Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Cooperative learning as a teaching strategy for the classroom]( "Cooperative learning as a teaching strategy for the classroom")
Cooperative learning as a teaching strategy for the classroom51,99 €![Effects of Coaching on Self-regulated Learning Strategy Use and Grades]( "Effects of Coaching on Self-regulated Learning Strategy Use and Grades")
Effects of Coaching on Self-regulated Learning Strategy Use and Grades32,99 €![Increasing ELLs' Awareness and Use of Metacognitive Strategies]( "Increasing ELLs' Awareness and Use of Metacognitive Strategies")
Increasing ELLs' Awareness and Use of Metacognitive Strategies51,99 €![Social Coping Strategy Endorsement of Gifted Adolescents]( "Social Coping Strategy Endorsement of Gifted Adolescents")
Social Coping Strategy Endorsement of Gifted Adolescents32,99 €![The effectiveness of Semantic Mapping Strategy and DRTA Strategy in:]( "The effectiveness of Semantic Mapping Strategy and DRTA Strategy in:")
The effectiveness of Semantic Mapping Strategy and DRTA Strategy in:38,99 €![Teacher Written Feedback and Revision Strategy in EFL Writing Process]( "Teacher Written Feedback and Revision Strategy in EFL Writing Process")
Teacher Written Feedback and Revision Strategy in EFL Writing Process32,99 €![Metacognitive Instruction]( "Metacognitive Instruction")
Metacognitive Instruction38,99 €
This study identifies the relationship between
preferred MCLLSs and language-learning styles
(LLSYs) and their patterns of use amongst a selected
group of learners at a vocational education
institute in Hong Kong. The quantitative data reveal
a medium to high use of MCLLSs among learners and a
prevalence of multiple major preferences. The
qualitative data show the reasons for using and not
using particular MCLLSs, the reasons for preferring
and not preferring particular LLSYs, situations and
language tasks in which MCLLSs were selectively used
and in which particular LLSYs were favoured. Despite
the existence of the discrepancies between the
quantitative and qualitative data, the findings from
the two data sources were consistent in showing that
there were no differences in the MCLLS use of
learners with each of the six major style
preferences. The target groups for this book include
practitioners, students, teacher trainees,
researchers and policy makers in TESOL or related
field.
preferred MCLLSs and language-learning styles
(LLSYs) and their patterns of use amongst a selected
group of learners at a vocational education
institute in Hong Kong. The quantitative data reveal
a medium to high use of MCLLSs among learners and a
prevalence of multiple major preferences. The
qualitative data show the reasons for using and not
using particular MCLLSs, the reasons for preferring
and not preferring particular LLSYs, situations and
language tasks in which MCLLSs were selectively used
and in which particular LLSYs were favoured. Despite
the existence of the discrepancies between the
quantitative and qualitative data, the findings from
the two data sources were consistent in showing that
there were no differences in the MCLLS use of
learners with each of the six major style
preferences. The target groups for this book include
practitioners, students, teacher trainees,
researchers and policy makers in TESOL or related
field.