Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Report on the Arctic Capabilities of the U.S. Armed Forces]( "Report on the Arctic Capabilities of the U.S. Armed Forces")
Report on the Arctic Capabilities of the U.S. Armed Forces46,99 €![Cambodia's China Strategy]( "Cambodia's China Strategy")
Cambodia's China Strategy62,99 €![Small States and Hegemonic Competition in Southeast Asia]( "Small States and Hegemonic Competition in Southeast Asia")
Small States and Hegemonic Competition in Southeast Asia69,99 €![Excursions in and about Newfoundland, During the Years 1839 and 1840 2 Volume Set]( "Excursions in and about Newfoundland, During the Years 1839 and 1840 2 Volume Set")
Excursions in and about Newfoundland, During the Years 1839 and 1840 2 Volume Set105,99 €![Canadian Countercultures and the Environment]( "Canadian Countercultures and the Environment")
Canadian Countercultures and the Environment40,99 €![Peopling the North American City]( "Peopling the North American City")
Peopling the North American City47,99 €![Methods in Human Geography]( "Methods in Human Geography")
Methods in Human Geography82,99 €
In this report, the authors explore the equities of four middle powers--Australia, Canada, Japan, and the United Kingdom--and the roles that they might play in deterring or limiting conflict between China and Taiwan over the Taiwan Strait. A country's equities are its long-term interests in a scenario, such as a cross-Strait conflict. Middle powers are nations that are not small but lack the sheer size and influence to significantly disrupt the global order. However, middle-power countries can influence international affairs through mediation and institution-building, and middle powers can also play a balancing role between adversarial great powers. The authors use four countries--Australia, Canada, Japan, and the United Kingdom--to conduct a case-study analysis on how middle powers perceive China's interests and their own nations' interests in a cross-Strait conflict. The authors held discussions with analysts and policymakers from each middle-power nation on such topics as whether these nations would support Taiwan in a cross-Strait conflict, the threats that China might perceive from these nations, and whether the respondents think that China would initiate a conflict with Taiwan. The authors supplemented these discussions with an open-source literature review on how middle powers have been defined historically to support their analysis of each middle power's equities in a potential cross-Strait conflict. Finally, the authors offer several recommendations for future middle-power strategies that might be useful to policymakers in Taiwan, the United States, and middle powers with a stake in the Asia-Pacific region.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.