Jordy Rocheleau

New Interventionist Just War Theory

A Critique

• Gebundenes Buch

Produktbeschreibung

This book offers a systematic critique of recent interventionist just war theories, which have made the recourse to force easier to justify. The work argues that these theories, including neo-traditionalist prerogatives to national leaders and a cosmopolitan human rights paradigm, offer criteria for war that are insufficient in principle and dangerous in practice. Drawing on a plurality of moral considerations, the book recommends a modified legalist national defense paradigm, which includes an atrocity threshold for humanitarian intervention and a legitimate authorization requirement. The plausibility of this restrictive framework is applied to case studies, including the long wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, ongoing targeted killing, and possible interventions in Syria and elsewhere. Various arguments which seek to loosen the criteria for war are also systematically analyzed and criticized. This book will be of much interest to students of just war theory, military history, ethics, political philosophy, and international relations.

---

Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.

Produktdetails

• Verlag: Routledge
• Seitenzahl: 254
• Erscheinungstermin: 23. November 2021
• Englisch
• Abmessung: 240mm x 161mm x 18mm
• Gewicht: 549g
• ISBN-13: 9780367615284
• ISBN-10: 0367615282
• Artikelnr.: 62799979

Autorenporträt

Jordy Rocheleau is Professor of Philosophy at Austin Peay State University, USA. He is co-author of Rights and Wrongs in the College Classroom (2007).

Inhaltsangabe

Introduction Part I: Ethical constraints on recourse to war: jus ad bellum
vs realism and neo-traditionalism 1. Just war theory and the ethical
restraint of war 2. Presumptions, principles, and prerogatives in war:
against hawkish neo-traditionalism 3. Why punishment is not a just cause
for war Part II: Defense of a just cause threshold 4. Against the new
cosmopolitan interventionism: why human rights protection is not sufficient
cause for war 5. What is it good for? Consequences and the limits of war 6.
Why two wrongs cannot make a right use of force: A critique of compound
just causes Part III: Just war procedures and application 7. Jus ad
(continuandum) bellum: reevaluating the justice of interventions over time
8. The nature and necessity of legitimate authorization 9. Conclusion:
applying non-interventionist jus ad bellum

---

Introduction Part I: Ethical constraints on recourse to war: jus ad bellum vs realism and neo-traditionalism 1. Just war theory and the ethical restraint of war 2. Presumptions, principles, and prerogatives in war: against hawkish neo-traditionalism 3. Why punishment is not a just cause for war Part II: Defense of a just cause threshold 4. Against the new cosmopolitan interventionism: why human rights protection is not sufficient cause for war 5. What is it good for? Consequences and the limits of war 6. Why two wrongs cannot make a right use of force: A critique of compound just causes Part III: Just war procedures and application 7. Jus ad (continuandum) bellum: reevaluating the justice of interventions over time 8. The nature and necessity of legitimate authorization 9. Conclusion: applying non-interventionist jus ad bellum