"This book considers the seminal debate in jurisprudence between Ronald Dworkin and Stanley Fish. It looks at the exchange between Dworkin and Fish, initiated in the 1980s, and analyses the role the exchange has played in the development of contemporary theories of interpretation, legal reasoning, and the nature of law. The book encompasses 4 key themes of the debate between these authors: legal theory and its critical role, interpretation and critical constraints, pragmatism and interpretive communities, and some general implications of the debate for issues like the nature of legal theory…mehr
"This book considers the seminal debate in jurisprudence between Ronald Dworkin and Stanley Fish. It looks at the exchange between Dworkin and Fish, initiated in the 1980s, and analyses the role the exchange has played in the development of contemporary theories of interpretation, legal reasoning, and the nature of law. The book encompasses 4 key themes of the debate between these authors: legal theory and its critical role, interpretation and critical constraints, pragmatism and interpretive communities, and some general implications of the debate for issues like the nature of legal theory and the possibility of objectivity. The collection brings together prominent legal theorists and one of the protagonists of the debate: Professor Stanley Fish, who concludes the collection with an interview in which he discusses the main topics discussed in the collection"--
Thomas Bustamante is Professor of Legal Theory and Philosophy of Law at the Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Margaret Martin is Associate Professor at the Faculty of Law at Western University, Canada.
Inhaltsangabe
Introduction - Thomas Bustamante (Federal University of Minas Gerais Brazil) and Margaret Martin (Western University Canada) Part One: Legal Theory and Its Critical Role 1. Reasoning Within and About (Legal) Practices Brian H Bix (University of Minnesota USA) 2. Fish Versus Dworkin: Sound and Fury But.? Larry Alexander (University of San Diego USA) 3. Explaining Us to Ourselves Jeremy Waldron (New York University USA) 4. Law Reason and Celestial Music N.E. Simmonds (University of Cambridge UK) 5. The Game Goes On: Why Legal Theorists Can Never Admit that Stanley Fish is Right David Kenny (Trinity College Dublin Ireland) Part Two. Interpretation and Critical Constraints 6. Reenchanting Practice: Stanley Fish and the Challenge of Virtue Ethics Maria Cahill (University College Cork Ireland) and Patrick O'Callaghan (University College Cork Ireland) 7. The Law in Quest of Integrity: Interpretation Invention and Internal Critique T. R. S. Allan (University of Cambridge UK) 8. The Relevance of Literary Interpretation Barbara Baum Levenbook (North Carolina State University USA) 9. Clash of the Titans: Hercules vs. Dennis Martinez (Reflections on the Fish-Dworkin Debate) Charles L. Barzun (University of Virginia USA) 10. Social Moral or Ameliorative? Understanding Constraints on Legal Interpretation Natalie Stoljar (McGill University Canada) Part Three: Pragmatism and Interpretive Communities 11. Revisiting the 'Fish-Dworkin Debate' Dennis Patterson (Rutgers University USA) 12. Almost Naturalism: The Jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin Dan Priel (York University Canada) 13. Interpreting Community: Agency Coercion and the Structure of Legal Practice Nicole Roughan (University of Auckland New Zealand) and Jesse Wall (University of Auckland New Zealand) 14. Fish versus Dworkin: A Comparison between Two Versions of Legal Pragmatism Thomas Bustamante (Federal University of Minas Gerais Brazil) 15. Making it Objective. Dworkin Inferentialism and the CLS Critique Thiago Lopes Decat (Federal University of Minas Gerais Brazil) Part Four: Implications 16. Dworkin Fish and Radically Defective Constitutions Sanford Levinson (University of Texas Law School USA) 17. The Problem of Immoral Integrity Lars Vinx (University of Cambridge UK) 18. What Makes Law? Dworkin Fish and Koskenniemi on the Rule of Law David Lefkowitz (University of Richmond UK) 19. Is Hercules a Natural? Rethinking the Fish/Dworkin Debate Margaret Martin (Western University Canada) 20. Interview with Professor Stanley Fish Thomas Bustamante (Federal University of Minas Gerais Brazil) and Margaret Martin (Western University Canada)
Introduction - Thomas Bustamante (Federal University of Minas Gerais Brazil) and Margaret Martin (Western University Canada) Part One: Legal Theory and Its Critical Role 1. Reasoning Within and About (Legal) Practices Brian H Bix (University of Minnesota USA) 2. Fish Versus Dworkin: Sound and Fury But.? Larry Alexander (University of San Diego USA) 3. Explaining Us to Ourselves Jeremy Waldron (New York University USA) 4. Law Reason and Celestial Music N.E. Simmonds (University of Cambridge UK) 5. The Game Goes On: Why Legal Theorists Can Never Admit that Stanley Fish is Right David Kenny (Trinity College Dublin Ireland) Part Two. Interpretation and Critical Constraints 6. Reenchanting Practice: Stanley Fish and the Challenge of Virtue Ethics Maria Cahill (University College Cork Ireland) and Patrick O'Callaghan (University College Cork Ireland) 7. The Law in Quest of Integrity: Interpretation Invention and Internal Critique T. R. S. Allan (University of Cambridge UK) 8. The Relevance of Literary Interpretation Barbara Baum Levenbook (North Carolina State University USA) 9. Clash of the Titans: Hercules vs. Dennis Martinez (Reflections on the Fish-Dworkin Debate) Charles L. Barzun (University of Virginia USA) 10. Social Moral or Ameliorative? Understanding Constraints on Legal Interpretation Natalie Stoljar (McGill University Canada) Part Three: Pragmatism and Interpretive Communities 11. Revisiting the 'Fish-Dworkin Debate' Dennis Patterson (Rutgers University USA) 12. Almost Naturalism: The Jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin Dan Priel (York University Canada) 13. Interpreting Community: Agency Coercion and the Structure of Legal Practice Nicole Roughan (University of Auckland New Zealand) and Jesse Wall (University of Auckland New Zealand) 14. Fish versus Dworkin: A Comparison between Two Versions of Legal Pragmatism Thomas Bustamante (Federal University of Minas Gerais Brazil) 15. Making it Objective. Dworkin Inferentialism and the CLS Critique Thiago Lopes Decat (Federal University of Minas Gerais Brazil) Part Four: Implications 16. Dworkin Fish and Radically Defective Constitutions Sanford Levinson (University of Texas Law School USA) 17. The Problem of Immoral Integrity Lars Vinx (University of Cambridge UK) 18. What Makes Law? Dworkin Fish and Koskenniemi on the Rule of Law David Lefkowitz (University of Richmond UK) 19. Is Hercules a Natural? Rethinking the Fish/Dworkin Debate Margaret Martin (Western University Canada) 20. Interview with Professor Stanley Fish Thomas Bustamante (Federal University of Minas Gerais Brazil) and Margaret Martin (Western University Canada)
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Shop der buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg Amtsgericht Augsburg HRA 13309
![Ontario Game and Fishing Laws [microform]: a Digest of the Whole Law, Provincial and Dominion, Affecting Birds, Animals and Fish in Ontario, Alphabeti](https://bilder.buecher.de/produkte/65/65588/65588583m.jpg "Ontario Game and Fishing Laws [microform]: a Digest of the Whole Law, Provincial and Dominion, Affecting Birds, Animals and Fish in Ontario, Alphabeti")
![Ontario Game and Fishing Laws [microform]: a Digest of the Whole Law, Provincial and Dominion, Affecting the Birds, Animals and Fish of Ontario, Alpha](https://bilder.buecher.de/produkte/65/65504/65504780m.jpg "Ontario Game and Fishing Laws [microform]: a Digest of the Whole Law, Provincial and Dominion, Affecting the Birds, Animals and Fish of Ontario, Alpha")
![The Law Illusion: Analytic Essays for the Working Public on the Fraud Called "e;Common Law"e; Decisions](https://bilder.buecher.de/produkte/60/60980/60980332m.jpg "The Law Illusion: Analytic Essays for the Working Public on the Fraud Called "e;Common Law"e; Decisions")
