Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Photons]( "Photons")
Photons66,99 €![The Lesser-Known Albert Einstein]( "The Lesser-Known Albert Einstein")
The Lesser-Known Albert Einstein81,99 €![Springer Handbook of Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics]( "Springer Handbook of Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics")
Springer Handbook of Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics434,99 €![Fundamentals]( "Fundamentals")
Fundamentals16,99 €![L.I. Mandelstam and His School in Physics]( "L.I. Mandelstam and His School in Physics")
L.I. Mandelstam and His School in Physics110,99 €![David Bohm: Causality and Chance, Letters to Three Women]( "David Bohm: Causality and Chance, Letters to Three Women")
David Bohm: Causality and Chance, Letters to Three Women110,99 €![L.I. Mandelstam and His School in Physics]( "L.I. Mandelstam and His School in Physics")
L.I. Mandelstam and His School in Physics110,99 €
This book focuses on the gradual formation of the concept of 'light quanta' or 'photons', as they have usually been called in English since 1926. The great number of synonyms that have been used by physicists to denote this concept indicates that there are many different mental models of what 'light quanta' are: simply finite, 'quantized packages of energy' or 'bullets of light'? 'Atoms of light' or 'molecules of light'? 'Light corpuscles' or 'quantized waves'? Singularities of the field or spatially extended structures able to interfere? 'Photons' in G.N. Lewis's sense, or as defined by QED, i.e. virtual exchange particles transmitting the electromagnetic force?
The term 'light quantum' made its first appearance in Albert Einstein's 1905 paper on a "heuristic point of view" to cope with the photoelectric effect and other forms of interaction of light and matter, but the mental model associated with it has a rich history both before and after 1905. Some ofits semantic layers go as far back as Newton and Kepler, some are only fully expressed several decades later, while others initially increased in importance then diminished and finally vanished. In conjunction with these various terms, several mental models of light quanta were developed-six of them are explored more closely in this book. It discusses two historiographic approaches to the problem of concept formation: (a) the author's own model of conceptual development as a series of semantic accretions and (b) Mark Turner's model of 'conceptual blending'. Both of these models are shown to be useful and should be explored further.
This is the first historiographically sophisticated history of the fully fledged concept and all of its twelve semantic layers. It systematically combines the history of science with the history of terms and a philosophically inspired history of ideas in conjunction with insights from cognitive science.
The term 'light quantum' made its first appearance in Albert Einstein's 1905 paper on a "heuristic point of view" to cope with the photoelectric effect and other forms of interaction of light and matter, but the mental model associated with it has a rich history both before and after 1905. Some ofits semantic layers go as far back as Newton and Kepler, some are only fully expressed several decades later, while others initially increased in importance then diminished and finally vanished. In conjunction with these various terms, several mental models of light quanta were developed-six of them are explored more closely in this book. It discusses two historiographic approaches to the problem of concept formation: (a) the author's own model of conceptual development as a series of semantic accretions and (b) Mark Turner's model of 'conceptual blending'. Both of these models are shown to be useful and should be explored further.
This is the first historiographically sophisticated history of the fully fledged concept and all of its twelve semantic layers. It systematically combines the history of science with the history of terms and a philosophically inspired history of ideas in conjunction with insights from cognitive science.
"The book is ... doubly interesting, presenting readers with a useful review of key concepts in science along with reflections on the workings of science. It is highly recommended for physicists, physics students, and historians of science. ... Nonetheless, researchers interested in science learning will find a rich source of material for further investigation in this book." (Olival Freire, Isis, Vol. 111 (2), 2020)