Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Flexibility Principles in Boolean Semantics, Volume 37: The Interpretation of Coordination, Plurality, and Scope in Natural Language]( "Flexibility Principles in Boolean Semantics, Volume 37: The Interpretation of Coordination, Plurality, and Scope in Natural Language")
Flexibility Principles in Boolean Semantics, Volume 37: The Interpretation of Coordination, Plurality, and Scope in Natural Language11,99 €![Bentley's Miscellany, Volume 38]( "Bentley's Miscellany, Volume 38")
Bentley's Miscellany, Volume 3845,99 €![The Structure Underlying Measure Phrase Sentences]( "The Structure Underlying Measure Phrase Sentences")
The Structure Underlying Measure Phrase Sentences109,99 €![Phrase Structure and Argument Structure]( "Phrase Structure and Argument Structure")
Phrase Structure and Argument Structure159,99 €![Essays on the Representational and Derivational Nature of Grammar, Volume 40: The Diversity of Wh-Constructions]( "Essays on the Representational and Derivational Nature of Grammar, Volume 40: The Diversity of Wh-Constructions")
Essays on the Representational and Derivational Nature of Grammar, Volume 40: The Diversity of Wh-Constructions12,99 €![A Two-Tiered Theory of Control, Volume 71]( "A Two-Tiered Theory of Control, Volume 71")
A Two-Tiered Theory of Control, Volume 7112,99 €![Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents]( "Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents")
Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents198,99 €
In "Phrase Structure Composition and Syntactic Dependencies," Robert Frank explores an approach to syntactic theory that weds the Tree Adjoining Grammar (TAG) formalism with the minimalist framework. TAG has been extensively studied both for its mathematical properties and for its usefulness in computational linguistics applications. Frank shows that incorporating TAG's formally restrictive operations for structure building considerably simplifies the model of grammatical competence, particularly in the components concerned with syntactic movement and locality. The empirical advantages of the resulting model, illustrated with extensive case studies of subject-raising constructions and wh-questions, point toward a conception of grammar that is sharply limited in its computational power.