Mark Tebbit

Philosophy of Law

An Introduction

• Gebundenes Buch

Produktbeschreibung

Philosophy of Law: An Introduction provides an ideal starting-point for students of philosophy and law. Setting it clearly against the historical background, Mark Tebbit quickly leads readers into the heart of the philosophical questions that dominate philosophy of law today. He provides an exceptionally wide-ranging overview of the contending theories that have sought to resolve these problems. He does so without assuming prior knowledge either of philosophy or law on the part of the reader. This new third edition has been updated and extended again to include assessments of important developments in philosophy and law in the early years of the 21st century.

---

Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.

Produktdetails

• Verlag: Taylor & Francis
• 3rd edition
• Seitenzahl: 302
• Erscheinungstermin: 1. Februar 2017
• Englisch
• Abmessung: 234mm x 156mm x 19mm
• Gewicht: 617g
• ISBN-13: 9780415827454
• ISBN-10: 0415827450
• Artikelnr.: 57004666

Autorenporträt

Mark Tebbit is a Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Reading. He is also Associate Professor and a Member of Faculty at the University of Notre Dame.

Inhaltsangabe

Preface to 3rd Edition
Acknowledgements
Part I: What is the law?
1. Morality, justice and natural law
Morality and law at variance
What is justice?
Natural law theory and legal positivism
Traditional natural law theory
Conclusion
Study questions and further reading
2. From common law to modern positivism
Common law today
Early positivism: an age of philosophical transition
Austin's legal positivism
Austin's command theory
Conclusion
Study questions and further reading
3. Hart's legal positivism
Hart's challenge to Austin
Legal and moral obligation
Internalisation
Conventions and obligations
Minimal natural law
Primary and secondary rules
The rule of recognition
Positivist doubts about Hart's system of rules
Conclusion
Study questions and further reading
4. Legal theory and the Nazi legality problem
Hans Kelsen's pure theory of law
Radbruch against Kelsen
Fuller's secular version of natural law
The problem of Nazi legality
Conclusion
Study questions and further reading
5. Legal realism
Pragmatism and legal realism
Who were the realists?
Legal theory and judicial practice
The pragmatist attack on certainty
The realist revolt against formalism
Abductive inference to the best explanation
Realism and rule-scepticism
The pragmatics of justice
Hart's criticism
Conclusion
Study questions and further reading
6. Competing images of law in contemporary jurisprudence
Hard cases and legal positivism
Dworkin's theory of law as integrity
Dworkin's hard cases
Criticisms of Dworkin
Conclusion
Study questions and further reading
7. Radical challenges to mainstream theories
The roots of modernity and the Enlightenment
Critics of the Enlightenment: Marx and Nietzsche
The postmodernist attack on modernity: Foucault and Derrida
Critical Legal Studies
The contradictions in liberalism
Justice modern and postmodern
Conclusion: Perspectivism and truth
Study questions and further reading
Part II: The reach of the law
8. Obedience and disobedience
Natural law and positivist responses
H.D.Thoreau: Conscience as the sole basis for obligation
Socrates' arguments in Plato's Crito
Consequentialist arguments for conditional obedience
Classical contract theory: Hobbes and Locke
Rawls: the original position and the conditional duty to obey
Injustice and civil disobedience
Conclusion
Study questions and further reading
9. Legal and moral rights
Rights and rights-scepticism
Bentham's attack on rights
Responses to rights-scepticism
Absolute rights
Rights versus utility - Bentham and Mill
Dworkin's theory of rights
The Human Rights Act (1998) and the case of the conjoined twins
Conclusion
Study questions and further reading
10. Law and private morals
Liberalisation and the Wolfenden Report
J.S. Mill and liberty
Devlin's critique of the Wolfenden Report
Hart's reply to Devlin
Dworkin's critique of Devlin
Conclusion
Study questions and further reading
11 Radical critiques of liberal theories of law
The liberal concept of the individual
The contextualisation of universal rights
Marx and Marxism
Feminist jurisprudence and the rights of women
Rights in relation to class, sex and race
Conclusion
Study questions and further reading
Part III
Criminal responsibility and punishment
12 Guilty minds: recklessness, manslaughter and murder
Criminal responsibility and the mens rea doctrine in English common law
Negligence and recklessness
Intentional killing and murder
Direct and oblique intention
The subjective-objective controversy
Conclusion
Study questions and further reading
13 Unlawful killing: the defences of necessity and duress
The defence of duress
Murder and the Hale authority
The defence of necessity
The classic cases
Arguments for and against necessity as a defence to murder
Should the Hale authority allow any exceptions?
A veil of ignorance test
Intention
Study questions and further reading
14 Insanity and diminished responsibility
Traditional problems with insanity
The case of Daniel M'Naghten
The M'Naghten Rules and their critics
Diminished responsibility and the 1957 Homicide Act
Conclusion
Study questions and further reading
15 Theories of punishment
The problem of justification
Punishment justified by its effects
Justifying punishment retrospectively
Criticisms of the traditional theories
Weaknesses of retributivism
Modifications and compromises
Punishment as communication: Nozick and Hampton
Desert and deterrence in sentencing
Conclusion
Study questions and further reading
16 Radical perspectives on crime and punishment
Enlightenment liberalism and its critics
The range of radical criticisms
The individual and society
Intention and determinism
Free agency, criminal intention and mens rea
Conclusion: Enlightenment values and the rule of law
Study questions and further reading
Bibliography
Index

---

Preface to 3rd Edition

Acknowledgements

Part I: What is the law?

1. Morality, justice and natural law

Morality and law at variance

What is justice?

Natural law theory and legal positivism

Traditional natural law theory

Conclusion

Study questions and further reading

2. From common law to modern positivism

Common law today

Early positivism: an age of philosophical transition

Austin's legal positivism

Austin's command theory

Conclusion

Study questions and further reading

3. Hart's legal positivism

Hart's challenge to Austin

Legal and moral obligation

Internalisation

Conventions and obligations

Minimal natural law

Primary and secondary rules

The rule of recognition

Positivist doubts about Hart's system of rules

Conclusion

Study questions and further reading

4. Legal theory and the Nazi legality problem

Hans Kelsen's pure theory of law

Radbruch against Kelsen

Fuller's secular version of natural law

The problem of Nazi legality

Conclusion

Study questions and further reading

5. Legal realism

Pragmatism and legal realism

Who were the realists?

Legal theory and judicial practice

The pragmatist attack on certainty

The realist revolt against formalism

Abductive inference to the best explanation

Realism and rule-scepticism

The pragmatics of justice

Hart's criticism

Conclusion

Study questions and further reading

6. Competing images of law in contemporary jurisprudence

Hard cases and legal positivism

Dworkin's theory of law as integrity

Dworkin's hard cases

Criticisms of Dworkin

Conclusion

Study questions and further reading

7. Radical challenges to mainstream theories

The roots of modernity and the Enlightenment

Critics of the Enlightenment: Marx and Nietzsche

The postmodernist attack on modernity: Foucault and Derrida

Critical Legal Studies

The contradictions in liberalism

Justice modern and postmodern

Conclusion: Perspectivism and truth

Study questions and further reading

Part II: The reach of the law

8. Obedience and disobedience

Natural law and positivist responses

H.D.Thoreau: Conscience as the sole basis for obligation

Socrates' arguments in Plato's Crito

Consequentialist arguments for conditional obedience

Classical contract theory: Hobbes and Locke

Rawls: the original position and the conditional duty to obey

Injustice and civil disobedience

Conclusion

Study questions and further reading

9. Legal and moral rights

Rights and rights-scepticism

Bentham's attack on rights

Responses to rights-scepticism

Absolute rights

Rights versus utility - Bentham and Mill

Dworkin's theory of rights

The Human Rights Act (1998) and the case of the conjoined twins

Conclusion

Study questions and further reading

10. Law and private morals

Liberalisation and the Wolfenden Report

J.S. Mill and liberty

Devlin's critique of the Wolfenden Report

Hart's reply to Devlin

Dworkin's critique of Devlin

Conclusion

Study questions and further reading

11 Radical critiques of liberal theories of law

The liberal concept of the individual

The contextualisation of universal rights

Marx and Marxism

Feminist jurisprudence and the rights of women

Rights in relation to class, sex and race

Conclusion

Study questions and further reading

Part III

Criminal responsibility and punishment

12 Guilty minds: recklessness, manslaughter and murder

Criminal responsibility and the mens rea doctrine in English common law

Negligence and recklessness

Intentional killing and murder

Direct and oblique intention

The subjective-objective controversy

Conclusion

Study questions and further reading

13 Unlawful killing: the defences of necessity and duress

The defence of duress

Murder and the Hale authority

The defence of necessity

The classic cases

Arguments for and against necessity as a defence to murder

Should the Hale authority allow any exceptions?

A veil of ignorance test

Intention

Study questions and further reading

14 Insanity and diminished responsibility

Traditional problems with insanity

The case of Daniel M'Naghten

The M'Naghten Rules and their critics

Diminished responsibility and the 1957 Homicide Act

Conclusion

Study questions and further reading

15 Theories of punishment

The problem of justification

Punishment justified by its effects

Justifying punishment retrospectively

Criticisms of the traditional theories

Weaknesses of retributivism

Modifications and compromises

Punishment as communication: Nozick and Hampton

Desert and deterrence in sentencing

Conclusion

Study questions and further reading

16 Radical perspectives on crime and punishment

Enlightenment liberalism and its critics

The range of radical criticisms

The individual and society

Intention and determinism

Free agency, criminal intention and mens rea

Conclusion: Enlightenment values and the rule of law

Study questions and further reading



Bibliography

Index

Rezensionen

"With its uniquely detailed focus on the Common Law, this is the best textbook available for philosophy students not already familiar with law as it is practiced in the UK, US, and related systems. It will likewise be particularly valuable to law students interested in philosophising about the actual concrete legal systems which surround our lives, rather than "the law" as some abstract and contextless ideal object." Shane Glackin, University of Exeter, UK