Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![What in your opinion, has been the most significant impact of the incorporation of Human Rights legislation into British law?]( "What in your opinion, has been the most significant impact of the incorporation of Human Rights legislation into British law?")
What in your opinion, has been the most significant impact of the incorporation of Human Rights legislation into British law?17,95 €![The Hart-Fuller Debate in the Twenty-First Century]( "The Hart-Fuller Debate in the Twenty-First Century")
The Hart-Fuller Debate in the Twenty-First Century112,99 €![Community Justice Centers]( "Community Justice Centers")
Community Justice Centers9,99 €![Delegierte Verfassungsentwicklung]( "Delegierte Verfassungsentwicklung")
Delegierte Verfassungsentwicklung94,00 €![Slapper and Kelly's The English Legal System]( "Slapper and Kelly's The English Legal System")
Slapper and Kelly's The English Legal System251,99 €![The doctrine of 'intention to create legal relations']( "The doctrine of 'intention to create legal relations'")
The doctrine of 'intention to create legal relations'15,95 €![A Brief Explanation of American and German Legal Education]( "A Brief Explanation of American and German Legal Education")
A Brief Explanation of American and German Legal Education15,95 €
Essay from the year 2005 in the subject Law - Comparative Legal Systems, Comparative Law, grade: 1st, University of Warwick, course: Modern English Legal System, language: English, abstract: The famous decision of Pepper v Hart overturned the rule that travaux préperatoires cannot be taken into consideration by the judges. This essay provides a brief analysis of the decision and its impact on statutory interpretation to this day.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.