Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![EFFECTS OF ADVANCE ORGANIZERS ON LEARNING AND RETENTION]( "EFFECTS OF ADVANCE ORGANIZERS ON LEARNING AND RETENTION")
EFFECTS OF ADVANCE ORGANIZERS ON LEARNING AND RETENTION38,99 €![Experiential Learning Styles and Instructional Delivery]( "Experiential Learning Styles and Instructional Delivery")
Experiential Learning Styles and Instructional Delivery38,99 €![Blended Learning versus Traditional Face-to-face Learning]( "Blended Learning versus Traditional Face-to-face Learning")
Blended Learning versus Traditional Face-to-face Learning32,99 €![Multimodal Design for Blended Course Delivery]( "Multimodal Design for Blended Course Delivery")
Multimodal Design for Blended Course Delivery44,99 €![School-community partnerships and Retention of students in schools]( "School-community partnerships and Retention of students in schools")
School-community partnerships and Retention of students in schools32,99 €![Motivation in Traditional and Montessori School Environments]( "Motivation in Traditional and Montessori School Environments")
Motivation in Traditional and Montessori School Environments32,99 €![Improving Reading Achievement and Attitudes through Accelerated Reader]( "Improving Reading Achievement and Attitudes through Accelerated Reader")
Improving Reading Achievement and Attitudes through Accelerated Reader32,99 €
This Project was a study comparing the learning and
retention of two different course delivery systems;
a nine day accelerated format and a thirteen week
traditional format. The course was given at an
American Bar Association accreditated law school in
Chicago, Illinois. Students consisted of second year
and third year law students at the school and the
course was a requirment for graduation from the
program. Two cohorts of groups, an August and
January cohort for the accelerated group and Fall
and Spring Semester cohort for the traditional group
in the 2005-6 academic year, were compared using a
peer reviewed, Likert based survey instrument given
within one week of course completion and again four
months after course completion. The results of the
survey were compared using T-tests. The resulting T-
test revealed no statistically significant learning
or retention differences between the two groups.
retention of two different course delivery systems;
a nine day accelerated format and a thirteen week
traditional format. The course was given at an
American Bar Association accreditated law school in
Chicago, Illinois. Students consisted of second year
and third year law students at the school and the
course was a requirment for graduation from the
program. Two cohorts of groups, an August and
January cohort for the accelerated group and Fall
and Spring Semester cohort for the traditional group
in the 2005-6 academic year, were compared using a
peer reviewed, Likert based survey instrument given
within one week of course completion and again four
months after course completion. The results of the
survey were compared using T-tests. The resulting T-
test revealed no statistically significant learning
or retention differences between the two groups.