Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Evaluating and Standardizing Therapeutic Agents, 1890-1950]( "Evaluating and Standardizing Therapeutic Agents, 1890-1950")
Evaluating and Standardizing Therapeutic Agents, 1890-195037,99 €![Democratic Governance in Northeast Asia: A Human-Centered Approach to Evaluating Democracy]( "Democratic Governance in Northeast Asia: A Human-Centered Approach to Evaluating Democracy")
Democratic Governance in Northeast Asia: A Human-Centered Approach to Evaluating Democracy37,99 €![Sorting It Out: Evaluating Data]( "Sorting It Out: Evaluating Data")
Sorting It Out: Evaluating Data28,99 €![Evaluating Catholyte]( "Evaluating Catholyte")
Evaluating Catholyte30,99 €![Evaluating Progress in International Relations]( "Evaluating Progress in International Relations")
Evaluating Progress in International Relations219,99 €![Evaluating Transitional Justice]( "Evaluating Transitional Justice")
Evaluating Transitional Justice81,99 €![Evaluating protected area network of Nepal by using GIS]( "Evaluating protected area network of Nepal by using GIS")
Evaluating protected area network of Nepal by using GIS32,99 €
Due to its very nature, the evaluation of research permeates nearly every aspect of the work of researchers. They evaluate the work of others or have their own work evaluated. They evaluate hypotheses that come to mind, the previous literature, the quality of data, the explanatory power of theories, or the design of experiments or instruments. However, deciding when someone is or has become a first-rate or world-class researcher is an evaluation at a somewhat different level. It is a complex synthesis of judgments about how well the researcher does each of the constitutive types of evaluation, usually as evidenced in the work they are producing.
In the last few decades the evaluation of research has become a high-stakes enterprise. With increasing political governance and federal budgets often in the billions, the livelihood of individual researchers, research groups, departments, programs, and entire institutions often swing in the balance. In this book, the author systematically analyzes and compares the quality of the models used to fund and evaluate scientific research in sixteen countries.
In the last few decades the evaluation of research has become a high-stakes enterprise. With increasing political governance and federal budgets often in the billions, the livelihood of individual researchers, research groups, departments, programs, and entire institutions often swing in the balance. In this book, the author systematically analyzes and compares the quality of the models used to fund and evaluate scientific research in sixteen countries.