Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Constitutionality of Law without a Constitutional Court]( "Constitutionality of Law without a Constitutional Court")
Constitutionality of Law without a Constitutional Court127,99 €![Judicial Dissent in European Constitutional Courts]( "Judicial Dissent in European Constitutional Courts")
Judicial Dissent in European Constitutional Courts178,99 €![Constitutional and Administrative Law]( "Constitutional and Administrative Law")
Constitutional and Administrative Law54,99 €![Commonwealth Caribbean Public Law]( "Commonwealth Caribbean Public Law")
Commonwealth Caribbean Public Law87,99 €![Indirect Judicial Review in Administrative Law]( "Indirect Judicial Review in Administrative Law")
Indirect Judicial Review in Administrative Law114,99 €![The European Convention of Human Rights Regime]( "The European Convention of Human Rights Regime")
The European Convention of Human Rights Regime37,99 €![Law, Registration, and the State]( "Law, Registration, and the State")
Law, Registration, and the State124,99 €
Lawfare is a complex and evolving concept with many permutations. It is a term that is used to describe both a judicialisation of politics where the Constitutional Court is called upon to uphold constitutional responsibilities, compensating for institutional failures in the broader democratic space, and instances where there is abuse of the legal process to escape accountability. When the court is dragged into politics, it forces an examination of the legitimate scope of judicial review. This book explains how judicialisation of politics leads to the politicisation of adjudication and further weaponisation of the law. Exploring the judicial-political dynamics of South Africa from 2009 onwards, the work traces the consequences of the judicialisation of politics for institutional resilience and broader constitutional stability. Through an in-depth study of judicial legitimacy, the book seeks to provide an overarching theoretical justification for the dangers that inhere in lawfare. It analyses the potential costs of both judicial statesmanship and strategies of deference and avoidance when trying to navigate the Court safely through the era of lawfare. South Africa offers an interesting crucible within which to observe an unfolding global trend. Strengthened by its comparative focus, the implications of lawfare presented in this book transcend the South African context and are applicable to other jurisdictions in the world. The book will be of interest to researchers, academics and practitioners working in the areas of Constitutional Law and Politics.
'The judicialisation of politics carries a risk of weakening the independence of, and public respect for, the judiciary. This book contains a clear and accessible exposition of this important topic. It deserves the urgent attention of all interested in politics and justice in South Africa - both lawyers and laypeople.'
Richard Goldstone, Former Justice of the Constitutional Court of South Africa
'In this work the author conducts the first major analysis of the current "weaponization" of the judiciary. Though her analysis is largely focused on the South African judicial system, Dent applies a comparative approach that is very helpful to readers in the United State, the United Kingdom and elsewhere. In each of these systems political questions are increasingly being presented to judges and political pressures on courts as institutions for resolving extremely difficult political impasse are escalating. The book is highly recommended reading for jurists, lawyers and policy makers.'
Lawrence Baxter, Distinguished Professor Emeritus, Duke University'
'Kate Dent's analysis of lawfare in the judicial setting is extraordinarily original and constitutes an extremely important contribution to the scholarship of this phenomena. Though her discussion is set in the context of the South African judiciary, it has obvious implications for other jurisdictions. I highly recommend her book to anyone wanting to understand how law might be employed in the 21st century.'
Charles J. Dunlap, Jr., Major General, USAF (Ret.), Executive Director, Center on Law, Ethics and National Security, and Professor of the Practice of Law, Duke University School of Law
Richard Goldstone, Former Justice of the Constitutional Court of South Africa
'In this work the author conducts the first major analysis of the current "weaponization" of the judiciary. Though her analysis is largely focused on the South African judicial system, Dent applies a comparative approach that is very helpful to readers in the United State, the United Kingdom and elsewhere. In each of these systems political questions are increasingly being presented to judges and political pressures on courts as institutions for resolving extremely difficult political impasse are escalating. The book is highly recommended reading for jurists, lawyers and policy makers.'
Lawrence Baxter, Distinguished Professor Emeritus, Duke University'
'Kate Dent's analysis of lawfare in the judicial setting is extraordinarily original and constitutes an extremely important contribution to the scholarship of this phenomena. Though her discussion is set in the context of the South African judiciary, it has obvious implications for other jurisdictions. I highly recommend her book to anyone wanting to understand how law might be employed in the 21st century.'
Charles J. Dunlap, Jr., Major General, USAF (Ret.), Executive Director, Center on Law, Ethics and National Security, and Professor of the Practice of Law, Duke University School of Law