Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Work in the Future]( "Work in the Future")
Work in the Future21,99 €![The Three Regularities in Development]( "The Three Regularities in Development")
The Three Regularities in Development81,99 €![South Asian Migration in the Gulf]( "South Asian Migration in the Gulf")
South Asian Migration in the Gulf110,99 €![The Three Regularities in Development]( "The Three Regularities in Development")
The Three Regularities in Development110,99 €![About Card's, Cardoso's and Kline's]( "About Card's, Cardoso's and Kline's")
About Card's, Cardoso's and Kline's "Bargaining, Sorting, and the Gender Wage Gap: Quantifying the Impact of Firms on the Relative Pay of Women"18,95 €![The Marriage Motive: A Price Theory of Marriage]( "The Marriage Motive: A Price Theory of Marriage")
The Marriage Motive: A Price Theory of Marriage37,99 €![Principles of Economics]( "Principles of Economics")
Principles of Economics38,99 €
- Introduction.
- Part I:
Spatial Monopsony:
Simple Static Monopsony
Short-Run Spatial Monopsony
Long-Run Spatial Monopsony
Spatial Monopsony and the Gender Pay Gap
Spatial Monopsony and Regional Differences in the Gender Pay Gap
- Part II:
Dynamic Monopsony:
Simple Dynamic Monopsony
A General Equilibrium Model of Dynamic Monopsony
Dynamic Monopsony and the Gender Pay Gap
Concluding Remarks
This book investigates models of spatial and dynamic monopsony and their application to the persistent empirical regularity of the gender pay gap. Theoretically, the main conclusion is that employers possess more monopsony power over their female employees if women are less driven by pecuniary considerations in their choice of employers than men. Employers may exploit this to increase their profits at the detriment of women's wages. Empirically, it is indeed found that women's labour supply to the firm is less wage-elastic than men's and that at least a third of the gender pay gap in the data investigated may result from employers engaging in monopsonistic discrimination. Therefore, a monopsonistic approach to gender discrimination in the labour market clearly contributes to the economic understanding of the gender pay gap. It not only provides an intuitively appealing explanation of the gap from standard economic reasoning, but it is also corroborated by empirical observation.
- Part I:
Spatial Monopsony:
Simple Static Monopsony
Short-Run Spatial Monopsony
Long-Run Spatial Monopsony
Spatial Monopsony and the Gender Pay Gap
Spatial Monopsony and Regional Differences in the Gender Pay Gap
- Part II:
Dynamic Monopsony:
Simple Dynamic Monopsony
A General Equilibrium Model of Dynamic Monopsony
Dynamic Monopsony and the Gender Pay Gap
Concluding Remarks
This book investigates models of spatial and dynamic monopsony and their application to the persistent empirical regularity of the gender pay gap. Theoretically, the main conclusion is that employers possess more monopsony power over their female employees if women are less driven by pecuniary considerations in their choice of employers than men. Employers may exploit this to increase their profits at the detriment of women's wages. Empirically, it is indeed found that women's labour supply to the firm is less wage-elastic than men's and that at least a third of the gender pay gap in the data investigated may result from employers engaging in monopsonistic discrimination. Therefore, a monopsonistic approach to gender discrimination in the labour market clearly contributes to the economic understanding of the gender pay gap. It not only provides an intuitively appealing explanation of the gap from standard economic reasoning, but it is also corroborated by empirical observation.