Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Enteral Feeding with Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Evaluation]( "Enteral Feeding with Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Evaluation")
Enteral Feeding with Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Evaluation23,99 €![Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy Anterior Transforamina way]( "Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy Anterior Transforamina way")
Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy Anterior Transforamina way23,99 €![Craniopharyngiomas]( "Craniopharyngiomas")
Craniopharyngiomas106,99 €![Sociocultural and economic factors in nutritional status.]( "Sociocultural and economic factors in nutritional status.")
Sociocultural and economic factors in nutritional status.44,99 €![Pharyngo-esophageal foreign bodies]( "Pharyngo-esophageal foreign bodies")
Pharyngo-esophageal foreign bodies29,99 €![Gastroduodenoscopy in infectious patients]( "Gastroduodenoscopy in infectious patients")
Gastroduodenoscopy in infectious patients44,99 €![Medical thoracoscopy]( "Medical thoracoscopy")
Medical thoracoscopy39,99 €
Since its first description in 1980 by Gauderer, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) has become the method of choice for prolonged enteral nutrition. The objective of our study was to evaluate the predictive factors of peristomal infection and mortality after PEG.A mono-centric, retrospective study was conducted, including all patients who received an EPM tube from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2020.Thirty-seven patients were included. Neurological causes were the main indication in 26 cases. The only risk factor for mortality identified in our study by univariate analysis was low weight (<50 kg) (p=0.023).Undernutrition and advanced age are poor prognostic factors in patients receiving EPM. Therefore, EPM should be offered as early as possible to avoid undernutrition and thus improve the prognosis of these patients.