Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Argument by Cephas Brainerd Before the Judiciary Committee of the House of Representatives]( "Argument by Cephas Brainerd Before the Judiciary Committee of the House of Representatives")
Argument by Cephas Brainerd Before the Judiciary Committee of the House of Representatives15,99 €![The Orthodox Church and Independent Greece 1821 1852]( "The Orthodox Church and Independent Greece 1821 1852")
The Orthodox Church and Independent Greece 1821 185250,99 €![The Project Censored Guide to Independent Media and Activism]( "The Project Censored Guide to Independent Media and Activism")
The Project Censored Guide to Independent Media and Activism10,99 €![JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE Title 28 - Scholar's Choice Edition]( "JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE Title 28 - Scholar's Choice Edition")
JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE Title 28 - Scholar's Choice Edition32,99 €![Independent Review of Undp Evaluation Policy]( "Independent Review of Undp Evaluation Policy")
Independent Review of Undp Evaluation Policy28,99 €![Andes 2020: A New Strategy for the Challenges of Colombia and T He Region: Report of an Independent Commission Sponsored by the Council on Foreign Rel]( "Andes 2020: A New Strategy for the Challenges of Colombia and T He Region: Report of an Independent Commission Sponsored by the Council on Foreign Rel")
Andes 2020: A New Strategy for the Challenges of Colombia and T He Region: Report of an Independent Commission Sponsored by the Council on Foreign Rel17,99 €![White Nation Going, Going, Gone: A Platform for an Independent Pres/VP Team in 2020 Volume 1]( "White Nation Going, Going, Gone: A Platform for an Independent Pres/VP Team in 2020 Volume 1")
White Nation Going, Going, Gone: A Platform for an Independent Pres/VP Team in 2020 Volume 118,99 €
How do the justices of a nation's highest court arrive at their decisions? In the context of the US Supreme Court, the answer to this question is well established: justices seek to enshrine policy preferences in their decisions, but they do so in a manner consistent with 'the law' and in recognition that they are members of an institution with defined expectations and constraints. In other words, a justice's behaviour is a function of motives, means, and opportunities. Using Norway as a case study, this book shows that these forces are not peculiar to the decisional behaviour of American justices. Employing a modified attitudinal model, Grendstad, Shaffer and Waltenburg establish that the preferences of Norway's justices are related to their decisions. Consequently, the authors show how an understanding of judicial behaviour developed and most fully tested in the American judicial system is transportable to the courts of other countries.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.