This book offers a systematic critique of recent interventionist just war theories, which have made the recourse to force easier to justify.Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Jordy Rocheleau is Professor of Philosophy at Austin Peay State University, USA. He is co-author of Rights and Wrongs in the College Classroom (2007).
Inhaltsangabe
Introduction Part I: Ethical constraints on recourse to war: jus ad bellum vs realism and neo-traditionalism 1. Just war theory and the ethical restraint of war 2. Presumptions, principles, and prerogatives in war: against hawkish neo-traditionalism 3. Why punishment is not a just cause for war Part II: Defense of a just cause threshold 4. Against the new cosmopolitan interventionism: why human rights protection is not sufficient cause for war 5. What is it good for? Consequences and the limits of war 6. Why two wrongs cannot make a right use of force: A critique of compound just causes Part III: Just war procedures and application 7. Jus ad (continuandum) bellum: reevaluating the justice of interventions over time 8. The nature and necessity of legitimate authorization 9. Conclusion: applying non-interventionist jus ad bellum
Introduction Part I: Ethical constraints on recourse to war: jus ad bellum vs realism and neo-traditionalism 1. Just war theory and the ethical restraint of war 2. Presumptions, principles, and prerogatives in war: against hawkish neo-traditionalism 3. Why punishment is not a just cause for war Part II: Defense of a just cause threshold 4. Against the new cosmopolitan interventionism: why human rights protection is not sufficient cause for war 5. What is it good for? Consequences and the limits of war 6. Why two wrongs cannot make a right use of force: A critique of compound just causes Part III: Just war procedures and application 7. Jus ad (continuandum) bellum: reevaluating the justice of interventions over time 8. The nature and necessity of legitimate authorization 9. Conclusion: applying non-interventionist jus ad bellum
Introduction Part I: Ethical constraints on recourse to war: jus ad bellum vs realism and neo-traditionalism 1. Just war theory and the ethical restraint of war 2. Presumptions, principles, and prerogatives in war: against hawkish neo-traditionalism 3. Why punishment is not a just cause for war Part II: Defense of a just cause threshold 4. Against the new cosmopolitan interventionism: why human rights protection is not sufficient cause for war 5. What is it good for? Consequences and the limits of war 6. Why two wrongs cannot make a right use of force: A critique of compound just causes Part III: Just war procedures and application 7. Jus ad (continuandum) bellum: reevaluating the justice of interventions over time 8. The nature and necessity of legitimate authorization 9. Conclusion: applying non-interventionist jus ad bellum
Introduction Part I: Ethical constraints on recourse to war: jus ad bellum vs realism and neo-traditionalism 1. Just war theory and the ethical restraint of war 2. Presumptions, principles, and prerogatives in war: against hawkish neo-traditionalism 3. Why punishment is not a just cause for war Part II: Defense of a just cause threshold 4. Against the new cosmopolitan interventionism: why human rights protection is not sufficient cause for war 5. What is it good for? Consequences and the limits of war 6. Why two wrongs cannot make a right use of force: A critique of compound just causes Part III: Just war procedures and application 7. Jus ad (continuandum) bellum: reevaluating the justice of interventions over time 8. The nature and necessity of legitimate authorization 9. Conclusion: applying non-interventionist jus ad bellum
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Shop der buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg Amtsgericht Augsburg HRA 13309
