Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Powers and Abilities in Early Modern Philosophy]( "Powers and Abilities in Early Modern Philosophy")
Powers and Abilities in Early Modern Philosophy123,99 €![Consciousness, Time, and Scepticism in Hume's Thought]( "Consciousness, Time, and Scepticism in Hume's Thought")
Consciousness, Time, and Scepticism in Hume's Thought123,99 €![Epistemic Duties]( "Epistemic Duties")
Epistemic Duties37,99 €![Social Epistemology and Relativism]( "Social Epistemology and Relativism")
Social Epistemology and Relativism37,99 €![The Ethics, Epistemology, and Politics of Richard Rorty]( "The Ethics, Epistemology, and Politics of Richard Rorty")
The Ethics, Epistemology, and Politics of Richard Rorty37,99 €![Scientific Challenges to Common Sense Philosophy]( "Scientific Challenges to Common Sense Philosophy")
Scientific Challenges to Common Sense Philosophy37,99 €![Freedom, Action, and Motivation in Spinoza's]( "Freedom, Action, and Motivation in Spinoza's")
Freedom, Action, and Motivation in Spinoza's "Ethics"37,99 €
This book provides a systematic treatment of Locke's theory of probable assent, and shows how the theory applies to Locke's philosophy of science, moral epistemology, and religious epistemology.
There is a powerful case to be made that the most important dimension of Locke's philosophy is his theory of rational probable assent, rather than his theory of knowledge. According to Locke, we largely live our lives in the "twilight of probability" rather than in "the sunshine of certain knowledge." Locke's theory of probable assent has far-reaching significance insofar as it contains a wealth of novel, independently interesting, and prescient elements that precede the modern field of formal epistemology. In this book, the author argues for the central role of probable assent in Locke's philosophy. Locke's theory of probable assent is based on an epistemic modesty that claims, roughly, that our cognitive abilities are limited and that we ought to carry ourselves in believing with due caution. This modesty motivates the author's discussion of other aspects of Locke's epistemology, notably his principle of proportionality, his doxastic involuntarism, his epistemological pragmatism, and his theory of testimony. The book concludes by connecting the theory of probable assent with Locke's views on the limits of science, moral epistemology, and the rationality of faith.
Locke's Twilight of Probability will appeal to scholars and advanced students working on Locke and the history of early modern philosophy.
There is a powerful case to be made that the most important dimension of Locke's philosophy is his theory of rational probable assent, rather than his theory of knowledge. According to Locke, we largely live our lives in the "twilight of probability" rather than in "the sunshine of certain knowledge." Locke's theory of probable assent has far-reaching significance insofar as it contains a wealth of novel, independently interesting, and prescient elements that precede the modern field of formal epistemology. In this book, the author argues for the central role of probable assent in Locke's philosophy. Locke's theory of probable assent is based on an epistemic modesty that claims, roughly, that our cognitive abilities are limited and that we ought to carry ourselves in believing with due caution. This modesty motivates the author's discussion of other aspects of Locke's epistemology, notably his principle of proportionality, his doxastic involuntarism, his epistemological pragmatism, and his theory of testimony. The book concludes by connecting the theory of probable assent with Locke's views on the limits of science, moral epistemology, and the rationality of faith.
Locke's Twilight of Probability will appeal to scholars and advanced students working on Locke and the history of early modern philosophy.