Mitigation and Aggravation at Sentencing
Herausgeber: Roberts, Julian V.
1. Exploring aggravation and mitigation at sentencing Julian Roberts; 2.
Re-evaluating the justifications for aggravation and mitigation at
sentencing Andrew Ashworth; 3. The search for principles of mitigation:
integrating cultural demands Allan Manson; 4. Personal mitigation at
sentencing and assumptions about offending and desistance Joanna Shapland;
5. Intoxication as a sentencing factor: mitigating or aggravating? Nicola
Padfield; 6. Beyond the partial excuse: Australasian approaches to
provocation as a sentencing factor Arie Freiberg and Felicity Stewart; 7.
Equality before the law: racial and social background factors as sources of
mitigation at sentencing Kate Warner; 8. Personal mitigation: an empirical
analysis in England and Wales Jessica Jacobson and Mike Hough; 9. Exploring
public attitudes to sentencing factors in England and Wales Julian Roberts
and Mike Hough; 10. The pernicious impact of perceived public opinion on
sentencing: findings from an empirical study of the public's approach to
personal mitigation Austin Lovegrove; 11. Addressing problematic sentencing
factors in the development of guidelines Warren Young and Andrea King; 12.
Proof of aggravating and mitigating facts at sentencing Kevin Reitz; 13.
Mitigation in federal sentencing in the United States Will Berry; 14. The
discretionary effect of mitigating and aggravating factors: a South African
case study Stephan Terblanche.
