Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Cross-Cultural Considerations in Change Management. Exploring the Impact of Culture on Communication and Participation in Emerging Markets China and India]( "Cross-Cultural Considerations in Change Management. Exploring the Impact of Culture on Communication and Participation in Emerging Markets China and India")
Cross-Cultural Considerations in Change Management. Exploring the Impact of Culture on Communication and Participation in Emerging Markets China and India47,95 €![The Practice of Management]( "The Practice of Management")
The Practice of Management11,99 €![The Conflict and Communication Activity Book]( "The Conflict and Communication Activity Book")
The Conflict and Communication Activity Book34,99 €![The role of HRM Practices in Successful Organizational Change]( "The role of HRM Practices in Successful Organizational Change")
The role of HRM Practices in Successful Organizational Change38,99 €![Organizational Drivers for Social Alliance Formation in Bottom of the Pyramid Markets]( "Organizational Drivers for Social Alliance Formation in Bottom of the Pyramid Markets")
Organizational Drivers for Social Alliance Formation in Bottom of the Pyramid Markets18,95 €![The impact of Accreditation Canada program integration on organizational change and learning:]( "The impact of Accreditation Canada program integration on organizational change and learning:")
The impact of Accreditation Canada program integration on organizational change and learning:74,99 €![Organizational Dimensions of Global Change]( "Organizational Dimensions of Global Change")
Organizational Dimensions of Global Change235,99 €
Diploma Thesis from the year 2003 in the subject Business economics - Business Management, Corporate Governance, grade: 2,1, University of Münster (Wirtschaftswissenschaften), language: English, abstract: Inhaltsangabe:Abstract:
The global media industry has been subject to radical changes in its structure in recent years. International media companies have reached a dominant position in the global media markets through an enormous wave of mergers. Since the year 2000 the three biggest ever media mergers have taken place. AOL merged with Time Warner, Vivendi agreed on a merger with the Seagram Company and Canal+ and Viacom acquired the CBS Corporation. In 2001 the six biggest media conglomerates - AOL Time Warner, Walt Disney, Vivendi Universal, Viacom, Bertelsmann and News Corporation - alone generated revenues of $160 billion in comparison to aggregate revenues of $415 billion obtained by the Top 50 media companies.
This development was triggered by radical changes in theUS - Federal Communications Commission s (FCC) regulation policy. Though it is the change in the FCC s deregulation policy which made the wave of mergers possible to start off with, the reasons why companies actually merged were more complex. The headwords dominating most corporate growth strategies at that time were convergence , synergy and need for large scale . Looking at the assessments of media mergers and corporate strategies published by the press and investment analysts one notices that they underlie a certain tendency towards unanimous and trend affected formation of opinion. While in 1999 the idea of convergence was embraced and denominated as one of the biggest opportunities for media companies ever, in 2002 the ratings and assessments of companies which tried to obtain first mover advantage in the newly emerging converged market were principally critical. At large, these judgments correlated to a very high degree with the rise and downturn of the new economy. Accordingly, some of the executives, who pressed ahead with the idea of convergence and spurred on mergers in order to achieve synergies, like Mr. Middelhoff (former CEO of Bertelsmann), Mr. Messier (former CEO of Vivendi Universal) and recently Mr. Case (former chairman of AOL Time Warner) had to vacate their positions. Yet some business leaders are beginning to break up the fully integrated media groups that emanated from these mergers.
This change in corporate strategies and in the assessment of media mergers brings up the following question: Is it that a fundamental change in the business environment has occurred? And did this change make the economic motives which not long ago underlay the wave of mergers and acquisitions obsolete? Or has the media industry awoke to the cognition that the keywords convergence , synergy and need for large scale which fuelled the emergence of fully integrated, global media conglomerates, at no time have been more than a few hyped buzzwords?
The present thesis will elaborate the major causes for organizational changes in the global media industry and the consequences of these changes, which media companies now have to react to. The key economic characteristics prevailing in the media industry and the changes that have occurred in the latter in recent years will be analyzed on the basis of the model of the value chain. Furthermore it will be examined which economic concepts can be applied in order to evaluate the advantageousness of different types of mergers and acquisitions. In particular it will be shown that the bigger part of the strategic arguments often asserted as rationale for corporate growth strategies can be ascribed to a few basic economic concepts. In this connection it will be analyzed in detail, to which degree transaction cost theoretic considerations, which the majority of the literature about media economics treats as secondary, can contribute to the assessment of vertical growt...
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
The global media industry has been subject to radical changes in its structure in recent years. International media companies have reached a dominant position in the global media markets through an enormous wave of mergers. Since the year 2000 the three biggest ever media mergers have taken place. AOL merged with Time Warner, Vivendi agreed on a merger with the Seagram Company and Canal+ and Viacom acquired the CBS Corporation. In 2001 the six biggest media conglomerates - AOL Time Warner, Walt Disney, Vivendi Universal, Viacom, Bertelsmann and News Corporation - alone generated revenues of $160 billion in comparison to aggregate revenues of $415 billion obtained by the Top 50 media companies.
This development was triggered by radical changes in theUS - Federal Communications Commission s (FCC) regulation policy. Though it is the change in the FCC s deregulation policy which made the wave of mergers possible to start off with, the reasons why companies actually merged were more complex. The headwords dominating most corporate growth strategies at that time were convergence , synergy and need for large scale . Looking at the assessments of media mergers and corporate strategies published by the press and investment analysts one notices that they underlie a certain tendency towards unanimous and trend affected formation of opinion. While in 1999 the idea of convergence was embraced and denominated as one of the biggest opportunities for media companies ever, in 2002 the ratings and assessments of companies which tried to obtain first mover advantage in the newly emerging converged market were principally critical. At large, these judgments correlated to a very high degree with the rise and downturn of the new economy. Accordingly, some of the executives, who pressed ahead with the idea of convergence and spurred on mergers in order to achieve synergies, like Mr. Middelhoff (former CEO of Bertelsmann), Mr. Messier (former CEO of Vivendi Universal) and recently Mr. Case (former chairman of AOL Time Warner) had to vacate their positions. Yet some business leaders are beginning to break up the fully integrated media groups that emanated from these mergers.
This change in corporate strategies and in the assessment of media mergers brings up the following question: Is it that a fundamental change in the business environment has occurred? And did this change make the economic motives which not long ago underlay the wave of mergers and acquisitions obsolete? Or has the media industry awoke to the cognition that the keywords convergence , synergy and need for large scale which fuelled the emergence of fully integrated, global media conglomerates, at no time have been more than a few hyped buzzwords?
The present thesis will elaborate the major causes for organizational changes in the global media industry and the consequences of these changes, which media companies now have to react to. The key economic characteristics prevailing in the media industry and the changes that have occurred in the latter in recent years will be analyzed on the basis of the model of the value chain. Furthermore it will be examined which economic concepts can be applied in order to evaluate the advantageousness of different types of mergers and acquisitions. In particular it will be shown that the bigger part of the strategic arguments often asserted as rationale for corporate growth strategies can be ascribed to a few basic economic concepts. In this connection it will be analyzed in detail, to which degree transaction cost theoretic considerations, which the majority of the literature about media economics treats as secondary, can contribute to the assessment of vertical growt...
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.