Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Myriad Mirrors: Reflections on North-East Indian Literature in English]( "Myriad Mirrors: Reflections on North-East Indian Literature in English")
Myriad Mirrors: Reflections on North-East Indian Literature in English32,99 €![Gardens and Landscapes in English Literature]( "Gardens and Landscapes in English Literature")
Gardens and Landscapes in English Literature32,99 €![The English and the French Literary Tastes in the Middle Ages]( "The English and the French Literary Tastes in the Middle Ages")
The English and the French Literary Tastes in the Middle Ages32,99 €![Voice and Vision of Women Writers in Indian English Literature]( "Voice and Vision of Women Writers in Indian English Literature")
Voice and Vision of Women Writers in Indian English Literature44,99 €![Exploring Untouched Shades of North-East Indian Literature in English]( "Exploring Untouched Shades of North-East Indian Literature in English")
Exploring Untouched Shades of North-East Indian Literature in English51,99 €![Prime Detectives in English Literature]( "Prime Detectives in English Literature")
Prime Detectives in English Literature32,99 €![Die Fremdheit der Medea]( "Die Fremdheit der Medea")
Die Fremdheit der Medea49,00 €
If woman was already considered a baser being in
medieval English literary culture, then what explains
the monstrous women--part-animal, or
magically-empowered--who function as typical romance
heroines? If the monstrous women simply dramatize the
conventions of medieval misogyny, then why do so many
of them found dynasties, establish empires, and fill
the royal seats across Europe with their offspring?
A closer look at the figures of Constance, Medea, and
Melusine in 14th, 15th, and early 16th-century
English narratives reveals how metaphorical female
monstrosity functions as a critical lens that allows
authors, and audiences, to reflect on and re-examine
misogynistic conventions, patriarchal authority, and
the romance formula itself. Arguing that the Middle
English romance constructs new possibilities for
fiction, this study uses recent scholarship on
monster theory and medieval women to theorize the
presence of these monstrous women in medieval
romance, discovering how they trace the formulation
of a distinct gender ideology and expose the flaws of
a literary rhetoric that, in defining the female as
Other to the normative male, makes women into monsters.
medieval English literary culture, then what explains
the monstrous women--part-animal, or
magically-empowered--who function as typical romance
heroines? If the monstrous women simply dramatize the
conventions of medieval misogyny, then why do so many
of them found dynasties, establish empires, and fill
the royal seats across Europe with their offspring?
A closer look at the figures of Constance, Medea, and
Melusine in 14th, 15th, and early 16th-century
English narratives reveals how metaphorical female
monstrosity functions as a critical lens that allows
authors, and audiences, to reflect on and re-examine
misogynistic conventions, patriarchal authority, and
the romance formula itself. Arguing that the Middle
English romance constructs new possibilities for
fiction, this study uses recent scholarship on
monster theory and medieval women to theorize the
presence of these monstrous women in medieval
romance, discovering how they trace the formulation
of a distinct gender ideology and expose the flaws of
a literary rhetoric that, in defining the female as
Other to the normative male, makes women into monsters.