Despite significant disparities in accuracy, both excellent and bad reasoners expressed identical levels of confidence. The researchers discovered that enhancing the skills of participants made them more precise. It is still feasible that sufficient experience and training will result in realistic intuitions regarding the quality of one's deductions. Even if many components of the self-esteem movement were misguided, its positive aspects and accomplishments should be acknowledged and embraced. They argue that psychology can be heard in public policy and debate and may still make a significant contribution to society's well-being.