Far from being a philosopher who turns his back on what is taken to be a mistaken metaphysical tradition, Bell argues that Deleuze is best understood as a thinker who endeavoured to continue the work of traditional metaphysics and philosophy.
Far from being a philosopher who turns his back on what is taken to be a mistaken metaphysical tradition, Bell argues that Deleuze is best understood as a thinker who endeavoured to continue the work of traditional metaphysics and philosophy.
Jeffrey A. Bell is a professor in the Department of Philosophy at Southeastern Louisiana University.
Inhaltsangabe
Acknowledgments Introduction Part One. Thinking Difference 1. Systematic Thinking and the Philosophy of Difference 2. Ironing Out the Differences: Nietzsche and Deleuze as Spinozists 3. Philosophizing the Double Bind: Deleuze Reads Nietzsche o Pharmakon o Mimesis o Thumos o Critique without Redemption 4. Thinking Difference: Heidegger and Deleuze on Aristotle 5. Thinking and the Loss of System: Derrida and Deleuze on Artaud Part Two. Rethinking System 1. Rethinking System * Whitehead * Chaosmos and Expression * Dynamic Systems Conclusion: Philosophy at the Edge of Chaos Notes Bibliography Index
Acknowledgments Introduction Part One. Thinking Difference 1. Systematic Thinking and the Philosophy of Difference 2. Ironing Out the Differences: Nietzsche and Deleuze as Spinozists 3. Philosophizing the Double Bind: Deleuze Reads Nietzsche o Pharmakon o Mimesis o Thumos o Critique without Redemption 4. Thinking Difference: Heidegger and Deleuze on Aristotle 5. Thinking and the Loss of System: Derrida and Deleuze on Artaud Part Two. Rethinking System 1. Rethinking System * Whitehead * Chaosmos and Expression * Dynamic Systems Conclusion: Philosophy at the Edge of Chaos Notes Bibliography Index
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Shop der buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg Amtsgericht Augsburg HRA 13309
