Sarah Broadie (Scotland University of St Andrews)
Plato's Sun-Like Good
Sarah Broadie (Scotland University of St Andrews)
Plato's Sun-Like Good
- Gebundenes Buch
- Merkliste
- Auf die Merkliste
- Bewerten Bewerten
- Teilen
- Produkt teilen
- Produkterinnerung
- Produkterinnerung
In this book, Sarah Broadie presents an original and lucid in-depth discussion of the Republic's philosopher-rulers, their dialectic, and their relationship to the form of the good. By reconceiving that form as 'interrogative', the book interprets those central reference-points of Platonism in down-to-earth terms without undermining Plato's philosophical greatness.
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
- Noburu Notomi (Japan Kyushu University)The Unity of Plato's Sophist143,99 €
- Voula Tsouna (Santa Barbara University of California)Plato's Charmides32,99 €
- Voula Tsouna (Santa Barbara University of California)Plato's Charmides95,99 €
- Christina Hoenig (University of Pittsburgh)Plato's Timaeus and the Latin Tradition35,99 €
- Dominic J. O'Meara (Switzerland Universite de Fribourg)Cosmology and Politics in Plato's Later Works28,99 €
- Dominic Scott (Cambridge Clare College)Plato's Meno42,99 €
- Andrea Nightingale (California Stanford University)Philosophy and Religion in Plato's Dialogues48,99 €
-
-
-
In this book, Sarah Broadie presents an original and lucid in-depth discussion of the Republic's philosopher-rulers, their dialectic, and their relationship to the form of the good. By reconceiving that form as 'interrogative', the book interprets those central reference-points of Platonism in down-to-earth terms without undermining Plato's philosophical greatness.
Produktdetails
- Produktdetails
- Verlag: Cambridge University Press
- Seitenzahl: 252
- Erscheinungstermin: 22. Juli 2021
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 235mm x 157mm x 18mm
- Gewicht: 492g
- ISBN-13: 9781316516874
- ISBN-10: 1316516873
- Artikelnr.: 61442704
- Verlag: Cambridge University Press
- Seitenzahl: 252
- Erscheinungstermin: 22. Juli 2021
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 235mm x 157mm x 18mm
- Gewicht: 492g
- ISBN-13: 9781316516874
- ISBN-10: 1316516873
- Artikelnr.: 61442704
Sarah Broadie is Bishop Wardlaw Professor of Philosophy at the University of St Andrews. She is author of Aristotle and Beyond: Essays on Metaphysics and Ethics (Cambridge University Press, 2007) and Nature and Divinity in Plato's Timaeus (Cambridge University Press, 2011), and editor of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics: A Philosophical Introduction and Commentary (2002). She has published dozens of book chapters and articles on Plato and Aristotle, and was awarded an OBE in 2019 for services to classical philosophy.
Part 1. Approaching the Sun-Good Analogy: 1.1 Introductory
1.2 The philosopher-rulers' intellectual task
1.3 'The most important thing to learn': Between plural and singular
1.4 What further knowledge does the longer way achieve?
Part 2. The Form of the Good and Knowledge: 2.1 Sun, cave, and sun again
2.2 Connecting sun and line
2.3 Higher and lower intellectual levels
2.4 Mathematical versus dialectical hypotheses
2.5 Saph¿neia
2.6 The form of the good as non-hypothetical principle
2.7 Dialectic and the good: Some questions
2.8 The role of the form of the good in dialectic
2.9 Some objections and replies
2.10 Textual counterevidence
2.11 The non-hypothetical principle as first premiss?
2.12 The form of the good as object of definition?
2.13 Dialectic and experience
2.14 Diagrams, dialectic, and context
2.15 Dialectic in government
2.16 Not rigorous enough?
2.17 Why is dialectic cognitively superior to mathematics?
2.18 Why are we shown so little about dialectic in the Republic?
2.19 True philosophers versus sight-lovers
2.20 Criteria and scope of 'good'
2.21 Main positions of Parts 1 and 2
Part 3. The Form of the Good and Being: 3.1 Preliminaries
3.2 First proposal
3.3 Interim discussion of 505a2-4
3.4 Second proposal
3.5 Perfectionist accounts
3.6 System accounts
Part 4. Various Further Questions: 4.1 Ambiguity of 'the good' (I)
4.2 Ambiguity of 'the good' (II)
4.3 Why the mathematical education?
4.4 Cosmology, theology
Part 5. Winding Up.
1.2 The philosopher-rulers' intellectual task
1.3 'The most important thing to learn': Between plural and singular
1.4 What further knowledge does the longer way achieve?
Part 2. The Form of the Good and Knowledge: 2.1 Sun, cave, and sun again
2.2 Connecting sun and line
2.3 Higher and lower intellectual levels
2.4 Mathematical versus dialectical hypotheses
2.5 Saph¿neia
2.6 The form of the good as non-hypothetical principle
2.7 Dialectic and the good: Some questions
2.8 The role of the form of the good in dialectic
2.9 Some objections and replies
2.10 Textual counterevidence
2.11 The non-hypothetical principle as first premiss?
2.12 The form of the good as object of definition?
2.13 Dialectic and experience
2.14 Diagrams, dialectic, and context
2.15 Dialectic in government
2.16 Not rigorous enough?
2.17 Why is dialectic cognitively superior to mathematics?
2.18 Why are we shown so little about dialectic in the Republic?
2.19 True philosophers versus sight-lovers
2.20 Criteria and scope of 'good'
2.21 Main positions of Parts 1 and 2
Part 3. The Form of the Good and Being: 3.1 Preliminaries
3.2 First proposal
3.3 Interim discussion of 505a2-4
3.4 Second proposal
3.5 Perfectionist accounts
3.6 System accounts
Part 4. Various Further Questions: 4.1 Ambiguity of 'the good' (I)
4.2 Ambiguity of 'the good' (II)
4.3 Why the mathematical education?
4.4 Cosmology, theology
Part 5. Winding Up.
Part 1. Approaching the Sun-Good Analogy: 1.1 Introductory
1.2 The philosopher-rulers' intellectual task
1.3 'The most important thing to learn': Between plural and singular
1.4 What further knowledge does the longer way achieve?
Part 2. The Form of the Good and Knowledge: 2.1 Sun, cave, and sun again
2.2 Connecting sun and line
2.3 Higher and lower intellectual levels
2.4 Mathematical versus dialectical hypotheses
2.5 Saph¿neia
2.6 The form of the good as non-hypothetical principle
2.7 Dialectic and the good: Some questions
2.8 The role of the form of the good in dialectic
2.9 Some objections and replies
2.10 Textual counterevidence
2.11 The non-hypothetical principle as first premiss?
2.12 The form of the good as object of definition?
2.13 Dialectic and experience
2.14 Diagrams, dialectic, and context
2.15 Dialectic in government
2.16 Not rigorous enough?
2.17 Why is dialectic cognitively superior to mathematics?
2.18 Why are we shown so little about dialectic in the Republic?
2.19 True philosophers versus sight-lovers
2.20 Criteria and scope of 'good'
2.21 Main positions of Parts 1 and 2
Part 3. The Form of the Good and Being: 3.1 Preliminaries
3.2 First proposal
3.3 Interim discussion of 505a2-4
3.4 Second proposal
3.5 Perfectionist accounts
3.6 System accounts
Part 4. Various Further Questions: 4.1 Ambiguity of 'the good' (I)
4.2 Ambiguity of 'the good' (II)
4.3 Why the mathematical education?
4.4 Cosmology, theology
Part 5. Winding Up.
1.2 The philosopher-rulers' intellectual task
1.3 'The most important thing to learn': Between plural and singular
1.4 What further knowledge does the longer way achieve?
Part 2. The Form of the Good and Knowledge: 2.1 Sun, cave, and sun again
2.2 Connecting sun and line
2.3 Higher and lower intellectual levels
2.4 Mathematical versus dialectical hypotheses
2.5 Saph¿neia
2.6 The form of the good as non-hypothetical principle
2.7 Dialectic and the good: Some questions
2.8 The role of the form of the good in dialectic
2.9 Some objections and replies
2.10 Textual counterevidence
2.11 The non-hypothetical principle as first premiss?
2.12 The form of the good as object of definition?
2.13 Dialectic and experience
2.14 Diagrams, dialectic, and context
2.15 Dialectic in government
2.16 Not rigorous enough?
2.17 Why is dialectic cognitively superior to mathematics?
2.18 Why are we shown so little about dialectic in the Republic?
2.19 True philosophers versus sight-lovers
2.20 Criteria and scope of 'good'
2.21 Main positions of Parts 1 and 2
Part 3. The Form of the Good and Being: 3.1 Preliminaries
3.2 First proposal
3.3 Interim discussion of 505a2-4
3.4 Second proposal
3.5 Perfectionist accounts
3.6 System accounts
Part 4. Various Further Questions: 4.1 Ambiguity of 'the good' (I)
4.2 Ambiguity of 'the good' (II)
4.3 Why the mathematical education?
4.4 Cosmology, theology
Part 5. Winding Up.