Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Creating a New Reality: Information Age Effects on the Deception Process]( "Creating a New Reality: Information Age Effects on the Deception Process")
Creating a New Reality: Information Age Effects on the Deception Process60,99 €![Appreciation for Vulnerability to Deception at the Operational Level]( "Appreciation for Vulnerability to Deception at the Operational Level")
Appreciation for Vulnerability to Deception at the Operational Level60,99 €![Deception and the Operational Level of War]( "Deception and the Operational Level of War")
Deception and the Operational Level of War60,99 €![Strategic Planning Process and the Need for Grand Strategy]( "Strategic Planning Process and the Need for Grand Strategy")
Strategic Planning Process and the Need for Grand Strategy60,99 €![Operational Deception Doctrine: Melding the Air, Ground, and Naval Effort]( "Operational Deception Doctrine: Melding the Air, Ground, and Naval Effort")
Operational Deception Doctrine: Melding the Air, Ground, and Naval Effort60,99 €![Personality and the Planning Process]( "Personality and the Planning Process")
Personality and the Planning Process60,99 €![Systemic Operational Design: Enhancing the Joint Operation Planning Process]( "Systemic Operational Design: Enhancing the Joint Operation Planning Process")
Systemic Operational Design: Enhancing the Joint Operation Planning Process61,99 €
This is a theoretical, historical, and doctrinal analysis of current deception planning procedures in accordance with FM 90-2, Battlefield Deception Operations. Initially, there is a discussion of military theorist's opinions as to the importance of surprise and deception at the operational level of war. Then there is an analysis of the historical use of surprise gained through deception efforts and the utility of METT-T as a deception planning tool at the operational level. The paper demonstrated the dialectic quality of METT-T as well as concluded that the use of METT-T from both a friendly and enemy perspective is an imperative in the development of an operational level deception plan. The paper also concluded that a doctrinal void does exist in the Preliminary Draft of FM 90-2 in regards to the deception planning process. This void is extremely significant in that a process that merely considered the deception operation from a friendly perspective would only fulfill half of the requirement for a comprehensive METT-T analysis.