A groundbreaking contribution to a central debate in environmentalismHinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Ben A. Minteer is Assistant Professor of Environmental Ethics and Policy in the School of Life Sciences and affiliated Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Arizona State University. He is author of The Landscape of Reform: Civic Pragmatism and Environmental Thought in America.
Inhaltsangabe
Acknowledgments PART I Introduction 1. Unity among Environmentalists? Debating the Values-Policy Link in Environmental Ethics PART II The Convergence Hypothesis Debate in Environmental Ethics: The First Wave 2. Contextualism and Norton’s Convergence Hypothesis 3. Convergence and Contextualism: Some Clarifications and a Reply to Steverson 4. Why Norton’s Approach Is Insufficient for Environmental Ethics 5. Convergence in Environmental Values: An Empirical and Conceptual Defense 6. The Relevance of Environmental Ethical Theories for Policy Making PART III Expanding the Discussion: The Convergence Hypothesis Debate Today
7. Converging versus Reconstituting Environmental Ethics 8. Environmental Ethics and Future Generations 9. The Convergence Hypothesis Falsified: Implicit Intrinsic Value, Operational Rights, and De Facto Standing in the Endangered Species Act 10. Convergence in an Agrarian Key 11. Convergence and Ecological Restoration: A Counterexample 12. Does a Public Environmental Philosophy Need a Convergence Hypothesis? 13. The Importance of Creating an Applied Environmental Ethics: Lessons Learned from Climate Change 14. Who Is Converging with Whom? An Open Letter to Professor Bryan Norton from a Policy Wonk PART IV Reply by Bryan G. Norton 15. Convergence and Divergence: The Convergence Hypothesis Twenty Years Later Contributors Notes Index
Acknowledgments PART I Introduction 1. Unity among Environmentalists? Debating the Values-Policy Link in Environmental Ethics PART II The Convergence Hypothesis Debate in Environmental Ethics: The First Wave 2. Contextualism and Norton’s Convergence Hypothesis 3. Convergence and Contextualism: Some Clarifications and a Reply to Steverson 4. Why Norton’s Approach Is Insufficient for Environmental Ethics 5. Convergence in Environmental Values: An Empirical and Conceptual Defense 6. The Relevance of Environmental Ethical Theories for Policy Making PART III Expanding the Discussion: The Convergence Hypothesis Debate Today
7. Converging versus Reconstituting Environmental Ethics 8. Environmental Ethics and Future Generations 9. The Convergence Hypothesis Falsified: Implicit Intrinsic Value, Operational Rights, and De Facto Standing in the Endangered Species Act 10. Convergence in an Agrarian Key 11. Convergence and Ecological Restoration: A Counterexample 12. Does a Public Environmental Philosophy Need a Convergence Hypothesis? 13. The Importance of Creating an Applied Environmental Ethics: Lessons Learned from Climate Change 14. Who Is Converging with Whom? An Open Letter to Professor Bryan Norton from a Policy Wonk PART IV Reply by Bryan G. Norton 15. Convergence and Divergence: The Convergence Hypothesis Twenty Years Later Contributors Notes Index
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Shop der buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG i.I. Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg Amtsgericht Augsburg HRA 13309
