Mitigation and Aggravation at Sentencing
Herausgeber: Roberts, Julian V.
Mitigation and Aggravation at Sentencing
Herausgeber: Roberts, Julian V.
- Gebundenes Buch
- Merkliste
- Auf die Merkliste
- Bewerten Bewerten
- Teilen
- Produkt teilen
- Produkterinnerung
- Produkterinnerung
This volume explores an important, yet under-researched, area of sentencing law and practice: the use of mitigating and aggravating factors.
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
- Mitigation and Aggravation at Sentencing47,99 €
- Andrew AshworthSentencing and Criminal Justice61,99 €
- Andrew AshworthSentencing and Criminal Justice134,99 €
- Michael C. BraswellJustice, Crime, and Ethics266,99 €
- James ThorntonEssential Criminal Law and Criminal Practice for SQE1233,99 €
- Martin WasikA Practical Approach to Sentencing112,99 €
- Australian Courts103,99 €
-
-
-
This volume explores an important, yet under-researched, area of sentencing law and practice: the use of mitigating and aggravating factors.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Produktdetails
- Produktdetails
- Verlag: Cambridge University Press
- Seitenzahl: 304
- Erscheinungstermin: 25. August 2011
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 235mm x 157mm x 21mm
- Gewicht: 594g
- ISBN-13: 9780521197809
- ISBN-10: 0521197805
- Artikelnr.: 33353344
- Verlag: Cambridge University Press
- Seitenzahl: 304
- Erscheinungstermin: 25. August 2011
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 235mm x 157mm x 21mm
- Gewicht: 594g
- ISBN-13: 9780521197809
- ISBN-10: 0521197805
- Artikelnr.: 33353344
1. Exploring aggravation and mitigation at sentencing Julian Roberts; 2.
Re-evaluating the justifications for aggravation and mitigation at
sentencing Andrew Ashworth; 3. The search for principles of mitigation:
integrating cultural demands Allan Manson; 4. Personal mitigation at
sentencing and assumptions about offending and desistance Joanna Shapland;
5. Intoxication as a sentencing factor: mitigating or aggravating? Nicola
Padfield; 6. Beyond the partial excuse: Australasian approaches to
provocation as a sentencing factor Arie Freiberg and Felicity Stewart; 7.
Equality before the law: racial and social background factors as sources of
mitigation at sentencing Kate Warner; 8. Personal mitigation: an empirical
analysis in England and Wales Jessica Jacobson and Mike Hough; 9. Exploring
public attitudes to sentencing factors in England and Wales Julian Roberts
and Mike Hough; 10. The pernicious impact of perceived public opinion on
sentencing: findings from an empirical study of the public's approach to
personal mitigation Austin Lovegrove; 11. Addressing problematic sentencing
factors in the development of guidelines Warren Young and Andrea King; 12.
Proof of aggravating and mitigating facts at sentencing Kevin Reitz; 13.
Mitigation in federal sentencing in the United States Will Berry; 14. The
discretionary effect of mitigating and aggravating factors: a South African
case study Stephan Terblanche.
Re-evaluating the justifications for aggravation and mitigation at
sentencing Andrew Ashworth; 3. The search for principles of mitigation:
integrating cultural demands Allan Manson; 4. Personal mitigation at
sentencing and assumptions about offending and desistance Joanna Shapland;
5. Intoxication as a sentencing factor: mitigating or aggravating? Nicola
Padfield; 6. Beyond the partial excuse: Australasian approaches to
provocation as a sentencing factor Arie Freiberg and Felicity Stewart; 7.
Equality before the law: racial and social background factors as sources of
mitigation at sentencing Kate Warner; 8. Personal mitigation: an empirical
analysis in England and Wales Jessica Jacobson and Mike Hough; 9. Exploring
public attitudes to sentencing factors in England and Wales Julian Roberts
and Mike Hough; 10. The pernicious impact of perceived public opinion on
sentencing: findings from an empirical study of the public's approach to
personal mitigation Austin Lovegrove; 11. Addressing problematic sentencing
factors in the development of guidelines Warren Young and Andrea King; 12.
Proof of aggravating and mitigating facts at sentencing Kevin Reitz; 13.
Mitigation in federal sentencing in the United States Will Berry; 14. The
discretionary effect of mitigating and aggravating factors: a South African
case study Stephan Terblanche.
1. Exploring aggravation and mitigation at sentencing Julian Roberts; 2.
Re-evaluating the justifications for aggravation and mitigation at
sentencing Andrew Ashworth; 3. The search for principles of mitigation:
integrating cultural demands Allan Manson; 4. Personal mitigation at
sentencing and assumptions about offending and desistance Joanna Shapland;
5. Intoxication as a sentencing factor: mitigating or aggravating? Nicola
Padfield; 6. Beyond the partial excuse: Australasian approaches to
provocation as a sentencing factor Arie Freiberg and Felicity Stewart; 7.
Equality before the law: racial and social background factors as sources of
mitigation at sentencing Kate Warner; 8. Personal mitigation: an empirical
analysis in England and Wales Jessica Jacobson and Mike Hough; 9. Exploring
public attitudes to sentencing factors in England and Wales Julian Roberts
and Mike Hough; 10. The pernicious impact of perceived public opinion on
sentencing: findings from an empirical study of the public's approach to
personal mitigation Austin Lovegrove; 11. Addressing problematic sentencing
factors in the development of guidelines Warren Young and Andrea King; 12.
Proof of aggravating and mitigating facts at sentencing Kevin Reitz; 13.
Mitigation in federal sentencing in the United States Will Berry; 14. The
discretionary effect of mitigating and aggravating factors: a South African
case study Stephan Terblanche.
Re-evaluating the justifications for aggravation and mitigation at
sentencing Andrew Ashworth; 3. The search for principles of mitigation:
integrating cultural demands Allan Manson; 4. Personal mitigation at
sentencing and assumptions about offending and desistance Joanna Shapland;
5. Intoxication as a sentencing factor: mitigating or aggravating? Nicola
Padfield; 6. Beyond the partial excuse: Australasian approaches to
provocation as a sentencing factor Arie Freiberg and Felicity Stewart; 7.
Equality before the law: racial and social background factors as sources of
mitigation at sentencing Kate Warner; 8. Personal mitigation: an empirical
analysis in England and Wales Jessica Jacobson and Mike Hough; 9. Exploring
public attitudes to sentencing factors in England and Wales Julian Roberts
and Mike Hough; 10. The pernicious impact of perceived public opinion on
sentencing: findings from an empirical study of the public's approach to
personal mitigation Austin Lovegrove; 11. Addressing problematic sentencing
factors in the development of guidelines Warren Young and Andrea King; 12.
Proof of aggravating and mitigating facts at sentencing Kevin Reitz; 13.
Mitigation in federal sentencing in the United States Will Berry; 14. The
discretionary effect of mitigating and aggravating factors: a South African
case study Stephan Terblanche.