Alex Van Naerssen, Theo Sandfort

Male Intergenerational Intimacy

Historical, Socio-Psychological, and Legal Perspectives

• Gebundenes Buch

Produktbeschreibung

Looking at man-boy relationships, or paedophilia, this book attempts to provide an accurate, unbiased view of an emotive subject. The contributors examine case studies, discuss childhood sexuality and offer suggestions for counselling and psychotherapy.

---

Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.

Produktdetails

• Verlag: Taylor & Francis Inc
• Seitenzahl: 342
• Erscheinungstermin: 4. Februar 1991
• Englisch
• Abmessung: 223mm x 160mm x 30mm
• Gewicht: 552g
• ISBN-13: 9781560240006
• ISBN-10: 1560240008
• Artikelnr.: 22195769

Autorenporträt

Alex Van Naerssen, Theo Sandfort

Inhaltsangabe

Contents
Foreword: The Debate on Pedophilia
* Man-Boy Relationships: Different Concepts for a Diversity of
Phenomena
* Pederasty Among Primitives: Institutionalized Initiation and Cultic
Prostitution
* The Thera Inscriptions--Ritual or Slander?
* The Historic Origins Statues Concerning Sexual Activities Involving
Children and Adolescents
* Man-Boy Friendships on Trial: On the Shift in the Discourse on Boy
Love in the Early Twentieth Century
* Boys in Art. The Artist and His Model: Ferdinand and Hector Hodler. A
New Approach
* Ephebophilia and the Creation of a Spiritual Myth in the Works of
Ralph-Nicholas Chubb
* "The Main Thing Is Being Wanted": Some Case Studies on Adult Sexual
Experiences With Children
* Boy-Lovers and Their Influence on Boys: Distorted Research and
Anecdotal Observations
* Man-Boy Lovers: Assessment, Counseling, and Psychotherapy
* A Model for Group Counseling With Male Pedophiles
* Tolerance at Arm's Length: The Dutch Experience
* Understanding Childhood Sexualities
* Man/Boy Love and the American Gay Movement
* The Study of Intergenerational Intimacy in North America: Beyond
Politics and Pedophilia
* Objectivity and Ideology: Criticism of Theo Sandfort's Research on
Man-Boy Sexual Relations
* Response to Bauserman
* Response to the Bauserman Critique