Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Media Coverage of the Ukrainian 1932-1933 Famine-Genocide]( "Media Coverage of the Ukrainian 1932-1933 Famine-Genocide")
Media Coverage of the Ukrainian 1932-1933 Famine-Genocide32,99 €![Media coverage of the strategic partnership between Belarus and China]( "Media coverage of the strategic partnership between Belarus and China")
Media coverage of the strategic partnership between Belarus and China23,99 €![Challenges Citizen Journalism Sets Traditional Journalism]( "Challenges Citizen Journalism Sets Traditional Journalism")
Challenges Citizen Journalism Sets Traditional Journalism15,95 €![Media Coverage of Environmental Conservation Issues]( "Media Coverage of Environmental Conservation Issues")
Media Coverage of Environmental Conservation Issues27,95 €![Media coverage of human trafficking: approaches, controversies, solutions]( "Media coverage of human trafficking: approaches, controversies, solutions")
Media coverage of human trafficking: approaches, controversies, solutions25,99 €![The August War in Georgia: Foreign Media Coverage]( "The August War in Georgia: Foreign Media Coverage")
The August War in Georgia: Foreign Media Coverage48,00 €![Press Reform Debate: Coverage in the British Media]( "Press Reform Debate: Coverage in the British Media")
Press Reform Debate: Coverage in the British Media153,99 €
Africa talked to the BBC more frequently than those who appreciated what China is doing in Africa. As such, in the BBC online news narratives, criticisms of China- Africa relations were more pronounced. From this, one can conclude that the BBC, as the Western liberal media, seems to reflect the foreign policy direction of the Western governments in relation to Chinese investment in Africa. The BBC and ETV online news narratives presented China- Africa relations differently. This might be attributed to the fact that they are informed by two different models of journalism: ETV follows the development journalism model, whereas the BBC adheres to the liberal model.