Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Combined Arms Warfare in the 21st Century: Maximizing the Capability of U.S. Army Future Combat System Equipped Brigade Combat Teams to Conduct Combin]( "Combined Arms Warfare in the 21st Century: Maximizing the Capability of U.S. Army Future Combat System Equipped Brigade Combat Teams to Conduct Combin")
Combined Arms Warfare in the 21st Century: Maximizing the Capability of U.S. Army Future Combat System Equipped Brigade Combat Teams to Conduct Combin63,99 €![The European Convention on Human Rights: A Threat to United States-European Security Relations and the United States Military Justice System]( "The European Convention on Human Rights: A Threat to United States-European Security Relations and the United States Military Justice System")
The European Convention on Human Rights: A Threat to United States-European Security Relations and the United States Military Justice System63,99 €![Is the U.S. Navy Prepared to Conduct Peace Operations in Support of the National Security Strategy?]( "Is the U.S. Navy Prepared to Conduct Peace Operations in Support of the National Security Strategy?")
Is the U.S. Navy Prepared to Conduct Peace Operations in Support of the National Security Strategy?63,99 €![Information Operations Doctrine: An Impediment to the Conduct of Information Operations at the Operational Level?]( "Information Operations Doctrine: An Impediment to the Conduct of Information Operations at the Operational Level?")
Information Operations Doctrine: An Impediment to the Conduct of Information Operations at the Operational Level?63,99 €![How Did a Lack of Strategic and Operational Vision Impair the Army's Ability to Conduct Tactical Operations in Korea in the Summer of 1950?]( "How Did a Lack of Strategic and Operational Vision Impair the Army's Ability to Conduct Tactical Operations in Korea in the Summer of 1950?")
How Did a Lack of Strategic and Operational Vision Impair the Army's Ability to Conduct Tactical Operations in Korea in the Summer of 1950?63,99 €![Can North Korean Special Purpose Forces Successfully Conduct Military Operations Against the United States and South Korea?]( "Can North Korean Special Purpose Forces Successfully Conduct Military Operations Against the United States and South Korea?")
Can North Korean Special Purpose Forces Successfully Conduct Military Operations Against the United States and South Korea?63,99 €![Enhancing the Jamaica Defence Force Military Intelligence Unit's Effectiveness to Conduct Counterdrug Missions]( "Enhancing the Jamaica Defence Force Military Intelligence Unit's Effectiveness to Conduct Counterdrug Missions")
Enhancing the Jamaica Defence Force Military Intelligence Unit's Effectiveness to Conduct Counterdrug Missions63,99 €
This study compares the system of military justice that existed during World War II with the present system. As a basis for comparison a framework is established which looks at three different aspects of the military justice system. The first examines the main characteristics of the military justice system. The second looks at the 'due process' rights of a military offender. The third and last addresses the organization and capabilities of past and present Staff Judge Advocate Sections at division level and below. The overarching context in which this comparison is made is the tempo of operations and the combat environment as it existed during the European Campaign, and under the conditions for future mid-to-high intensity conflict as outlined in the Army's warfighting doctrine, FM 100-5, Operations. AirLand Battle Doctrine envisions the future mid-to-high intensity battlefield as chaotic, intense, and highly destructive. To successfully support commanders in their efforts to maintain law, order and discipline, the requirements for the administration of the military justice system must be flexible enough to meet the challenges resulting from the tempo of operations and the combat environment. The system should also be able to function without undermining the 'due process' rights of soldiers. Research reveals that the 'due process' rights of the soldier have been significantly enhanced since World War II. The addition of these rights has added to the complexity of the administration of the military justice system. There is no evidence that the anticipated tempo of future operations and combat environment were taken into consideration when changes occurred to the military justice system. This study concludes that the current system of military justice will not affect commander's ability to conduct operations but, combat operations could affect significantly the administration of the military justice system.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.