Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Entwicklung eines Beam Loss Monitor Test Systems]( "Entwicklung eines Beam Loss Monitor Test Systems")
Entwicklung eines Beam Loss Monitor Test Systems49,00 €![Phase Lock Loops and Frequency Synthesis]( "Phase Lock Loops and Frequency Synthesis")
Phase Lock Loops and Frequency Synthesis209,99 €![Digital Phase Lock Loops]( "Digital Phase Lock Loops")
Digital Phase Lock Loops108,99 €![Study of Second Generation High Temperature Superconductors: Electromagnetic Characteristics and AC Loss Analysis]( "Study of Second Generation High Temperature Superconductors: Electromagnetic Characteristics and AC Loss Analysis")
Study of Second Generation High Temperature Superconductors: Electromagnetic Characteristics and AC Loss Analysis74,99 €![Modeling Vegetation Effects for Path Loss Prediction in Urban Areas]( "Modeling Vegetation Effects for Path Loss Prediction in Urban Areas")
Modeling Vegetation Effects for Path Loss Prediction in Urban Areas32,99 €![Interference and Path Loss of Cellular Technology]( "Interference and Path Loss of Cellular Technology")
Interference and Path Loss of Cellular Technology36,99 €![Digital Phase Lock Loops]( "Digital Phase Lock Loops")
Digital Phase Lock Loops185,99 €
We give a positive answer to the classical question
of whether phase estimators of different types, slip
cycles. We develop a small noise analysis for the
calculation of the mean time to lose lock (MTLL) of
the minimum noise energy (MNE) filter and find that
this MTLL is much longer than in other conventional
phase estimators. The MNE criterion in filtering, in
contrast to the minimal mean square estimation error
(MSEE) criterion, bypasses Zakai''s equation and
stochastic differential equations that approximate
the optimal estimator. We find that in the limit of
small noise there is a huge gap between the MTLL of
the MNE filter and the MTLL of existing phase
estimators, such as the extended Kalman filter (EKF),
other phase locked loops (PLL), and particle filters.
It follows that the performance threshold of existing
phase estimators can be considerably extended. We
estimate the tradeoff between the complexity of the
implementation of realizable MNE filters and the
degradation of their MTLL relative to the true one.
of whether phase estimators of different types, slip
cycles. We develop a small noise analysis for the
calculation of the mean time to lose lock (MTLL) of
the minimum noise energy (MNE) filter and find that
this MTLL is much longer than in other conventional
phase estimators. The MNE criterion in filtering, in
contrast to the minimal mean square estimation error
(MSEE) criterion, bypasses Zakai''s equation and
stochastic differential equations that approximate
the optimal estimator. We find that in the limit of
small noise there is a huge gap between the MTLL of
the MNE filter and the MTLL of existing phase
estimators, such as the extended Kalman filter (EKF),
other phase locked loops (PLL), and particle filters.
It follows that the performance threshold of existing
phase estimators can be considerably extended. We
estimate the tradeoff between the complexity of the
implementation of realizable MNE filters and the
degradation of their MTLL relative to the true one.