Jelle O. Barentsz, Frans M. J. Debruyne, J. H. J. Ruijs
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Carcinoma of the Urinary Bladder
Jelle O. Barentsz, Frans M. J. Debruyne, J. H. J. Ruijs
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Carcinoma of the Urinary Bladder
- Gebundenes Buch
- Merkliste
- Auf die Merkliste
- Bewerten Bewerten
- Teilen
- Produkt teilen
- Produkterinnerung
- Produkterinnerung
Carcinoma of the urinary bladder is a common (in the USA it is the fifth most common form of cancer in males and tenth most common form of cancer in females) malignan cy and one in which noninvasive staging by imaging plays such an important role. This book presents a complete approach to MR imaging of carcinoma of the urinary bladder from a detailed discussion of the value of MRI in the diagnosis of the urinary bladder to the history of the procedure. The technical discussion of the general principles of MRI including the optimal pulse sequences to be used and factors that influence the…mehr
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
- Jelle O. BarentszMagnetic Resonance Imaging of Carcinoma of the Urinary Bladder42,99 €
- Ernst E. van der WallNuclear Cardiology and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance112,99 €
- Carcinoma of the Bladder74,99 €
- Richard C. Reba / David J. Goodenough / H.F. Davidson (Hgg.)Diagnostic Imaging in Medicine112,99 €
- Pierre-Marie RobitailleUltra High Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging245,99 €
- Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Oncology235,39 €
- Imaging of the Pancreas178,99 €
-
-
-
Carcinoma of the urinary bladder is a common (in the USA it is the fifth most common form of cancer in males and tenth most common form of cancer in females) malignan cy and one in which noninvasive staging by imaging plays such an important role. This book presents a complete approach to MR imaging of carcinoma of the urinary bladder from a detailed discussion of the value of MRI in the diagnosis of the urinary bladder to the history of the procedure. The technical discussion of the general principles of MRI including the optimal pulse sequences to be used and factors that influence the quality of images are included in this book. The safety factors are also presented along with contraindications. The application of a double surface coil with the field strength of O.5T provides the fine quality of the illustrations. The atlas of comparative anatomy by MRI on normal volunteers and post-mo'rtem specimens as well as MR images on patients with bladder tumors and post-surgery specimens is unique. The results of the clinical imaging stu dies in patients with carcinoma of the bladder, comparing the relative value of clinical staging, MR, CT and lymphography, are helpful in showing the advantages of MRI.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Produktdetails
- Produktdetails
- Series in Radiology 21
- Verlag: Springer / Springer Netherlands
- Artikelnr. des Verlages: 978-0-7923-0838-6
- 1990.
- Seitenzahl: 136
- Erscheinungstermin: 31. August 1990
- Englisch
- Gewicht: 700g
- ISBN-13: 9780792308386
- ISBN-10: 0792308387
- Artikelnr.: 24450563
- Herstellerkennzeichnung
- Libri GmbH
- Europaallee 1
- 36244 Bad Hersfeld
- 06621 890
- Series in Radiology 21
- Verlag: Springer / Springer Netherlands
- Artikelnr. des Verlages: 978-0-7923-0838-6
- 1990.
- Seitenzahl: 136
- Erscheinungstermin: 31. August 1990
- Englisch
- Gewicht: 700g
- ISBN-13: 9780792308386
- ISBN-10: 0792308387
- Artikelnr.: 24450563
- Herstellerkennzeichnung
- Libri GmbH
- Europaallee 1
- 36244 Bad Hersfeld
- 06621 890
I. Introduction.- 1.1 Magnetic spin tomography.- 1.2 Carcinoma of the urinary bladder.- 1.3 Diagnostic imaging of carcinoma of the urinary bladder.- 1.4 Aims and design of this study.- II. General Principles Of MRI.- 2.1 Introduction.- 2.2 Basic physics of MRI.- 2.3 Image contrast.- 2.4 Strength of the magnetic field.- 2.5 Artifacts.- 2.6 Advantages of MRI over other imaging techniques.- 2.7 Disadvantages of MRI compared with other imaging techniques.- 2.8 Safety of MRI.- 2.9 Contraindications for MRI investigation.- III. Technical Aspects of Mri Specificially Relevant to Patients with Urinary Bladder Carcinoma.- 3.1 Introduction, optimal conditions for examination.- 3.2 Patient-related factors.- 3.3 Pulse sequence optimization.- 3.4 Body-coil MRI versus (double) surface-coil MRI.- 3.5 Comparison of staging results at 0.5 T and 1.5 T.- 3.6 Conclusion and protocol to be followed.- IV. Normal Mr Images: Correlation With Known Anatomic Proportions.- 4.1 Normal MR images of the pelvis.- 4.2 Correlation of MR images with anatomic sections.- 4.3 Correlations of MR images with sections of resected specimens.- V. Staging of Carcinoma of the Urinary Bladder on the Basis of MRI Results.- 5.1 Introduction.- 5.2 Evaluation of MRI, CT, and the clinical staging method compared with postoperative histopathologic staging based on cystectomy and autopsy specimens.- 5.3. Evaluation of staging with MRI and CT by using a combination of clinical staging and follow-up as a reference.- 5.4 Evaluation of staging with MRI by using a combination of clinical staging and follow-up as a reference.- VI. Discussion, Conclusions and Future Perspectives.- 6.1 Discussion and conclusions.- 6.2 Future prospects.- VII. Summary.- References.
I. Introduction.
1.1 Magnetic spin tomography.
1.2 Carcinoma of the urinary bladder.
1.2.1 General aspects.
1.2.2 Method of clinical staging.
1.3 Diagnostic imaging of carcinoma of the urinary bladder.
1.3.1 Intravenous urography.
1.3.2 Ultrasound.
1.3.3 Computed Tomography.
1.3.4 Lymphography.
1.3.5 Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
1.4 Aims and design of this study.
II. General Principles Of MRI.
2.1 Introduction.
2.2 Basic physics of MRI.
2.2.1 Nuclear spins, resonant frequency.
2.2.2 Spin imaging: proton density, T1 and T2 relaxation times.
2.3 Image contrast.
2.3.1 'Inherent' tissue contrast, image contrast.
2.3.2 Adjustable factors, pulse sequences.
2.3.2.1 Spin
echo pulse sequence.
2.3.2.2 Inversion recovery pulse sequence.
2.3.2.3 Pulse sequence optimization.
2.4 Strength of the magnetic field.
2.5 Artifacts.
2.5.1 Aliasing (wraparound) artifact.
2.5.2 Fat
shift artifact.
2.5.3 Artifacts caused by patients' movement.
2.5.4 Metal artifacts.
2.6 Advantages of MRI over other imaging techniques.
2.7 Disadvantages of MRI compared with other imaging techniques.
2.8 Safety of MRI.
2.8.1 Short term effects.
2.8.1.1 Static magnetic field.
8.1.2 Effects of electrical currents induced by the main magnetic field varying in time.
2.8.1.3 Warming/heating effects of RF signals.
2.8.2 Long
term effects.
2.9 Contraindications for MRI investigation.
III. Technical Aspects of Mri Specificially Relevant to Patients with Urinary Bladder Carcinoma.
3.1 Introduction, optimal conditions for examination.
3.2 Patient
related factors.
3.2.1 Voluntary motion artifacts.
3.2.2 Involuntary motion artifacts.
3.2.3 Bladder distension.
3.3 Pulse sequence optimization.
3.3.1 Literature review.
3.3.2 Evaluation of sequences most frequently used in the literature.
3.3.2.1 T1
weighted sequences.
3.3.2.2 T2
weighted sequences.
3.3.2.3 Proton
weighted sequences.
3.3.3 Determination of the optimal pulse sequence (1.5 T).
3.3.3.1 T1 and T2 calculations to optimize the pulse sequence.
3.3.3.2 Pulse sequence optimization by means of 'contrast matrices'.
3.3.3.3 Pulse sequence optimization by means of 'synthetic imaging'.
3.3.4 Interim conclusion.
3.4 Body
coil MRI versus (double) surface
coil MRI.
3.4.1 Results at a field strength of 0.5 T.
3.4.1.1 Patients and methods.
3.4.1.2 Results.
3.4.1.3 Discussion.
3.4.2 Results at a field strength of 1.5 T.
3.4.2.1 Patients and methods.
3.4.2.2 Results.
3.4.2.3 Discussion.
3.4.3 Interim conclusion.
3.5 Comparison of staging results at 0.5 T and 1.5 T.
3.5.1 Introduction.
3.5.2 Patients, methods, and results.
3.5.3 Discussion.
3.6 Conclusion and protocol to be followed.
IV. Normal Mr Images: Correlation With Known Anatomic Proportions.
4.1 Normal MR images of the pelvis.
4.1.1 The male pelvis.
4.1.2 The female pelvis.
4.2 Correlation of MR images with anatomic sections.
4.3 Correlations of MR images with sections of resected specimens.
V. Staging of Carcinoma of the Urinary Bladder on the Basis of MRI Results.
5.1 Introduction.
5.1.1 Survey of groups of patient.
5.2 Evaluation of MRI, CT, and the clinical staging method compared with postoperative histopathologic staging based on cystectomy and autopsy specimens.
5.2.1 Patients and methods.
5.2.2 Results.
5.2.2.1 Patients.
5.2.2.2 MR images of resected specimens.
5.2.3 Discussion.
5.2.4 Interim conclusion.
5.3. Evaluation of staging with MRI and CT by using a combination of clinical staging and follow
up as a reference.
5.3.1 Patients and methods.
5.3.2 Results.
5.3.3 Discussion.
5.3.4 Interim conclusion.
5.4 Evaluation of staging with MRI by using a combination of clinical staging and follow
up as a reference.
5.4.1 Patients, methods, and results.
5.4.2 Discussion 101 5.4.3. Interim conclusion.
VI. Discussion, Conclusions and Future Perspectives.
6.1 Discussion and conclusions.
6.2 Future prospects.
6.2.1 Surface coils.
6.2.2 Contrast agents.
6.2.3 Fast sequences.
VII. Summary.
References.
1.1 Magnetic spin tomography.
1.2 Carcinoma of the urinary bladder.
1.2.1 General aspects.
1.2.2 Method of clinical staging.
1.3 Diagnostic imaging of carcinoma of the urinary bladder.
1.3.1 Intravenous urography.
1.3.2 Ultrasound.
1.3.3 Computed Tomography.
1.3.4 Lymphography.
1.3.5 Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
1.4 Aims and design of this study.
II. General Principles Of MRI.
2.1 Introduction.
2.2 Basic physics of MRI.
2.2.1 Nuclear spins, resonant frequency.
2.2.2 Spin imaging: proton density, T1 and T2 relaxation times.
2.3 Image contrast.
2.3.1 'Inherent' tissue contrast, image contrast.
2.3.2 Adjustable factors, pulse sequences.
2.3.2.1 Spin
echo pulse sequence.
2.3.2.2 Inversion recovery pulse sequence.
2.3.2.3 Pulse sequence optimization.
2.4 Strength of the magnetic field.
2.5 Artifacts.
2.5.1 Aliasing (wraparound) artifact.
2.5.2 Fat
shift artifact.
2.5.3 Artifacts caused by patients' movement.
2.5.4 Metal artifacts.
2.6 Advantages of MRI over other imaging techniques.
2.7 Disadvantages of MRI compared with other imaging techniques.
2.8 Safety of MRI.
2.8.1 Short term effects.
2.8.1.1 Static magnetic field.
8.1.2 Effects of electrical currents induced by the main magnetic field varying in time.
2.8.1.3 Warming/heating effects of RF signals.
2.8.2 Long
term effects.
2.9 Contraindications for MRI investigation.
III. Technical Aspects of Mri Specificially Relevant to Patients with Urinary Bladder Carcinoma.
3.1 Introduction, optimal conditions for examination.
3.2 Patient
related factors.
3.2.1 Voluntary motion artifacts.
3.2.2 Involuntary motion artifacts.
3.2.3 Bladder distension.
3.3 Pulse sequence optimization.
3.3.1 Literature review.
3.3.2 Evaluation of sequences most frequently used in the literature.
3.3.2.1 T1
weighted sequences.
3.3.2.2 T2
weighted sequences.
3.3.2.3 Proton
weighted sequences.
3.3.3 Determination of the optimal pulse sequence (1.5 T).
3.3.3.1 T1 and T2 calculations to optimize the pulse sequence.
3.3.3.2 Pulse sequence optimization by means of 'contrast matrices'.
3.3.3.3 Pulse sequence optimization by means of 'synthetic imaging'.
3.3.4 Interim conclusion.
3.4 Body
coil MRI versus (double) surface
coil MRI.
3.4.1 Results at a field strength of 0.5 T.
3.4.1.1 Patients and methods.
3.4.1.2 Results.
3.4.1.3 Discussion.
3.4.2 Results at a field strength of 1.5 T.
3.4.2.1 Patients and methods.
3.4.2.2 Results.
3.4.2.3 Discussion.
3.4.3 Interim conclusion.
3.5 Comparison of staging results at 0.5 T and 1.5 T.
3.5.1 Introduction.
3.5.2 Patients, methods, and results.
3.5.3 Discussion.
3.6 Conclusion and protocol to be followed.
IV. Normal Mr Images: Correlation With Known Anatomic Proportions.
4.1 Normal MR images of the pelvis.
4.1.1 The male pelvis.
4.1.2 The female pelvis.
4.2 Correlation of MR images with anatomic sections.
4.3 Correlations of MR images with sections of resected specimens.
V. Staging of Carcinoma of the Urinary Bladder on the Basis of MRI Results.
5.1 Introduction.
5.1.1 Survey of groups of patient.
5.2 Evaluation of MRI, CT, and the clinical staging method compared with postoperative histopathologic staging based on cystectomy and autopsy specimens.
5.2.1 Patients and methods.
5.2.2 Results.
5.2.2.1 Patients.
5.2.2.2 MR images of resected specimens.
5.2.3 Discussion.
5.2.4 Interim conclusion.
5.3. Evaluation of staging with MRI and CT by using a combination of clinical staging and follow
up as a reference.
5.3.1 Patients and methods.
5.3.2 Results.
5.3.3 Discussion.
5.3.4 Interim conclusion.
5.4 Evaluation of staging with MRI by using a combination of clinical staging and follow
up as a reference.
5.4.1 Patients, methods, and results.
5.4.2 Discussion 101 5.4.3. Interim conclusion.
VI. Discussion, Conclusions and Future Perspectives.
6.1 Discussion and conclusions.
6.2 Future prospects.
6.2.1 Surface coils.
6.2.2 Contrast agents.
6.2.3 Fast sequences.
VII. Summary.
References.
I. Introduction.- 1.1 Magnetic spin tomography.- 1.2 Carcinoma of the urinary bladder.- 1.3 Diagnostic imaging of carcinoma of the urinary bladder.- 1.4 Aims and design of this study.- II. General Principles Of MRI.- 2.1 Introduction.- 2.2 Basic physics of MRI.- 2.3 Image contrast.- 2.4 Strength of the magnetic field.- 2.5 Artifacts.- 2.6 Advantages of MRI over other imaging techniques.- 2.7 Disadvantages of MRI compared with other imaging techniques.- 2.8 Safety of MRI.- 2.9 Contraindications for MRI investigation.- III. Technical Aspects of Mri Specificially Relevant to Patients with Urinary Bladder Carcinoma.- 3.1 Introduction, optimal conditions for examination.- 3.2 Patient-related factors.- 3.3 Pulse sequence optimization.- 3.4 Body-coil MRI versus (double) surface-coil MRI.- 3.5 Comparison of staging results at 0.5 T and 1.5 T.- 3.6 Conclusion and protocol to be followed.- IV. Normal Mr Images: Correlation With Known Anatomic Proportions.- 4.1 Normal MR images of the pelvis.- 4.2 Correlation of MR images with anatomic sections.- 4.3 Correlations of MR images with sections of resected specimens.- V. Staging of Carcinoma of the Urinary Bladder on the Basis of MRI Results.- 5.1 Introduction.- 5.2 Evaluation of MRI, CT, and the clinical staging method compared with postoperative histopathologic staging based on cystectomy and autopsy specimens.- 5.3. Evaluation of staging with MRI and CT by using a combination of clinical staging and follow-up as a reference.- 5.4 Evaluation of staging with MRI by using a combination of clinical staging and follow-up as a reference.- VI. Discussion, Conclusions and Future Perspectives.- 6.1 Discussion and conclusions.- 6.2 Future prospects.- VII. Summary.- References.
I. Introduction.
1.1 Magnetic spin tomography.
1.2 Carcinoma of the urinary bladder.
1.2.1 General aspects.
1.2.2 Method of clinical staging.
1.3 Diagnostic imaging of carcinoma of the urinary bladder.
1.3.1 Intravenous urography.
1.3.2 Ultrasound.
1.3.3 Computed Tomography.
1.3.4 Lymphography.
1.3.5 Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
1.4 Aims and design of this study.
II. General Principles Of MRI.
2.1 Introduction.
2.2 Basic physics of MRI.
2.2.1 Nuclear spins, resonant frequency.
2.2.2 Spin imaging: proton density, T1 and T2 relaxation times.
2.3 Image contrast.
2.3.1 'Inherent' tissue contrast, image contrast.
2.3.2 Adjustable factors, pulse sequences.
2.3.2.1 Spin
echo pulse sequence.
2.3.2.2 Inversion recovery pulse sequence.
2.3.2.3 Pulse sequence optimization.
2.4 Strength of the magnetic field.
2.5 Artifacts.
2.5.1 Aliasing (wraparound) artifact.
2.5.2 Fat
shift artifact.
2.5.3 Artifacts caused by patients' movement.
2.5.4 Metal artifacts.
2.6 Advantages of MRI over other imaging techniques.
2.7 Disadvantages of MRI compared with other imaging techniques.
2.8 Safety of MRI.
2.8.1 Short term effects.
2.8.1.1 Static magnetic field.
8.1.2 Effects of electrical currents induced by the main magnetic field varying in time.
2.8.1.3 Warming/heating effects of RF signals.
2.8.2 Long
term effects.
2.9 Contraindications for MRI investigation.
III. Technical Aspects of Mri Specificially Relevant to Patients with Urinary Bladder Carcinoma.
3.1 Introduction, optimal conditions for examination.
3.2 Patient
related factors.
3.2.1 Voluntary motion artifacts.
3.2.2 Involuntary motion artifacts.
3.2.3 Bladder distension.
3.3 Pulse sequence optimization.
3.3.1 Literature review.
3.3.2 Evaluation of sequences most frequently used in the literature.
3.3.2.1 T1
weighted sequences.
3.3.2.2 T2
weighted sequences.
3.3.2.3 Proton
weighted sequences.
3.3.3 Determination of the optimal pulse sequence (1.5 T).
3.3.3.1 T1 and T2 calculations to optimize the pulse sequence.
3.3.3.2 Pulse sequence optimization by means of 'contrast matrices'.
3.3.3.3 Pulse sequence optimization by means of 'synthetic imaging'.
3.3.4 Interim conclusion.
3.4 Body
coil MRI versus (double) surface
coil MRI.
3.4.1 Results at a field strength of 0.5 T.
3.4.1.1 Patients and methods.
3.4.1.2 Results.
3.4.1.3 Discussion.
3.4.2 Results at a field strength of 1.5 T.
3.4.2.1 Patients and methods.
3.4.2.2 Results.
3.4.2.3 Discussion.
3.4.3 Interim conclusion.
3.5 Comparison of staging results at 0.5 T and 1.5 T.
3.5.1 Introduction.
3.5.2 Patients, methods, and results.
3.5.3 Discussion.
3.6 Conclusion and protocol to be followed.
IV. Normal Mr Images: Correlation With Known Anatomic Proportions.
4.1 Normal MR images of the pelvis.
4.1.1 The male pelvis.
4.1.2 The female pelvis.
4.2 Correlation of MR images with anatomic sections.
4.3 Correlations of MR images with sections of resected specimens.
V. Staging of Carcinoma of the Urinary Bladder on the Basis of MRI Results.
5.1 Introduction.
5.1.1 Survey of groups of patient.
5.2 Evaluation of MRI, CT, and the clinical staging method compared with postoperative histopathologic staging based on cystectomy and autopsy specimens.
5.2.1 Patients and methods.
5.2.2 Results.
5.2.2.1 Patients.
5.2.2.2 MR images of resected specimens.
5.2.3 Discussion.
5.2.4 Interim conclusion.
5.3. Evaluation of staging with MRI and CT by using a combination of clinical staging and follow
up as a reference.
5.3.1 Patients and methods.
5.3.2 Results.
5.3.3 Discussion.
5.3.4 Interim conclusion.
5.4 Evaluation of staging with MRI by using a combination of clinical staging and follow
up as a reference.
5.4.1 Patients, methods, and results.
5.4.2 Discussion 101 5.4.3. Interim conclusion.
VI. Discussion, Conclusions and Future Perspectives.
6.1 Discussion and conclusions.
6.2 Future prospects.
6.2.1 Surface coils.
6.2.2 Contrast agents.
6.2.3 Fast sequences.
VII. Summary.
References.
1.1 Magnetic spin tomography.
1.2 Carcinoma of the urinary bladder.
1.2.1 General aspects.
1.2.2 Method of clinical staging.
1.3 Diagnostic imaging of carcinoma of the urinary bladder.
1.3.1 Intravenous urography.
1.3.2 Ultrasound.
1.3.3 Computed Tomography.
1.3.4 Lymphography.
1.3.5 Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
1.4 Aims and design of this study.
II. General Principles Of MRI.
2.1 Introduction.
2.2 Basic physics of MRI.
2.2.1 Nuclear spins, resonant frequency.
2.2.2 Spin imaging: proton density, T1 and T2 relaxation times.
2.3 Image contrast.
2.3.1 'Inherent' tissue contrast, image contrast.
2.3.2 Adjustable factors, pulse sequences.
2.3.2.1 Spin
echo pulse sequence.
2.3.2.2 Inversion recovery pulse sequence.
2.3.2.3 Pulse sequence optimization.
2.4 Strength of the magnetic field.
2.5 Artifacts.
2.5.1 Aliasing (wraparound) artifact.
2.5.2 Fat
shift artifact.
2.5.3 Artifacts caused by patients' movement.
2.5.4 Metal artifacts.
2.6 Advantages of MRI over other imaging techniques.
2.7 Disadvantages of MRI compared with other imaging techniques.
2.8 Safety of MRI.
2.8.1 Short term effects.
2.8.1.1 Static magnetic field.
8.1.2 Effects of electrical currents induced by the main magnetic field varying in time.
2.8.1.3 Warming/heating effects of RF signals.
2.8.2 Long
term effects.
2.9 Contraindications for MRI investigation.
III. Technical Aspects of Mri Specificially Relevant to Patients with Urinary Bladder Carcinoma.
3.1 Introduction, optimal conditions for examination.
3.2 Patient
related factors.
3.2.1 Voluntary motion artifacts.
3.2.2 Involuntary motion artifacts.
3.2.3 Bladder distension.
3.3 Pulse sequence optimization.
3.3.1 Literature review.
3.3.2 Evaluation of sequences most frequently used in the literature.
3.3.2.1 T1
weighted sequences.
3.3.2.2 T2
weighted sequences.
3.3.2.3 Proton
weighted sequences.
3.3.3 Determination of the optimal pulse sequence (1.5 T).
3.3.3.1 T1 and T2 calculations to optimize the pulse sequence.
3.3.3.2 Pulse sequence optimization by means of 'contrast matrices'.
3.3.3.3 Pulse sequence optimization by means of 'synthetic imaging'.
3.3.4 Interim conclusion.
3.4 Body
coil MRI versus (double) surface
coil MRI.
3.4.1 Results at a field strength of 0.5 T.
3.4.1.1 Patients and methods.
3.4.1.2 Results.
3.4.1.3 Discussion.
3.4.2 Results at a field strength of 1.5 T.
3.4.2.1 Patients and methods.
3.4.2.2 Results.
3.4.2.3 Discussion.
3.4.3 Interim conclusion.
3.5 Comparison of staging results at 0.5 T and 1.5 T.
3.5.1 Introduction.
3.5.2 Patients, methods, and results.
3.5.3 Discussion.
3.6 Conclusion and protocol to be followed.
IV. Normal Mr Images: Correlation With Known Anatomic Proportions.
4.1 Normal MR images of the pelvis.
4.1.1 The male pelvis.
4.1.2 The female pelvis.
4.2 Correlation of MR images with anatomic sections.
4.3 Correlations of MR images with sections of resected specimens.
V. Staging of Carcinoma of the Urinary Bladder on the Basis of MRI Results.
5.1 Introduction.
5.1.1 Survey of groups of patient.
5.2 Evaluation of MRI, CT, and the clinical staging method compared with postoperative histopathologic staging based on cystectomy and autopsy specimens.
5.2.1 Patients and methods.
5.2.2 Results.
5.2.2.1 Patients.
5.2.2.2 MR images of resected specimens.
5.2.3 Discussion.
5.2.4 Interim conclusion.
5.3. Evaluation of staging with MRI and CT by using a combination of clinical staging and follow
up as a reference.
5.3.1 Patients and methods.
5.3.2 Results.
5.3.3 Discussion.
5.3.4 Interim conclusion.
5.4 Evaluation of staging with MRI by using a combination of clinical staging and follow
up as a reference.
5.4.1 Patients, methods, and results.
5.4.2 Discussion 101 5.4.3. Interim conclusion.
VI. Discussion, Conclusions and Future Perspectives.
6.1 Discussion and conclusions.
6.2 Future prospects.
6.2.1 Surface coils.
6.2.2 Contrast agents.
6.2.3 Fast sequences.
VII. Summary.
References.