making arbitration compatible with the public law legal regime]( "Making arbitration compatible with the public law legal regime")
Making arbitration compatible with the public law legal regime22,99 €![Sicherheit als Public Private Partnership]( "Sicherheit als Public Private Partnership")
Sicherheit als Public Private Partnership16,95 €![The Russian model of separation of powers. Constitutional grounds and practical realization]( "The Russian model of separation of powers. Constitutional grounds and practical realization")
The Russian model of separation of powers. Constitutional grounds and practical realization9,99 €![The Contribution of Judiciary to Transitional Justice following the 1996-2006 Conflict in Nepal]( "The Contribution of Judiciary to Transitional Justice following the 1996-2006 Conflict in Nepal")
The Contribution of Judiciary to Transitional Justice following the 1996-2006 Conflict in Nepal31,99 €![Sun Yat-Sen and Three Notable Chinese Characteristics within the Chinese Constitutions]( "Sun Yat-Sen and Three Notable Chinese Characteristics within the Chinese Constitutions")
Sun Yat-Sen and Three Notable Chinese Characteristics within the Chinese Constitutions27,95 €![The Law Of Partnership]( "The Law Of Partnership")
The Law Of Partnership46,99 €![The position of UAE law on drafting Model contracts]( "The position of UAE law on drafting Model contracts")
The position of UAE law on drafting Model contracts25,99 €
Essay from the year 2021 in the subject Law - Public Law / Constitutional Law / Basic Rights, grade: A, , language: English, abstract: The main topic of this paper is to frame a critique of the so-called partnership model in jurisdiction between the legislature and the judiciary-The hallmark of 19th and 20th century doctrines of interpretation has been that they premise themselves on the principle that a court ought to interpret law as it stands. The function of the court is to interpret the language of a statute, whereas it is for the legislature to make enactments and for the courts to enforce such enactments. Courts are not legislators, they have to carry out loyally the directions of the legislature. Two models of interpretation stands in present world, agency and partnership model. According to the agency model while interpreting a statute, the Court has to discover the intent of the legislature or the purpose behind legislation. The partnership model views the Court as a partner in legislative enterprise with legislature, hence, while interpreting a statute the Court should seek a sensible to avoid rigors of law. Judge does not create normative text but rather gives it meaning. The static vision of statutory interpretation prescribed by traditional doctrine is strikingly outdated. Interpretation of a statute evolves over time because of changing factual contexts and the changing perspectives of its interpreters. Statutory interpretation should appropriately balance a number of factors, including predictability and certainty, economic efficiency, fairness, and the public interest.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.