Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![KOSTENGÜNSTIGE AUTOMATISCHE BEWÄSSERUNG IN FAMILIENBETRIEBEN]( "KOSTENGÜNSTIGE AUTOMATISCHE BEWÄSSERUNG IN FAMILIENBETRIEBEN")
KOSTENGÜNSTIGE AUTOMATISCHE BEWÄSSERUNG IN FAMILIENBETRIEBEN43,90 €![Kenntnisse über Bewässerungsmethoden im Distrikt Kanyakumari]( "Kenntnisse über Bewässerungsmethoden im Distrikt Kanyakumari")
Kenntnisse über Bewässerungsmethoden im Distrikt Kanyakumari54,90 €![Schnitt Gerbera Bewässerung]( "Schnitt Gerbera Bewässerung")
Schnitt Gerbera Bewässerung49,90 €![Low Cost Preservation of Indian Butter Catfish]( "Low Cost Preservation of Indian Butter Catfish")
Low Cost Preservation of Indian Butter Catfish36,99 €![Low cost solar dryer for vegetables and fruits]( "Low cost solar dryer for vegetables and fruits")
Low cost solar dryer for vegetables and fruits26,99 €![Low Cost Communication Package und seine Auswirkungen auf das Unternehmertum]( "Low Cost Communication Package und seine Auswirkungen auf das Unternehmertum")
Low Cost Communication Package und seine Auswirkungen auf das Unternehmertum43,90 €![Low Cost Communication Package And Its Effects On Entrepreneurship]( "Low Cost Communication Package And Its Effects On Entrepreneurship")
Low Cost Communication Package And Its Effects On Entrepreneurship29,99 €
The objective of the work was to evaluate different methods of irrigation management in the development of the plant and productivity of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) culture in the conditions of Parauapebas - PA. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse, with 4 treatments (a traditional treatment with fixed amount of water per day [1], an Irrigas sensor-assisted treatment [1], an Arduino-controlled treatment with one daily irrigation [3] and an Arduino-controlled treatment with two daily irrigations [4]). An entirely randomized design with 6 repetitions per treatment was adopted. The following variables were evaluated: number of fruits, total weight harvested per plant and plant height and, from these, the productivity. There was no significant difference (P<0.05) in any of the variables and, with the exception of plant height, all had normal distributions.