Elena Meyer-Clement

Party Hegemony and Entrepreneurial Power in China

Institutional Change in the Film and Music Industries

• Broschiertes Buch

Produktbeschreibung

This book explores the adaptability of the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP's) hegemonic rule to marketization and commercialization processes. In addition, it gives a detailed account of the political and economic history of the Chinese film and music industries and offers a fresh perspective on the origins of today's Chinese cultural mainstream.

---

Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.

Produktdetails

• Verlag: Routledge
• Seitenzahl: 286
• Erscheinungstermin: 5. Februar 2018
• Englisch
• Abmessung: 234mm x 156mm x 16mm
• Gewicht: 439g
• ISBN-13: 9781138482579
• ISBN-10: 1138482579
• Artikelnr.: 51133166

Autorenporträt

Elena Meyer-Clement is a research fellow at the German research network "Governance in China" and teaches Chinese politics and society at the University of Tübingen, Germany. Her research focuses on Chinese cultural politics, the private sector, local governance and urbanisation.

Inhaltsangabe

Introduction Part I Chinese cultural policy
1. Cultural policy in Republican China
2. Towards mass culture under Mao Zedong
3. Beyond propaganda in Reform China
4. Chinese cultural industries
Part II Economic and administrative institutions of control
5. Nationalisation and the installation of CCP control
6. The emergence of private production companies
7. Towards commercialisation with constrained private participation
8. Piracy and the emerging copyright regime
Part III The censorship and propaganda systems
9. Formation of modern political censorship and propaganda
10. Erosion of political-ideological control in the 1980s and 1990s
11. Institutional renovation with private producers' participation
12. Mass media control
Part IV Private film and music production companies as agents of
change
13. Group formation
14. Business associations and collective lobbying
15. Individual coping strategies, individual lobbying and political
embeddedness
Conclusion